Brief Summary On The New London City

2113 Words9 Pages
STUDENT’S NAME
LECTURER’S NAME
COURSE TITLE
DATE OF SUBMISSION

Question 1
Brief Fact Summary of the Case
During the year 2000, the New London city passed a growth program that, in the expressions of the Supreme Court of Connecticut, which was believed to be offering in the excess of 1,000 employment opportunities to the community at the moment, the program was believed to augment tax as well as other returns to the economy, and also taken as an act of refurbishing a financially destabilized city, alongside the waterfront regions and the downtown.” The piece of land was bought by the city administration and was then searching to implement popular realm to attain the left behind areas from reluctant landlords ("The Limits of Eminent Domain: Kelo v. City of New London", 2005).
Synopsis of Rule of Law
The judiciary had earlier convened in the Midkiff trail that likely financial growth fit as a suitable community function under the Central as well as State Constitutions. The judiciary has to encounter two troubles for popular realm- (a) that obtaining the specific lands at problem need to be logically fundamental to cater for the City’s targeted community facility and (b) that acquiring the lands were for “reasonably predictable needs.”
Statistics
During 2000, the New London city passed a growth program that, in the expressions of the Supreme Court of Connecticut, was considered to bring forth an approximate of about 1,000 employments, to augment tax as

More about Brief Summary On The New London City

Get Access