Britain 's Point Of View

to deal with the French and Russian forces , staunch allies, in order to avoid a war on

Conscription proved itself on angering many French Canadians. The October Crisis showed how French Canadians can fight back against Canada. The 1992 and 1995 Referendums demonstrated the actions that the French can take if they are ignored. Becoming aware of Canada’s actions can prevent straining French-English relations to the point where it cannot be

The film France is An Empire serves a form of propaganda to perpetuate the civilizing mission of France’s Office of the Colonies. Jules Ferry, France’s prime minister from 1880-1885, believed that it was their duty as a classified superior race to civilize the demeaned lower races. The civilizing mission was believed to be sharing the European generosity and compassion to those uncivilized people practicing, and living in uncultured conditions. The documentary details the advances that France brought to its colonies such as medicine, education, science, and military practices, but never shows nor allows native opinion. Through the use of evidentiary editing, the viewer listens to all the wonderful opportunities France brought its colonies, and proceeds to see the colonists enjoying the fruit of France’s labour. In addition, the use of diegetic sound furthers idea that the native practices were strange, and needed French influence. Jules Ferry’s civilizing mission, of superior races having a duty to refine the lower race, is justified in France is an Empire through the use of evidentiary editing and diegetic sound.

The ally between the Americans and the French was a strategy that proved to be successful during the Battle of Yorktown. However, because the French did not have conflict with either the Americans or the British, their involvement with this battle was contingent on two circumstances. First, the Americans must have the capability to defend and protect the French’s interest from their enemies. Second, the Americans would provide the allowance for the French

The British at that time was in the top two for the biggest army and the other country that had one of the biggest army was the French, “At the time the world had two superpowers, France and Britain”. So, allying with the French made a lot of sense and made America a threat to Great Britain. The French were also an alliance that the United State can trust because the French and Great Britain fought in a previous war known as the French and Indian War (Seven Years’ War). The French had lost that war, so they wanted to get back at Britain by allying with one of Britain’s enemy which was the United States. By allying with the French, who also had a strong navy would be beneficial too because it will help the Continental army fight off the British’s navy.

Britain first sent ships to the exciting “New World” to get a chance at the riches and wonders it held. They set up colonies there to claim the land that they had fought other countries for. However soon the colonies got annoyed with how unfairly Britain was treating them and wanted independence. The colonists were justified in becoming patriots and seeking independence because britain was an ocean away from the colonies, treated the colonies badly, and the colonies had more resources than britain itself.

Throughout the seventeenth and most of the eighteenth centuries, British colonies in North America and the West Indies were part of a transatlantic trade system. The British government utilized an economic approach that created policy and legislature to increase national wealth, a strategy also known as mercantilism. Mercantilist practices of the British towards the colonies were put in place to promote the British economy.

This being said, the French - English relations

The conference was called The Congress of Orr. The members of the Congress included nobles and kings of the countries that were apart of the allied forces that took down France. Each country wanted to take France and Britain for themselves; however, it would violate The System of The Balance of Powers if they did. So they decided to leave France alone for the time being. But it was agreed that Britain was too dangerous to be kept unchecked. The possibility of them using their colonies men to attack Europe was too high. So it was agreed that if Britain were to attack anyone of the allied forces country, Britain would be waging a war on the entirety of Europe. This oath of protection was known as the Oath of Kenrick. This oath secured the protection of the countries in Europe. But before this oath was taken the Ottomans Empire King questioned why were they going to so much extreme length to protect themselves from Britain. One of Russia’s representatives states that The British Empire although spread out is not one to be messed with. Their colonies are scattered all over the world giving them easy access to befriend and make allies with there surrounding countries. That is why the allied forces did not underestimate Britain and went to such extreme lengths to make sure they do not mess with Europe in retaliation for them being

England looked at the Treaty of Dunkirk as a way to start a Western Alliance that would be able to hold off the USA, the USSR or German would it ever arise. However, trying to start this alliance with France may have been counterproductive for the English State. While these two states at the time were the most powerful within Western Europe, the history between them is hard forgotten. Britain needed this alliance to expand the idea to other states within Western Europe. The main problem with the Treaty specifically with France is that Britain was afraid they would make the USSR feel like purposely trying to defend against them, this, therefore, increasing security over in the USSR domain. Britain was simply looking to create International Security , however in doing so may have made the USSR feel like they needed to increase because of this upcoming alliance, therefore initiating the security dilemma . While the state is the best level of analysis for the Treaty of Dunkirk, as the state relations do originate at the state the individual analysis has a few key points as well. As Britain when coordinating how to approach the Treaty of Dunkirk has essentially one main person coordinating it’s hard to specifically say that at the individual level, the most compelling argument could be made.

Being dependent on Great Britain compromises the social, political and economic freedom of the American colonies. Without independence, the colonies will still be guided by the rules of the British and will not be free to do as they would wish. According to Paine, the most important points to note regarding the necessity of being independent of Britain are trade relations, injuries and other disadvantages brought about by the wars Britain is having or likely to have and political freedom. Being dependent on a particular country or continent would imply that one enjoys only the opportunities enjoyed by those they countries they depend on. There are many opportunities that the American colonies can enjoy even when

Over the course of history, societies of greater technological advancements have dominated and often manipulated societies that lack their technological advancements. European countries and especially England have caused a great deal of damage to cultures and societies around the world through their manipulation of these entities.

Through the idea that Britain used the Treaty of Dunkirk as a way to start a Western Alliance that would be able to hold off the USA, the USSR or Germany would it ever arise. However, trying to start this alliance with France may have been counterproductive for the English State. While these two states at the time were the most powerful within Western Europe, the history between them is still a constant in the lives of the citizens . This alliance was forthcoming with the purpose of expanding the idea to other states within Western Europe. The main problem with the Treaty with France is that Britain was afraid they would make the USSR feel like trying to defend against them, this, therefore, increasing security over into the USSR domain. With Britain working on the creation of Western International Security would then lead to the USSR to feel like they needed to increase because of this upcoming alliance, therefore initiating the security dilemma . While the state is the best level of analysis for the Treaty of Dunkirk, as the state relations do originate at the state the individual analysis has a few key points as well. The formation of the Treaty of Dunkirk, analyzing it at the Individual level of analysis is less than compelling as Britain was more focused on creating state alliances, and not a single individual worked towards the creation of this agreement.

In order to fully understand how Britain’s decision to go to war against Germany is best explained one must engage into the debate revolving around the question of the extent to which Britain and other countries were responsible for causing war. This helps explain the intention Britain had for war which is vital in understanding their decision making process to cause war in the first place. Some schools of thought have come to the conclusion that it was everybody or nobody- the continent “slithered over the brink into the boiling cauldron of war without any trace of apprehension or dismay.”1 That analysis will be considered in this essay as will the widespread thesis that it was Germany’s aggression which not only created the preconditions for war, but also triggered Britain into war with the political imbalance of power being created from the growing naval and colonial expansion of Germany. Other factors that help explain why Britain went to war against Germany

The United Kingdom (UK) is one of the largest economies in Europe ranked at position 13 of the freest economies globally in 2015. The country recorded a GDP of 2.67817 trillion dollars in 2014 with an average annual GDP growth rate of 2.8% in the last five years. The World Bank ranked UK in 10th position as the best place to do business in 2014 based on its high regulations, robust business policies, highly skilled workforce, investors’ protection, developed infrastructure, and political stability. Since it is a member of the European Union (EU), the country presents an opportunity for the company to access more than 500 million consumers in the European market. This study recommends the establishment of a wholly owned subsidiary in the United Kingdom to improve profitability and productivity.