When approaching gallery 166 at the Metropolitan Museum of Art, I couldn’t help but notice the magnificent sculpture of the “Bronze statue of Camillus (acolyte).” As I began to study some background information on the early Imperial period of Roman culture, one would learn that there was an evident revival. The Romans were building at a fast pace and religious sacrifices were becoming more common. Throughout this Roman period, a Camillus (male) or Camilla (female) was the freeborn child of the religious cults officiant. These young boys were selected to serve during religious ceremonies where sacrifices were customary.
The sculpture was assembled to be perceived taller than it really was and stood on top of an approximately 4x4 foot…show more content…
Furthermore, his right arm was at his side with his four fingers curled where he would probably be found holding a jug of wine. Movement was not only conveyed in his just upper body, as the viewer sees that his left leg is found slightly behind his right, with its knee bent and the heel off the ground.
Overall, I found the sculpture to represent the generic idea of a Camillus in ancient Rome. The sculpture did a fine job symbolizing how the figures face, short hair, and body would be portrayed as an average human boy. Additionally, I think that most people would portray this figure to be a young boy from ancient Rome, particularly because of his Romanist robe and sandals.
A painting that caught my eye while in the museum was “The Mass of Saint Basil” by Pierre Hubert Subleyras, which was displayed in Gallery 620. During my observation of the piece, I found qualities that matched the “Bronze statue of Camillus (acolyte).” Similar to the sculpture, the scene on the painting is held in Rome and is portraying a religious Roman ceremony. I was intrigued with the robes and open-toed sandals that the young men on the side were wearing. Not only were the outfits similar, but also the men on the side, and the sculpture of the young boy have the same short and wavy hairstyle. Both pieces are Romans in religious episodes, offering the viewer the impression that this is proper attire for the Romans during this period. Therefore,