Bruce Schneier's Impact On Privacy And Security

Over the years, there has always been a lot of controversy surrounding the topic of whether or not the government should be able to monitor our activity on the internet. This especially become a huge debate more recently simply because of the many terrorist attacks and dangerous events that we’ve encountered. Many believe that if the government was given more insight to what the people of this country looked at on the internet, then they would be able to prevent many horrible things from happening. On the other hand, however, others feel that this is a violation of personal privacy and therefore should not be allowed. The government already monitors our internet usage but they are thinking of increasing what they monitory which has lead to many differing opinions among the people of the United States of America.

Cyber security threats change quickly as Internet increases, and also the related dangers are getting to be progressively international. Being covered against cyber security threats requires almost all end users, actually the most complex versions, to know the particular threats in addition to enhance their particular safety measures with a continuing foundation. On April 28, 2014 President Obama has declared that the “cyber threat is one of the most serious economic and national security challenges we face as a nation” and that “America 's economic prosperity in the 21st century will depend on cyber security.” The internet enables and also helps people in a many ways and a example is collect, store, process huge amounts of data, which includes vulnerable data of small business, transactional and personal. Everything in this world is based on internet now a days.

In Helen Nissenbaum's introduction chapter of Privacy in Context, she is mentioning how social issues have changed since technology has increased. In the 1960's, technology was a concern because of the databases of the government and others are being stored in the computers memory. This then began questions and the worries of peoples' privacy. Soon privacy became a big topic of concern on everyone's minds when "...books, articles and commentaries..." came out. From many saying that protecting our privacy means we are limiting ourselves and disclosing personal information. But people really should be able to control what information and how much of it is allowed to be pubic at a certain time. Some people have even said that privacy is "deeply

People in the Western world live an individualistic lifestyle. They value personal achievement and privacy. Privacy is seen as a basic right in the western world, despite the lack of laws in place to protect the people 's privacy. The rise of new technology threatens people 's privacy, as they also assist the government 's effort in surveillance. Most people don 't realize every

" Nowadays, it can be perceived by society that the government is in utter control of our daily actions; however, there is a boundary they cannot traverse. Since the internet is ordinarily part of our everyday lives, many citizens of the United States believe the branches of government should be regulated on their extent of viewing internet content. It would be unethical if the government invaded privacy by monitoring our personal messages, facing prosecution based on information gathered without a warrant but, it would be essential if the government monitored folks who already have a criminal or terrorist record trailed behind them.

Twenty-seven years ago, scientists at The European Organization for Nuclear Research created the World Wide Web. Because of this, we now live in an interconnected world that has transformed the way we communicate ( ), the way we do business, the way we live, and the way criminal activity takes place ( ). Here in the United States where privacy and security are such an important part of our national ethos, it is critical that our intelligence and law enforcement (LE) community confront the dangers - as well as producing new-evolving tools, for both digital surveillance and data collection. I believe privacy is important because it secures our nation from both internal threats and external threats, as well as protecting our civil liberties; for without security, we cannot have privacy.

The principle of freedom in the United States of America has always tied with one’s private matters. But with technology advancing at such a rapid rate, the idea of privacy might soon become something from a fairytale. Especially included, is one’s online persona. The American government has begun to derestrict itself from the bounds of an individual's personal matters online. In reception, many Americans feel that their natural given rights are being exploited. They feel that the government has no justifiable reasons to be vigilating information that is not intended for anybody’s eyes except its rightful owner. However, it is truly necessary for the government to observe what citizens are doing online because it protects both the United States

Privacy is a concept idea that could be understood on a certain level. However, according to “The Evolution (Or Devolution) of Privacy by Debbie V.S Kasper, the definition of the word itself changes dramatically base on variety of social institution and the situation that that the term is referring to. There are countless ways to interpret the meaning of privacy, but unfortunately, due to the broad nature of the conceptual structure of the idea, none of the statement has proven to be adequate to use as an official definition. Because of this reason, I strongly believe that privacy in today’s society does not exist anymore. Many studies have suggested that technological advancement is the main factor that leads to the dissolution of privacy,

In addition to government’s involvement in privacy, there are also industry standards that help to dictate privacy rules and guidelines (van den Hoven, 2014). While these are not required by the government, the do provide an additional layer of privacy protection. Such as encryption, security protocols, and constant evaluation. It is up to everyone to continually strive for the highest level of privacy and protection. It is up to individuals to be proactive in maintaining their privacy, to the government to make sure laws are current and relevant, and to the industries to maintain and expanded industry privacy standards. While privacy will always be a concern, with respect to each other and integrity, privacy could be

The security of our nation concerns every citizen, even in the slightest because it impacts their lives directly. The national security of the United States recently presented itself as a larger issue than thought of previously. Recently, the national security has risen to the spotlight for several reasons. Most of these reasons stem from America’s current president, Donald Trump and his ties with foreign countries. Accusations of cyber security breaches which conflicted with national security arose during this past election with Hillary Clinton’s email scandal, but then rolled forward to Mr. Trump’s possible ties with Russia. Suspicions that Trump’s election win results directly from Russian hacking appeared shortly after he took office. The

At that time, the citizens of the United States looked to their government for protection and a sense of security. The government responded with the war on terrorism, which eventually started taking away citizens’ civil liberties and right to privacy; in exchange for the suggestion of national security. Lisa Nelson, author of, “Privacy and Technology: Reconsidering a Crucial Public Policy Debate in the Post-September 11 Era,” considers “the exercise of political authority in the name of preventing harm informs the current public policy debates regarding the proper balance between technology and privacy” (259-260). During the time of the attacks, the Internet and technology were rapidly advancing and becoming part of citizen’s everyday lives. Though most users were leery to give out personal information initially, technology and the Internet evolved to be a normal part of most people’s everyday life. Eventually, users of the internet blindly gave out their personal information for ease of access; whether to make a purchase online or to access something on the Internet with terms and conditions. When users practice this behavior, they have opened the door for the ‘tracking’ of their online behavior, or even worse the vulnerability of their personal information being stolen. Jason Noble, the author of, “US debates security vs. privacy 12 years after 9/11: The search continues for the right balance between

"There is a responsibility for those in a position of power to monitor not only the behaviors observable in the physical world, but also those in the online one. This rings true especially as the line between the world of the web and the natural world grows more blurry. The government must set clear boundaries in order to keep U.S. citizens informed, and more importantly, safe. Internet users have the right to privacy, but there are times when safety needs to be prioritized above all else.

Before the electronic age and even before the inception of Internet, you required great effort to intrude someone’s privacy. And to make it more difficult, you needed to maneuver to where the information existed. And to go there, you needed enough motivation. The vast expanse between you and the information you sought consisted of a geographical separation. And when you finally reached the destination, it took hours, days or even months to finally locate the information you sought in the horde of scattered documents.

There have been concerns about privacy of American citizens for many years but, ever since telecommunications advances mainly through computers, there has been a major concern in society. One contributing factor that affects privacy is the governmental legislations. The classic example of this situation was the implementation of the Patriot Act of 2001 after the 9/11 terrorist attacks. Computer technology was already a part of society during the implementation of this law and were available to consumers. Note that this was back in 2001, so computers were not sophisticated as they are today. One of the purposes of this legislation was to monitor the communication traffic via telephone and Internet lines which allowed federal agencies to collect such data if there were suspicious activities dealing foreign and domestic terrorism (Olsen). The issue of privacy invasion came into play within this legislation when the Center for Democracy and Technology (CDT) stepped in. Their claim was that this legislation or precisely, the attorney general at time, John Ashcroft, wanted to expand the methods of data mining to further extract data usage from the consumer users that would lead this type of surveillance techniques to go out of boundaries when it came

The Internet is used by millions everyday. With so many people using one open platform, a question arises. Should the government regulate or leave it to the people? Both sides are supported by millions. The answer is simple, the Internet should be regulated due to user security, net neutrality, and data collecting.