Brutality Argument Analysis

It’s hard to make people listen. It’s hard to make people want change. And using violence brings a bad reputation to what one is trying to bring attention to. Thus, peaceful protesting and civil disobedience are important tools to positively impact a free society. Accepting the consequences of civil disobedience proves to the world that one will sacrifice whatever is necessary to achieve what they are fighting for, which strengthens their message even more.

Since the beginning of american history there have been peaceful and non peaceful protests. These protests have had valuable effects on American society such as Martin Luther King Jr and Rosa Parks have impacted society greatly and for the better. In my opinion peaceful protests still have negative effects though they are immensely more appropriate than non peaceful protests because peaceful protests often turn violent because people don't know how to act for example Trump Protests.

Numerous times, protests start off as untroubling. In fact, they are beneficial to a certain extent, for they “provide a vent to society and also allow governments to understand better the issues their citizens are facing” (UN News Centre 2012). However, often these protests cross this blurry line and are rendered violent, causing danger to the American people. A recent example of a protest transforming into a riot was the Anti- Trump protest in Portland. These protests started off as being peaceful and allowed the protesters to express their opinions on the issue. However, the protesters eventually became so invested in the matter that it quickly mutated into a riot with people smashing windows, kicking cars, and vandalizing buildings (USA TODAY 2016) .This rapid change from peace to violence is a result of the blurry line between what is considered peaceful and what is considered violent. Due to the few restrictions on both the right to petition and assemble, what is perceived as violent is open to interpretation. More specifically, the protesters may not have deemed that kicking cars and smashing windows was violent; thus, they proceeded with these clearly dangerous activities anyways. Since the unlimited nature of both of these rights leaves a massive gray area in regards to what is

Some opening examples of how peaceful protests are favorable can be seen in the movie “Battle in Seattle”. There was a protest going on about the WTO meeting taking place in Seattle in 1999. The mayor knew that there would be protests. He said “Be tough on your issues, but be gentle on my town.” He was encouraging peaceful protests, stating that citizens had the right to take a stand for their beliefs. Most of the protesters were peaceful and creative, being disruptive was how they advocated to the general public their message. Their protest to get the WTO meeting to stop and to educate citizens was peaceful and effective. They went to extreme measures to stop the meeting, such as linking their arms together to form a giant chain. They stood up and stood firmly for what they believed was right, even knowing what could happen to

Each act of disobedience directs attention towards a specific idea, and prompts the society to talk about it. It also gives licesnse for the liberated members of that society to form their own opinions about the idea. Since the protest harms no one, save the individual who is willing to face the consequences of breaking the law in question. It does not infringe on any other individual's rights. Peaceful resistance to laws has a positive impact on a free society since it educates that society's members and may lead to more liberty for them, which would create a freer

In the United States, the protest has always been an important tool of democracy, a way for the minority to let itself be heard. Take the Civil Rights movement. Today's race relations are better than they were fifty years ago because a relatively small group of people convinced enough of the country that racism was a disease that would kill everything that made America special.

Protest have been used throughout our nation’s history in order to reform or implement the ideas that seem just to our nation’s people. The history of protest in America would mainly be because of the government, either the government would be at war or it would be legalizing and denying laws people just don’t like. Nowadays there are laws that have established Americans’ right to protest. As indicated by the article, Amending the Protest Law ”On January the Legislative and Constitutional Affairs Committee approved government-drafted changes to the protest law (law no.107/2013) following a Supreme Constitutional Court (SCC) verdict on 3 December requiring the Interior Ministry to seek a judicial order before banning any

Peaceful protest leads to both positive and negative impacts on a free society. The main issue of the society isn't just people making bold moves like these, it has to do with people being able to accept them and not deal with it in a violent way, thinking that, that is acceptable and going to solve anything, when it really make it

It is through protest that the government is able to recognize what the people believe. Without this there would be no changes, no reconsideration, and no progress.

For contemporaries, many do not understand why the right to protest the government is important, and if they do so they do not carry out a protest to advocate for their cause. The reasons why many groups like the Black Lives Matter and Women’s Rights groups protest in today’s world is to try and better a corrupted system. The government is deeply flawed currently as there is a lot of power and money to be gained by passing certain legislation or by overlooking the natural born rights of an American citizen. With lobbyists throwing millions of dollars behind candidates, it is hard for the money not to go to the head of an elected official, and most likely as time goes on politicians begin to pass nefarious legislation at the cost of the American public. The public needs to realize that when they suffer at the hand of corrupted legislation, “[i]n the meantime politicians will find his opinions and interests [more important]… and those of other young people all too easy to ignore” (“Not Turning Out”).

But I also think that at certain times peacefully resisting can negatively impact our community. For one, a lot of the times "peacefully" resisting is not all that peaceful. Many riots have been started over various things people don't like. When this happens, a person is imposing their rights on another individual. The other individuals rights have been neglected and trampled. Another thing is, what if the law is put there to help people? If a law is in place to help fellow humans, such as laws stating all men and women are equal regardless of color, or that slavery is illegal, then why protest against that law? Were we not created the same? Were we not all born here on this earth in the same way? Aren't we the same on the inside, if not the outside? If the law is to help another human in need, and it doesn't contradict our current laws and freedoms, then you don't need to protest just because you don't like what the law has to say. Even if protesting does positively impact the community, protesting should be kept to a minimum. We can't go protesting willy nilly over every single little thing. Protesting can become a form rioting and doing anything that is rude or

In these current times, plastered all over the news it shocking images from inequality arguments and protests. Are these peaceful, but sometimes violent protests, sit-ins, and riots really worth the time and effort put into them? Well the simple answer is yes. Yes, because without protesting and alike efforts, there is a zero percent chance of the inequality being resolved. With these movements at least there's a chance that something will be done to fix the issues of inequality. With inequality today, conflicts are seen between different demographics of citizens, the fading of upward mobility can cause conflict, and riots that have pushed for a change of society.

Peaceful protest can be an effective and beneficial way to make a point about how many in a population feel strongly about an issue, yet many protests do not go as intended. The idea is to calmly make your opinion known, to get noticed and to demonstrate the sheer mass of opposition to a particular topic. Peaceful protest alone is not harmful, it is simply a group of people

When government defying crimes occur, such as these riots, they typically aren’t against the perpetrators of oppression but instead against their own neighbors (Genius Records). Ultimately, the rioters are just adding to the problem. The contrary of this statement is that places like Ferguson and Los Angeles, who have had issues with police brutality, did not get the news coverage until people in the cities began rioting, especially after what happened to Rodney King. It was then when they were able to gain awareness and disseminate the word of what was happening. However, neither side will reach their ultimate goal of peace and respect if they communicate in violence.

Some people believe that violent protest do not promote change. They believe that it is just a way for the protesters to get on tv.