VanBuskirk 1 Kamren VanBuskirk Professor Kelly LaFramboise Anthropology 1113 1 December, 2016 The Brutality of the Comanche Indians I argue that the Comanche Indian people were some of the most brutal and cruel of the native American Indian tribes. The very name “Comanche” means “People who fight us all the time”. The word Comanche struck fear in the hearts those on the Texas frontier. The Comanche were famous for the raids they went on, and were feared by many of the settlers. Fighting was a large part of their lives. Warfare played a crucial role in the lives of the Comanche. The Comanche went to war for various reasons, including to gain stolen items, such as horses, goods, and even people that they kidnapped and held captive. In …show more content…
Infants were axed or speared, or hit against a rock to kill them. Females were raped and scalped. Some females and children were taken captive. Many captives did not make it out of enemy country. They were raped and killed on the trail, leaving bloody relics behind for their enemy. Torture included staking men out facing the sun with no eyelids and leaving them. They also used fire to torture. One account tells how they staked out some captured Tonkawa and applied fire to their hand and feet until they destroyed the nerves. They would then amputate the extremity and start the fire torture all over on the wounded flesh. They would cut their tongues out to silence screams. Scalps were almost always taken, many times while the victims were still alive. The dead were mutilated terribly. They cut off limbs, mutilated genitals, decapitated victims after scalping them, and eviscerated their bodies. They believed that this would cripple their enemy for …show more content…
There was a reason everyone feared the “Comanche moon”. When the moon was bright, such as a “harvest moon”, the Comanche were known to raid. However, on the other hand, it should be noted that many Indian women and children were also killed. The army would not only kill the men, but all of them. Also, since the Comanche were so know to commit these acts, almost any violent act was blamed on them. They may not have even committed some of the acts that they were accused of doing. Some have even suggested that whites invented stories to get people to go after the Comanche. One such instance may have been the Matilda Lockhart story at the council house fight in San Antonio in 1840. A Comanche band was supposed to be bringing all of its white captive, but they only showed up with one, Matilda Lockhart, a teenage girl. The story goes that she was horribly disfigured and mutilated, and her nose had been burned off her face. She told of other prisoners, so the officials were going to gold the peace council of Indians hostage until the others arrived. A fight broke out, and when it was all said and done, over 30 Indians were killed. The Indians were then said to torture and burn all of the captives they had to death, including young children. However, in documents and eyewitness accounts, the abuse is not well documented and some authors wonder if that was really the
The U.S Army and the desire for warfare with the Indians was one of the reasons
The development of the Comanche Indian identity is very unique. These people developed without overseas trade, settlement, and modern amenities for the time. Yet, those Native Americans were able to stand up against the developing Anglo Population that was immigrating to their land. The Anglo Population developed differently compared to the Comanche tribes. Even though the Comanche and Anglo people both developed vastly differently, they both had alike developments.
In the Round Valley, Native Americans were more valuable to white settlers as living slaves than they were as merely dead bodies. This further complicates the Genocide narrative, as many white Californians were not seeking to exterminate Indians in the state, but enslave them. While it is true that many white settlers formed vigilante parties and searched for Indians to kill on the Frontier, their reasons can be traced back to retaliation for Native interference in their ranching operations surrounding the Nome Cult Farm. These Indian killing parties were most often seeking retribution for stolen cattle, and their actions were based in racist attitude. Indians were killed and driven off land only when they had interfered with white rancher success in the Round Valley. In all other instances, it was more profitable for whites to take the Indians as slaves rather than kill them. Even whites that were not interested in holding slaves themselves saw dollar signs over the heads of Native Children, and a large amount participated in the Indian Slave
Many people think of the Civil War and America’s Indian wars as distinct subjects, one following the other. But those who study the Sand Creek Massacre know different. On Nov. 29, 1864, as Union armies fought through Virginia and Georgia, Col. John Chivington led some 700 cavalry troops in an unprovoked attack on peaceful Cheyenne and Arapaho villagers at Sand Creek in Colorado. They murdered nearly 200 women, children and older men. Sand Creek was one of many assaults on American Indians during the war, from Patrick Edward Connor’s massacre of Shoshone villagers along the Idaho-Utah border at Bear River on Jan. 29, 1863, to the forced removal and incarceration of thousands of Navajo people in 1864 known as the Long Walk. In terms of sheer
Likewise, The Comanche Empire began forming alliances and agreeing to terms of peace with certain tribes on the plains and were influenced by what these agreements and treaties would bring for the Comanche peoples subsistence. “Treaty of Camp Holmes” signed between the Comanches and Osages and related tribes was the first agreement with the U.S. and plains Indians that kicked off treaties that promised indigenous peoples goods in return for peace and land. “Particularly in this respect was the 1835 treaty of Camp Holmes, in which Comanches granted Osages and the populous immigrant tribes of Indian territory access to their lands in exchange for trading privileges.” The Comanches agreed to treaties that allowed Osages tribe and other parties of the treaties access to their land and to remain at peace with one another, and affiliated tribes, because of the agreement the Comanches were granted new trade networks in
The frequent depiction of the “Noble Savage” trope has many functions, with its main function being to portray Native Americans as sinless uneducated humans and to make their abusers and torturers seem evil and superior, which in most cases the torturers are indeed evil. Bartolomé de Las Casas and Alvar Nunez Cabeza de Vaca use the “Native Savage” trope for different reasons, which makes their portrayal different, and not because they are writing about different tribes and groups of Native Americans. The “Noble Savage” is a very common adaptation of Native Americans, but the definition isn’t as pretty as the name of the trope may seem to be.
The Comanche were a fierce tribe who rivaled the Apaches and eventually ended up pushing them out of Texas. They originally lived in mountains until they acquired horses in the 1600s and became powerful and mobile, thus deciding to move southwest to find more mustangs, buffalo, and a warmer climate. Together with their exceptional fighting skills and horse riding skills, the Comanche quickly controlled most of the Plains region and became very wealthy. They were able to follow the buffalo as nomads and use this animal as a resource for almost everything. They also could trade their buffalo goods with other tribes and make a profit. The Comanche would skin the animal and use it for moccasins, leggings, breechcloths, teepee coverings, and skirts for men and women. The tribe was organized with a war chief and peace chief. The tribe believed in good and bad spirits including the Great Spirit which they would smoke a pipe to. Men in the tribe were warriors and would steal horses from other tribes and people. If they were killed the tribe would kill their horse also and put them in a trench.
They migrated from a mountainous region to the plains were they were frequently encountered with the Jumano, Pueblo and Apache Indians along with the Spanish. The Comanche were such skilled warriors, that they were able to push the Indian groups further south and further west, they kept the Spanish in the southern part of Texas and prevented them from venturing north, and they also gave American settlers a very difficult time. The Comanche were very skilled horsemen. They were the most feared Indians on horses. It is actually said that the Comanche were the best Indian horsemen warriors ever. They had remarkable ability and skill on horses.
The horse left a large impression on the lives of the Plains Indians; however, the real question being viewed is how this animal impacted the lives of, more specifically, the Sioux, Comanche, and Apache Plains Indians. Life before the introduction of the horse was a challenge. The Sioux’s constant migration with the buffalo required long days and created the need for a tool like the horse in order to better the living standards. The Comanche Indians were extraordinary horsemen once the horse was introduced to them allowing hunting and gathering to become more efficient. The Apache Indians were known for their fighting skills and warrior-like attributes. When they encountered the Spanish conquistadors and saw their use of the horse, strong desires for this animal swept over the Apache population and quickly lead to the trade and even theft of the horse. It boosted the abilities to fight for these Indians and provided them with a tool that made them, in their opinion, almost invincible. This information is being derived from a source that covers every Plains Indian tribe and accurately expresses the actions of these Indians. Without a bias, it describes that advantages and disadvantages of each tribe, and in this case, explains the actions of the Apache Indians. Even with this advantage, however, the Comanche Indians still seemed to have an advantage over the Apache Tribe. This efficiency as well as addition to the Indian tribes allowed for these societies to feel more
Japanese soldiers are widely remembered as being cruel and indifferent to the fate of Allied prisoners of war. Cruelty could take different forms, from extreme violence and torture to minor acts of physical punishment, humiliation and neglect. Some prisoners were made to hold a heavy stone above their heads for many hours. Others might be forced into small cells with little food or water.
The European settlement of North America met its fiercest opponent, the Lakota also known as the Western Sioux, who inhabited most of the Great Plains. The Oglala tribe, a branch of the Sioux nation were key in the resistance against the white man. At the heart of their resistance stood crazy horse, a warrior that had no equal. Crazy Horse fought for the traditions of his people, until those same people wearied of war and in some cases, turned against him. Chief Crazy Horse led an extraordinary life and will always be remembered.
The tribes of the Great Plains were not particularly violent when the Spanish first invaded, three factors led to the growing importance of warfare in Plains’ culture. First, was the Spanish colonization of the New Mexico colony which stirred up raids and
Before the arrival of white people to the continent, Native Americans still engaged in war between the various different tribes. Their reasons for fighting each other were drastically different than the reasons they had when fighting non-Indians. Some Native American battles were fought for revenge. The most common cause of war between Native American groups was probably to defend or enlarge tribal territory. Later, their conflicts with white people were fought for trying to prevent the theft of their land, or in raids for food and supplies they were denied. There have been many famous clashes between Indians and the United States government. On November 4th 1791, In what is considered the worst ever defeat administered by Indians to U. S. troops more than 600 soldiers were killed by a force of mostly Shawnees and other Indians. The cause of the conflict was settlers moving into the Indian’s land in large numbers, ignoring Indians rights and demanding military protection if the Indians opposed them. This kind of situation was the cause for many of the largest fights with Native Americans, for example the battle of little big horn (otherwise known as Custer’s last stand) in which Indians that were ready for the arrival of the Calvary killed every soldier under General Custer’s command. A battle which United States
The Cherokee followed the white man's command at gunpoint as they always have even when their was no un point. Torrential rains, rough weather, disease and broken hearts had taken the lives of at least 4,000 Cherokee men, women and children. Journals show soldiers saying this was more cruel than battles they have been on. The cherokee removal was the biggest history for the native tribe the horrors haunt the families of the heart
The Comanches, exceptional horsemen who dominated the Southern Plains, played a prominent role in Texas frontier history throughout much of the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. Anthropological evidence indicates that they were originally a mountain tribe, a branch of the Northern Shoshones, who roamed the Great Basin region of the western United States as crudely equipped hunters and gatherers. Both cultural and linguistic similarities confirm the Comanches' Shoshone origins. The Comanche language is derived from the Uto-Aztecan linguistic family and is virtually identical to the language of the Northern Shoshones. Sometime during the late seventeenth century, the Comanches acquired horses, and that acquisition