William Shakespeare is a master at literature, drama, and even poetry. In his 1599 play Julius Caesar, he shows his literary talents and they shine exceptionally well in Act 3, Scene 2-3 in which he has both Brutus and Mark Anthony speak to the people of Rome about the murder of Caesar. Brutus goes up first and sways the people into his favor by mentioning that he killed Caesar for the safety of Rome but then Mark Anthony with great oratorical skills brings the people into his side with appealing to certain feelings such as pity and other skills such as praeteritio and therefore leads the people into riot and mutiny against Brutus. With this scene, Shakespeare shows many of his intentions. First of all, he shows his mistrust of mobs and mob …show more content…
First of all, Marlon Brando who portrays Anthony in the 1953 version was an extremely accurate depiction of Anthony. The way he moved and talked throughout the speech was what I felt Shakespeare intended for it to be. The way that the scene was shot was perfect, with Anthony high above the people unlike in the BBC and 1970 version where they were only slightly above the people. The 1953 version created that huge height difference to show how more important Anthony is then the people but it also had an even bigger impact for when he walked down the steps to be within the people. In the 1970 and BBC version, Anthony was only slighter higher and therefore only required to walk a little to become within the crowd but in the 1953 version he had to walk a bigger flight of stairs to stand with the people. I believe this is better because it shows the effort that Anthony makes to be within the people and it gives a sense of himself lowering his high status to be one with the people and being a regular Roman instead of someone with influence. Secondly, just the way Brando talked I felt was much more human than Charlton Heston who was Mark Anthony in the 1970 version and Keith Mitchell who played Mark Anthony in the BBC version. Brando started much stronger and with a fiery passion when he began, he asked for their ears and he expected them to listen. He also seems to …show more content…
The people are irrational and angry for they go rioting in the streets and want to hurt all the conspirators. Once they are on the street and they find Cinna the Poet and ask him his name and what he is doing. Once he answers truthfully the mob wants to kill him because he is named Cinna to which he replies he is Cinna the poet but the people reply “Tear him for his bad verses! Tear him for his bad verses!” (3,3,30-31). And this perfectly shows what Anthony has done to the people, he has angered them to the point that they will kill anyone for simple reasons such as just having the same name as a conspirator and this is extremely important because it shows that even though Brutus and the conspirators killed Caesar to make Rome a better place, in the end they made it so dangerous that even a poet is not safe anymore. And in this only the BBC version was able to truly capture that
In Roman history, some elite men held certain values that they felt strong enough to take their life in order to defend it. In William Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar, there are certain characters portrayed to show how a person’s values or ideas can change their behavior and influence some significant decisions. The protagonist of the play, Marcus Brutus, supports this thought by having an idealistic view on the world and by showing his patriotism toward Rome. In William Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar, Shakespeare uses Brutus as an honorable, idealistic man in order to show the depth that a high-class Roman man will go through in order to defend his honor.
Both Cassius and Brutus play major roles in the play Julius Caesar. Cassius and Brutus both plan Caesar’s death. Although they are working towards a common goal, Cassius and Brutus have very different motivations for doing this. On the one hand, Cassius sees it as a way to gain more power for himself while destroying the king and all his power. On the other hand, Brutus believes that in killing Caesar he is preserving peace for the Romans’ future years. Throughout the play, Shakespeare uses different techniques to create biased characterizations of the two men so that readers and viewers develop identical attitudes towards each of them. In Julius Caesar, Cassius is portrayed as a greedy villain while Brutus is depicted as an
Brutus in William Shakespeare's Julius Caesar In 'Julius Caesar', Shakespeare intended us to see Brutus as 'noble'. I wish to review his actions, and the motivating factors behind those actions. I intend to prove that Brutus had a strong and well-grounded character. He had good intentions, however, he made one fatal mistake and that was his downfall. When learn that Brutus is dedicated to the public, when Brutus decides Caesar must die, because he fears his ambition, this comes as a big shock to the Shakespearian audience as well as the modern day audience.
Shakespeare’s complex play The Tragedy of Julius Caesar contains several tragic heroes; a tragic hero holds high political or social esteem yet possesses an obvious character flaw. This discernible hubris undoubtedly causes the character’s demise or a severe forfeiture, which forces the character to undergo an unfeigned moment of enlightenment and shear reconciliation. Brutus, one of these tragic heroes, is a devout friend of the great Julius Caesar, that is, until he makes many execrable decisions he will soon regret; he becomes involved in a plot to kill the omniscient ruler of Rome during 44 B.C. After committing the crime, Mark Antony, an avid, passionate follower of Caesar, is left alive under Brutus’s orders to take his revenge on
In the Tragedy Of Julius Caesar, Brutus and Anthony both presented a speech to the citizens of Rome. Brutus argued why his actions to kill Julius were acceptable while Antony contradicted Brutus’s views, arguing why Caesar should not have been murdered. Both speakers used ethos, logos, and pathos to persuade the people of Rome. Brutus’s speech was mainly based on logic, while Antony’s speech took more of an emotional approach . Overall, Antony had a sophistic style, he was much more artful and cunning than Brutus. He reeled in the crowd like a fish and captured them with his compelling diction.
In the play The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, an honorable man, Brutus, is planning to overthrow the soon to be king, Julius Caesar. Brutus is persuaded by Cassius that Caesar is a liar, too ambitious, weak, and not fit to be Rome’s king. Brutus soon believed Cassius, and they and the conspirators made a plan to kill Caesar. After Caesar’s death, Brutus planned to justify his actions of killing Caesar at his funeral in his speech to the people. After Brutus’s speech, the citizens of Rome were all in agreement that Brutus did the right thing for Rome. Brutus then decides to allow Caesar’s best friend, Antony, to speak in honor of Caesar. Antony speaks, and he convinces the citizens that Brutus’s actions were unjust and turned the people against Brutus.
The tragedy of Julius Caesar is a story of struggle and betrayal; however, in it, Shakespeare conveys messages about human nature. Three of the main characters in the play convey the ways that power corrupts and changes people. Brutus’ attitude towards killing Caesar and rising to power, along with his personality, change throughout the first three acts. Cassius’ need for power makes him lose himself and his humanity. Mark Antony, changed by Caesar's death, rises to power after taking it away from those that killed him. In Shakespeare’s play, The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, he conveys notions regarding human nature and the ways that power changes and corrupts people; he does this through his characters Brutus, Cassius, and Antony.
The most predominate and important aspect In the play Julius Caesar, by William Shakespeare are the speeches given to the Roman citizens by Brutus and Antony, the two main charaters, following the death of Caesar. Brutus and Antony both spoke to the crowd,using the same rhetorical devices to express their thoughts. Both speakers used the three classical appeals employed in the speeches: ethos, which is an appeal to credibility; pathos, which is an appeal to the emotion of the audience; and logos, which is an appeal to the content and arrangement of the argument itself. Even though both speeches have the same structure Antony’s speech is significantly more effective than Brutus’s.
6. In the play, Shakespeare portrays the common man as almost incoherent. The people constantly seem to be easily swayed by the words of each and every important character. Also, all of the common people are followers. Not one stands up to the officials. At one moment, they are saying, “This Caesar was a tyrant,” (3.2.74) and the next they say that they must “tear him to pieces! He’s a conspirator,” (3.3.29), now angered with the retaliation against Caesar.
In the play Julius Caesar, written and preformed by William Shakespeare, there are many characters, but two, Brutus and Cassius, stood out. The play begins in Rome where a celebration of Julius Caesar's victory over the former ruler of Rome, Pompeii. The victory leads to Caesar's betrayal by his jealous companions. Senators and other high status figures are jealous of Caesar's new and growing power, while others, like Brutus, fear the tyrannical rule Caesar could enforce. The conspirators, Brutus and Cassius being the most important, assassinate Julius Caesar and Marcus Antonius, better known as Antony, and Octavius Caesar, Caesar's heir to the thrown, revenge Caesar's
Brutus speaks matter-of-factly about the death of Caesar and has the crowd convinced that Caesar had to die. However, Marc Anthony appeals to the emotions of the people, even getting emotional himself and even crying during his speech. He even goes so far as to show them the mutilated corpse of Caesar to show how he suffered. He is successful in quickly turning the tables and getting them to change their
Antony vs. Brutus The purpose of Act III Scene II was the speeches that Brutus and Antony gave and the effect that they had on the public. These speeches are crucial to the outcome of the play, Julius Caesar, because this is where the role of the public becomes vital. Brutus and Antony has to convince the crowd that they were right in assassinating Caesar. Antony has a harder time of convincing the crowd but he still does exceptionally well considering.
Examining how Brutus and Mark Anthony Utilise Language to Manipulate the Audience in Act 3 Scene 2 of Julius Caesar
After the death of Julius Caeser Mark Antony and Brutus both give a speech at his funeral. Mark Antony's speech is known as one of the most dramatic scenes in the play. Mark Antony was a good friend of Caeser's and believed he was wrongly assassinated and in his speech he makes the crowd believe that too. In Mark Antony's speech his goal is to start a riot amongst the Roman people and he succeeds that when the people of Rome form a mob and rebel against the conspirators believing that Caeser was wrongly assassinated. In Brutus's speech he tries to justify his actions to the people of Rome and make them feel good about having a new leader. Brutus says "not that I loved Caeser less, but that I loved Rome more." trying to turn the crowd to take
In William Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar, Caesar was murdered in Act III Scene 1 by a group of conspirators sent by Brutus. Brutus was a friend of Caesar's , but opposes Caesar's position as dictator. Mark Antony, an ally of Julius Caesar, was devastated by the death of a friend. After shortly mourning, Antony quickly attempts to seek revenge. He plans on giving a speech at brutus funeral with intentions of turning the crowd against Brutus. After Antony's speech the crowd becomes very angry. To control the crowd Brutus addresses them, he explains why Caesar deserved to die. Foolishly Brutus leaves and gives Antony the opportunity to give his speech to the crowd without his presence. When Antony addresses the crowd he appeals to their emotions.