Building A Recommender System For Architecture Related Vulnerabilities

It is not uncommon to find various organizations complaining about security flaws in their information systems. Failing to prevent or mitigate the security flaws may lead to system breakdown, errors, and loss of crucial information. This is why it is important for users of information systems to find the right solutions that can help counter and mitigate security flaws. One common problem with security flaws connected with information systems or networks is that the security flaws occur in multiples. Technological advances have, fortunately, made it possible for people and organizations to prevent and detect such security flaws using security strategies. Layered Security and Defense in Depth are two strategies that can help prevent attacks and protect information systems against security flaws. The two strategies are similar but are based on completely two different concepts. This paper compares and contrasts the Layered Security and Defense in Depth Strategies by explaining how each of the two functions. Additionally, the paper includes an explanation about the advantages and disadvantages of the two strategies.

Since the system/application domain involves business’s mission-critical systems and applications, as well as data, it is important to ensure security of this domain. Failure to do so can result in a large loss of information and can ultimately lead to the cease of productions. This will ensure the protection of confidential data and its integrity. By implementing monitoring software tools, this will analyze any potential vulnerability that may exist on the

A vulnerability assessment is a risk testing process which finds, quantity and rank possible vulnerabilities to threats in as many security defects as possible in a given timeframe. Depend upon organization scope there are many way to conduct vulnerability assessment. This assessment may involve automated and manual techniques.

Security flaws or vulnerabilities have increased and spread rapidly over the past several years. More and more vulnerabilities are being discovered by security experts worldwide. Some of these flaws have proved to be extremely dangerous and lethal as they have caused unmeasurable damages to industries and organizations as well as individual users. Security vulnerability can be identified as a fault or weakness in a product or system that allows an attacker to exploit and manipulate that particular vulnerability and compromise the confidentiality, integrity and availability of that product or system (Definition of a Security Vulnerability ).

Vulnerability scanners can identify security holes of network or to find the potential point of exploit on computer. These scanners detects and classifies system weaknesses in computers, networks and communications equipment, predicts the effectiveness countermeasures and evaluate how well they work after they are put into use.

Threat modeling is the process of optimizing an organizations’ security of their network by finding vulnerabilities in that system, and then deploying countermeasures to protect against those threats should they happen in the future. If a company wants to know what vulnerabilities they may have then threat modeling is an excellent way of determining these threats. An individual threat is when an event occurs that has a negative impact on an organization’s daily operations. (Rouse, 2006). These negative impacts can manifest themselves in many ways from damaging the reputation of that organization to interrupting the functions of that organization. These threats can be in the form of destruction or stealing sensitive data, cracking of weak passwords, malware, phishing, or other scams and frauds. The goal of this paper is to address how the organizations code of ethics and security policies apply, what specific security policies can be deployed, and to identify the impact of asset security standards and governance. I chose Northrop Grumman as the focus of my paper

While strong security standers are necessary, they must be tested from time to time to evaluate their effectiveness. This is where vulnerability assessments come into play; by performing penetration testing on current systems/networks, security risks can be identified and addressed before cybercriminals are able to take advantage of them (Database Security,

Although we may not realize it, so much of our lives are online. Whether it is for work or for media consumption, many of us rely on the internet to get through our daily lives. Therefore, one of the most crucial aspects of computer science as technology moves forward, is the overall security and safety of the software we use. This can range from programs on our computers or smartphones all the way to the social media websites we use. It seems like we are constantly learning about new data breaches that may have leaked our personal information and what is even more unfortunate is the fact that we are not informed of a majority of these data breaches until months or even years after the incident has occurred.

Right now, 37% of Internet users in the US are surfing the web with outdated versions of Java (CSIS, 2015). For organizations that have not paid close attention to cybersecurity in the past, now is your wakeup call. According to a recently released study, the average cost of a data breach in the United States has climbed from $5.9 million to a staggering $6.5 million per breach (Ponemon, 2015). This is enough to not only hurt many organizations, but also cause irrevocable damage to their economic standings. The purpose of this paper is to examine what the root cause for most of these breaches are. From a review of the largest breaches in the past 5 years, I have come down to this conclusion: Unpatched software is single handedly costing American organizations billions of dollars every year in expensive and embarrassing security breaches.

In security engineering, a vulnerability causes errors and weakness to the IT systems. Environment vulnerabilities in combination with an internal or external threats leads to a security failure. For example, vulnerabilities may result from input validation errors, memory safety violations, weak passwords, viruses, or other malware. In recent years, software companies and government agencies have become particularly aware of security risks that vulnerabilities impose on the system security and have started analyzing and reporting detected vulnerabilities of products and services (Ogut, Cavusoglu & Raghunathan (2008).

Defining Vulnerabilities are challenging most of the time, because it is not known what to look for? What is the threat an attacker is interested to take in looking for vulnerability? Most of the cases, when attacker obtains a copy of software or OS they are targeting and conduct their testing in their own environment, there is very little risk in finding vulnerabilities. This situation happens most often, where attacker tries to replicate the real world scenario in lab. However, it is not always possible for an attacker to replicate as the real world scenario is too elaborate and

With reports from the CIO that malicious activity is on the rise, analyzing the system is essential to guarantee that the data that is critical to the organization's success is secured. Since assaults must be executed on a framework with vulnerabilities, I should analyze the system to address concerns, for example, backdoors, patches and updates, security to server rooms, appropriate security for access of data, and so forth.

A scanner regularly organizes referred to vulnerabilities as basic, major or minor. The magnificence of a defenselessness scanner is that it can distinguish noxious administrations, for example, Trojans that are listening in on the ports of a

There are a variety of vulnerability identification factors that are seen as critical. The types of vulnerabilities associated with the Information Technology System depend on the nature of the system itself. Certain rules govern what action should be taken in this step. If the system has not yet been designed, the search for vulnerabilities should concentrate on the security policies of the organization, security procedures, system requirement definitions, vendor and developer’s product analysis. If the system is being implemented the identity of vulnerabilities should to expanded to include more specific information including security features described in the security documentation and results of the security certification test and evaluation. If the system is up and running, then the analysis of the IT system security features and security controls, technical and procedural should be used to protect the system. A table of Security Criteria can be found below:

The quality of the generated tests permits to verify the absence of critical errors in the use cases. The tool is able to build and execute generated tests and detect the problems of all kinds of emitted signals, non-zero program return code and also program hanging.