Burnable Book Summary

Set in the twenty-fourth century, Fahrenheit 451 presents another world in which control of the masses by the media, overpopulation, and oversight has assumed control over the overall public. The individual is not acknowledged and the intellectual is viewed as a fugitive. Television has supplanted the regular impression of family. The firefighter is currently seen as a flamethrower, a destroyer of books instead of a protection against flame. Books are viewed as insidious since they make individuals question and think. People are so shallow to the point that they couldn't care less about alternate events happening on Earth. An example would be when the radio reported an up and coming nuclear war that might be proclaimed on their society, yet the people never stopped to worry about it. Moreover the general population live in a world without any indications of history or energy about the past; the populace gets the present from TV. We begin our story with the narrative of the protagonist, Guy Montag. At the start, Montag takes delight in his calling as a firefighter, blazing unlawfully possessed books and the homes of their proprietors. However, Montag soon starts to scrutinize the value of his life and, thus, his very existence. All throughout the novel, Montag battles with his

There are many standards to assess a society’s level of equality. First, the ontological equality means that all the people are equal in the eyes of God. Second, the equality of opportunity means that all people should have the same opportunities for advancement, and it is judged into the same standards. Third, the equality of condition means to be equal under the conditions that can help the people to achieve their goals. Forth, equality of outcome is the idea about that everyone in a society should end up with the same “rewards” regardless of his or her starting point, opportunities, or contributions.

The Day They Burned The Books is set in the Dominican Republic just before World War I during the 1900s. At that time, the socioeconomic environment of the Dominican Republic was not favorable and it was very hard for the colored people to live there. The story depicts an authority under colonialism. Mr. Sawyer, the father of the narrator’s friend, Eddie, is portrayed as a patriarchal oppressor who not only exploits the rights of the colored natives, but also treats them with racism, abuses and cultural hatreds. His dreadful behaviors towards the colored people can be shown by the relationship between his wife and him, which is like a master-slave one.

Every author interprets and define social equity a little differently. Social equity issues, refers to the distribution of fairness. (Guy & McCandless, 2012). Social equity is rooted in the idea that each person is equal and has inalienable rights. With America’s being a blend of social, religious, economic, and political characteristics, the

This is important because inequality causes unrest and brings about interminable turmoil which can eventually lead to a collapse of a regime or a state. If every human being is given equal opportunities then the outcome after those opportunities were presented, whether it was success of failure, fully rests upon the individual’s shoulders. In case of failure, the government or any other individual would not be held accountable.

inequality, in the sense that not all people are equal and they should not be equal.

Would you risk your life to read a book? Throughout the thrilling novel, Fahrenheit 451, one man does just that, from despising and burning books, to discovering a love of books and the knowledge contained within them. His newfound love of books results in him running for his life. A man who once though he knew what happiness was, soon learns he was far from it. Through these many obstacles, he has evolved from who he once was, to whom he has become.

or fairness within the social, political, and economic perspectives. Equity forms the core value of both

Despotism flourishes in equal societies due to individuals isolating themselves and forming a centralized governing institution. As stated by Tocqueville, “Equality places men beside one another without a common bond to hold them. Equality disposes them not to think of those like themselves…” (485). With aristocracies, a society not concerned with equality, there is a ligature between individuals within each socioeconomic class. For instance, the noblemen associate with noblemen, while the poor associate with the poor. However, with societies based on equality, mankind is no longer divided by their means. The wealthy are equal to the poor in rights and freedoms, but not in monetary wealth. Lacking this unification amongst each other’s

Along with power being spread equally between many people, it should be diverse. It shouldn’t matter your race, wealth, or your gender. Meaning, both the poor and rich should have an equal chance of having power. With the both of these

Second, to apply a public service value that is equity, public administrators must delivery services to all citizens without exception, such as based on their gender, age, culture, educational background, and disability status, etc. In this sense, the equity means also to fulfil human rights and civil rights practice from the government to their citizens. Public services most of the times are the main business from the government, albeit private sectors are nowadays also play in same area to deliver public services. It is because the government cannot provide some services. Bureaucrats and private sectors have obligation to provide services in all sectors and levels. They cannot treat differently the public that already fulfil their obligation,

Book burnings are executed for many different reasons and have occurred numerous times throughout history. In Germany “The book burning of books under the Nazi regime on May 10, 1933, is perhaps the most famous book burnings in history” (2). In Egypt “The book burning at the library at Alexandria which was looted and burned by Christian mobs”(5). Dictators execute book burnings out of hatred they feel for those whose beliefs differed from their own.

The term equality has a deep and meaningful perceptive connotation associated with it. Some people may argue that equality exists in terms of finances and distribution of wealth, but some may associate this term with power. There are individuals who associate it with behavior with individuals based on their race and ethnicity. Every individual has his own meaning for this term. However, no matter how much individuals try to stimulate this term the reality is that the existence of this phenomenon has been, is and will always remain difficult to create. Throughout the human life since the creation of world, equality has never existed. Inequality has always won its war against equality in some way or the other.

There is a difference between equity and equality: in a mathematical sense, equality is about equal parts identical in size or number, whereas equity is a more flexible measure allowing for equivalency while not demanding sameness. Social equity and inclusivity go hand in hand. To recognize a marginalized group means that they are being included in their own way but at the same level a more common group is recognized. Social equity implies fair access to livelihood, education, and resources; full participation in the political and cultural life of the community; and self-determination in meeting fundamental needs. Inclusion and social equity should be core values given the fact that minorities are now becoming the majority; it’s a time to learn and respect other people’s cultures, lifestyles, and ideas.

Equity vs Equality. Over the years, multiple distinguished authors, politicians, teachers, and philosophers have weighed with their opinion. Equality is ultimate state of being equal in all things, including opportunists, states, and rights. Equity, on the other hand, describes being fair and impartial in all situations. Words that are so similar yet, completely different. Equity is being fair, and being fair doesn't always mean being completely equal to everybody. Equality, sounds good however as time has shown equality is only beneficial if everyone has the same advantages and all benefit equally from the system . What happens when everyone does not have the same inborn advantages? We begin to have unfair disadvantages aimed at marginalized people. Equity is the path that as a society, we must take in order to improve.