Equality is the term for treating people fairly and offering the same chances, it’s not all about treating everyone in the same way, but recognising everyone is different, and they all have very different needs, but making sure they are met.
If it is to be achieved, first one must know what equality is. The dictionary definition of equality is the state of being equal, especially in status, rights, and opportunities, but equal is a poor portrayal
This is important because inequality causes unrest and brings about interminable turmoil which can eventually lead to a collapse of a regime or a state. If every human being is given equal opportunities then the outcome after those opportunities were presented, whether it was success of failure, fully rests upon the individual’s shoulders. In case of failure, the government or any other individual would not be held accountable.
Despotism flourishes in equal societies due to individuals isolating themselves and forming a centralized governing institution. As stated by Tocqueville, “Equality places men beside one another without a common bond to hold them. Equality disposes them not to think of those like themselves…” (485). With aristocracies, a society not concerned with equality, there is a ligature between individuals within each socioeconomic class. For instance, the noblemen associate with noblemen, while the poor associate with the poor. However, with societies based on equality, mankind is no longer divided by their means. The wealthy are equal to the poor in rights and freedoms, but not in monetary wealth. Lacking this unification amongst each other’s
Along with power being spread equally between many people, it should be diverse. It shouldn’t matter your race, wealth, or your gender. Meaning, both the poor and rich should have an equal chance of having power. With the both of these
Power imbalances are inherent in most societies and these imbalances control who has what and who has privilege within a society. Imbalances of power create disparities in opportunity and
Burning of books is a sin for those who have knowledge. Burning books is burning knowledge that people could be learning from. When someone burns a book, it’s just like disobeying their parents, guardian, any person who is older than them, or even god. It’s a prevention of gaining knowledge for those who already have it or don’t have any knowledge at all. Burning books is taking away the knowledge of people and is causing the society to replace books with technology.
A world of system designed to keep people in unjust and unequal positions is held in place by several interrelated expression of "power over": political power, economic power, physical force, and ideological power (Bishop, 1994: 36). So, we can say power is defined as a possession of control, authority or influence over others. In terms of power of dominant groups over subordinate groups, we define power as domination of one group of people over another in major important spheres of life. Power inequities have been in existence throughout the history of humanity and the ways of manifestation evolved from extreme overt oppression to subtle, covert oppression. Three major forms of power inequalities discussed in this paper are
In a society, all people have different capabilities as well as the resources they own. However, the distribution of these resources within the society is what is referred as distributive justice. It enables the less fortunate in the community to have a sense of belonging, and it also gives them a say in the society. Through distributive justice, people can peacefully coexist. Distributive justice is also viewed as a way in which things like rewards and costs are shared in a group of individuals depending on their capabilities. Nevertheless, distributive justice has different approaches depending on the situation and the norms of a group in the society. In this case, distributive justice can be applied to promote equity
The in class Rawls assignment focused on justice, and the fairness of how people are treated throughout society. The class, after being broken down into groups, tackled the subjects of why people disagree about what is right, and what is not, and how morals and ethics guides a person’s interest as to what is fair and what is just. As with many things in life, there are two sides to every story. There are people that accentuate the outcome, and those that accentuate the process. Those that put emphasis on the outcome, more than likely see inequality as unjustifiable. However, when the process is emphasized, although the system may seem unequal, it provides everyone with a fair chance.
Second, to apply a public service value that is equity, public administrators must delivery services to all citizens without exception, such as based on their gender, age, culture, educational background, and disability status, etc. In this sense, the equity means also to fulfil human rights and civil rights practice from the government to their citizens. Public services most of the times are the main business from the government, albeit private sectors are nowadays also play in same area to deliver public services. It is because the government cannot provide some services. Bureaucrats and private sectors have obligation to provide services in all sectors and levels. They cannot treat differently the public that already fulfil their obligation,
Every author interprets and define social equity a little differently. Social equity issues, refers to the distribution of fairness. (Guy & McCandless, 2012). Social equity is rooted in the idea that each person is equal and has inalienable rights. With America’s being a blend of social, religious, economic, and political characteristics, the
The term equality has a deep and meaningful perceptive connotation associated with it. Some people may argue that equality exists in terms of finances and distribution of wealth, but some may associate this term with power. There are individuals who associate it with behavior with individuals based on their race and ethnicity. Every individual has his own meaning for this term. However, no matter how much individuals try to stimulate this term the reality is that the existence of this phenomenon has been, is and will always remain difficult to create. Throughout the human life since the creation of world, equality has never existed. Inequality has always won its war against equality in some way or the other.
There is a difference between equity and equality: in a mathematical sense, equality is about equal parts identical in size or number, whereas equity is a more flexible measure allowing for equivalency while not demanding sameness. Social equity and inclusivity go hand in hand. To recognize a marginalized group means that they are being included in their own way but at the same level a more common group is recognized. Social equity implies fair access to livelihood, education, and resources; full participation in the political and cultural life of the community; and self-determination in meeting fundamental needs. Inclusion and social equity should be core values given the fact that minorities are now becoming the majority; it’s a time to learn and respect other people’s cultures, lifestyles, and ideas.