The controversial thoughts of critics and viewers alike, and the differing opinions on the educational moral and veritability of the film “Bury My Heart at Wounded Knee” make it difficult for some to see the educational value in this movie. However, conclusively based on analytical reviews of the movie, and personal opinion, I believe this film is both valuable for the purpose used in our class, as well as not educationally valuable due to the blemishes in historical accuracies and flawed storylines. From the two articles I gathered, the critics provide both a basis for agreeing the film was useful for our purposes, yet also facts to support in opposition, both of which I took into consideration before reaching my final decision. Thus, the knowledge I have obtained from these two sources, as well as the movie itself, have lead me to my claim.
The first article I found (Bury My Heart at Wounded Knee reviewed by The Hollywood Reporter) strongly advocates the pros of the movie, stating “That ... "Wounded Knee" [is] valuable not just for its compelling storytelling but for its unswerving candor.” However, within this article, one of the first aspects that I took notice to was in fact one of the article’s opening statements. It claims that “history is told by the winners,” a valid point that deserves more credit than it currently receives. As mentioned in class, historiography is the theories, studies, and methods behind how individual cultures, countries, and religions
Life has fared well since Gaea and I have lived in this house. There are now others in houses surrounding us. These are my friends that I returned to rescue, International 4-8818 being one of them. He is now called Apollo. We are happy here, all of us. The others are learning, albeit rather slowly, yet they learn to say I instead of we. It is my hope that, before my first child is born, they will all say I so that he or she may only know this and not the cursed we.
Because of offensive language and ideas that are represented in the book, To Kill A Mockingbird, it has been banned in many school libraries and lessons. One of the main reasons that it was banned in school is because of offensive words like the n-word and also because of the fact that the plot is centered around rape. One of the school board members, Kenny Holloway, said, “We can teach the same lessons with other books.” Many people agree with Holloway’s opinion, saying that the same ideas that are represented in To Kill A Mockingbird could be taught with a less controversial book. However, other people say that students are tough enough to handle the story. While many people don’t think that this book is appropriate for school, some people
There has been much controversy over whether or not the novel To Kill a Mockingbird should be banned or not. This novel teaches students about the racism and prejudice of the 1930’s resulting in why the world is the way it is, as well as many important life lessons, therefore it should be continued to be taught in schools. The novel To Kill a Mockingbird should not be banned because it teaches about life in the past and why the world is the way it is now, proving that this novel has the ability to effectively educate kids about the past and potential impact of human behaviour.
Leroy and Norma Jean in the short story, “Shiloh” by Bobbie Ann Mason, are a married couple, and they experience a series of events, which shapes them and determines there future. The final setting, Shiloh, works well to highlight the battles of war to the battles between Norma Jean and Leroy. Throughout the story Mason is focused on the persistency of grief, the instability of gender roles, along with the distance and lack of communication separating Leroy and Norma Jean from each other. Mason illustrates how marriage can be a struggle striving to work out to the very end.
supported a man by the name of Andrew Jackson who was running for President of the
This ‘cult’ had one goal-through monuments and other means-to rewrite history to hide the truth, which is that the Confederacy was on the wrong side of humanity” (p 2). Using a periodic sentence structure, Landrieu puts an emphasis on the fact that the Confederacy was wrong, and people should not follow in its footsteps. The fact that the cult was trying to re-write history implies they know they were wrong and wanted to cover up their wrongdoings. He then goes on to talk about this in a logical sense to persuade the listener, as he then goes on to say, “...these men did not fight for the United States of America. They fought against it” (p 3). In any logical person’s mind, they should believe that it’s better to have someone that is standing up for their country in power, than someone who is not. Landrieu also uses a short and ‘sweet’ sentence to say how these Confederate men were against America’s cause, putting an emphasis on the facts. With his allusions to past events, Landrieu touches on the listeners pathos; while his differing sentence structure and logical remarks relate to the listeners logos. Using these appeals, Landrieu is able to help his listeners truly understand the history and image of the Confederate monuments.
With Hollywood producers jumping all over the idea of making historical wars and battles come to life on the big screen, many times fabricated and over-the-top details are added to enhance the overall plots. Keeping this in mind, I analyzed the movie Gettysburg, directed by Ronald F. Maxwell, for historical accuracies. The battle of Gettysburg was the bloodiest battle in American history, many movies have been made to re-enact the horrors that unraveled within those days; however, many of them are incorrect. The movie Gettysburg, directed by Ronald F. Maxwell, seems to be mostly accurate with the historical events. The defense of Little Round Top was a pivotal moment within the battle of Gettysburg, the winner of this skirmish would decide
As a child, I have always been intrigued about the vast traditions and the colorful histories of various Indian Tribes. I choose Dee Browns “Bury My Heart At Wounded Knee” in order to be further educated about the Native American nations. I was familiar with the piece long before I even knew it was a book by watching and love the HBO special on “Bury My Heart At Wounded Knee”.
A recent hot-button subject in the media has been what to do with Confederate monuments in the South. After the removal of a statue honoring Robert E. Lee, a general in the Confederate Army considered by many to be a hero for the part he played in the American Civil War, a clear divide has formed over whether it was the right thing to do. Some agree with this choice, calling the statues remnants from a time of racial oppression in the United States. Others are outraged, considering it desecration of their proud history. Still others don't understand either side of the issue, and see it as a pointless feud. It is imperative to understand that to many people, these are more than just statues. Whether their impression is positive or negative, this issue goes beyond physical monuments.
The massacre at Wounded Knee was the last action in a long and bloody war that pitted Native American Indians against U.S Military forces. For roughly 300 years the two sides had been in constant conflict across America in a battle for land, resources, and ultimately; freedom. This final massacre solidified the American hold on the west and closed the final chapter on a way of life that can never be brought back. Lakota Indians, having learned of the death of Sitting Bull started to move towards Pine Ridge Indian Reservation in hopes of finding protection from Red Cloud. However, the harsh South Dakota winter weather had different plans, causing Chief Big Foot to become extremely ill. The Lakota came across cavalry forces
The students are right; the textbooks are boring, and they find American history in general is so “boring”.(pg.13) Everything in all the textbooks are already solved; the literature in the textbooks have no suspense; there is no drama to keep the students intertwined in the textbooks. “No wonder the
The book Bury my Heart at Wounded Knee was written by Dee Brown. Dee Brown wrote a handful of books and the central theme around those books were tales of Native Americans and civil war stories. He spent a long time studying different tribes all around the United States. He has brought out the voice of the Native Americans which was muffled and silenced by the army and government. This book brought much awareness to a cause many had forgotten about, and to the shock of many when they realized he was not a Native American. Bury my Heart at Wounded Knee tells the stories of many Native American tribes and their hardships when facing the government, army, and settlers. While reading this book, I came to quite a shock. I learned the point of view that was hidden in history books, the loss instead of the win, and the sadness felt throughout the book that made it unpleasant to read. I believe this book has brought to light the mistreatment of Native Americans in the past, the main hardships including countless false treaties, harsh treatments from the settlers, and the unjust massacres. I found this book to be quite a difficult read but incredibly worth it. It is written in such a manner that you feel immersed, you feel the all the emotions and imagine how everything came to be. It is figurative, but also incredibly factual. In the beginning of almost every chapter, before the actual start, there is small paragraph with the year and the events in that following year, a quote, or
The movie, “Glory” was an exceptional movie depicting the bloody American Civil War and the 54th Massachusetts Volunteer Infantry. Many famous actors starred in the movie, while Broderick portrayed Colonel Robert Gould Shaw, Washington and Freeman portrayed African American infantrymen in the 54th Massachusetts Infantry. The movie presents many historically accurate events, however some parts are flawed and completely false. Especially throughout this report, I will constantly discuss how Robert Gould Shaw was falsely portrayed and the extent of doing so is just to prove a point how wrong the movie is about the Union colonel. Even scenes were swept completely off the movie, though they might have had an important role in the regiment’s legacy.
The Civil War shook the United States in 1861, forcing families and soldiers, both in the North and South, to reevaluate what it meant to live and die under less-than-ideal circumstances. In Drew Gilpin Faust’s essay, titled The Civil War Soldier and the Art of Dying, Faust goes through every change the Civil War made in the standard perception of death and mourning at the time and the lasting implications death in the Civil War would have for years to come. In every sense, the changes Faust outlines were put in place to cater towards the They of Heideggerian thought and ultimately did not help Civil War soldiers and families think authentically about death, but rather shaped social norms that still support the They and prohibit Dasein from authentically anticipating death as a possibility.
It was a common saying of the past that the history of a conflict was told by the victors. That was true then, the losers of the conflict had to rebuild after their defeat and the winners could share their side of the story, twisting it so it would seem that they did no harm and the losers deserved defeat because they were the villains. This is not true today. With the wealth of information at one’s finger tips and the available research opportunities the stories can be untangled and both sides of the story can be told. However, some have held strong to the truths that their side proclaimed and refuse to admit that their victory was tarnished by lies, deceits, and omissions. This very idea is what shaped how