Bus 499 Assignment 3: Business-Level and Corporate-Level Strategies

About GE transportation‘s example, we can see that the strategy came in a good moment, just after the big failure of AC6000 that happened because they misread the market and developed a product that was not solving any special need of their customer and was not foreseeing the future of the industry, that‘s were EVO project ventures, some say that you can‘t make the same mistake twice and certainly with EVO project GE didn’t made that because now they achieve to understand where the industry was going and how they could be the best ones offering a punctual and accurate solution to the specific needs of the locomotive field. After this, they pretend to go further by working in the hybrid engine, that offered a really complex system of batteries that storage the energy produced on breaking to use it as fuel and save big quantities of money and at the same time reducing considerably the emissions caused by diesel and gas.

In today’s highly competitive market, the continuous changes that are occurring in the social, politic and economic environment create serious challenges in the corporate world. Corporations cannot afford to do business as usual if they want to remain in the game and be successful. In order to achieve their goals and objectives, they need to evolve, adapt, learn and apply different new strategies that will help them secure long-run success and performance. Among those strategies, we are going to discuss ten of them and their advantages in connection with corporation’s goals and objectives.

In this paper I will discuss Macy’s Incorporated by analyzing their business level strategies to determine which I think is the most important to their long term success and if I think it is a good choice. I will analyze their corporate level strategies to determine which I think is the most important and whether or not I believe it is a good choice. I will analyze the competitive environment to determine the corporations’ most significant competitor and compare the two companies’ strategies at each level and evaluate which company I think is most likely to succeed in the long term. Once the

Reorganization of his predecessor (Reg Jones) CEO of the year (3 times), CEO of the decade (1979)… Recession of US economy (1981): High interest and unemployment rate(s), strong currency Strong

Also; Citigroup, Inc. another competitor for the GE Company made a total of $64.95 billion in 2011, and when we compare it with GE and SI its earnings where even less in the same year, making General Electric a leader in the industry. With this valuable information GE management can analyze its competitor’s financial statements results and from there they can evaluate their faults and create new ways to increase their annuals earnings and secure their place as one of leading companies in their industry. Another way GE can go forward in the industry is by adapting its services and products to other countries that need them.

GE has to examine what strategy the firm is going to follow. Will the firm’s

Analyze the business-level strategies for the corporation you chose to determine the businesslevel strategy you think is most important to the long-term success of the firm and whether or

In order for a business or corporation to grow and expand at a calculated pace, they must be able to strategize the proper business plan to get there. A strategy is a set of analytic techniques for understanding and influencing the firm 's position in the marketplace (Raimundo, 2001). Having a business

“GE’s commitment to implementing innovative, cost-effective technologies that enhance the customers’ environmental and operating performance.”

GE was entering a new generational era, one where technology is at the forefront of growth and adaptation. Immelt identified Technology as one of GE’s major drivers for future growth which was signaled by his expansion of GE’s R&D budgets. He shifted the importance of Technology within GE by focusing on the R&D projects that offered large scale market potential, reffered to as “Imagination breakthroughs”.

Doing these acquisitions at some certain stages were important to diversify GE technologies and maximize its market share (Immelt, 2005), however, the balancing between growing organically by empowering the company from within and acquiring some companies is even more important for setting up the company directions. Since more than half of the company revenue is derived from its financial services (Company Data 2008), this brings the argument onto the table about the nature of the company making it a financial company with a manufacturing arm.

* Technical Leadership – Immelt identified technology as a key driver of GE’s future growth and emphasized the need to speed up the diffusion of new technologies within GE and turn the corporate R&D into an intellectual house.

• Immelt believed that GE needed to reposition itself to maximize growth opportunities and to achieve growth targets through sound acquisitions.

GE's new position and growth model focuses on areas that are growing in the 21st century, have longer-term capacity, but will show ROI in the short-term as well.

     When Jack Welch was named CEO of General Electric, Welch saw a company in trouble even though the business world saw GE as an intrinsically healthy corporation, secure in its position as a world industrial leader. Welch knew that the company was too large to fail yet GE was too unwieldy to adapt for further growth. The changes he instituted restructured and revolutionized GE and made Welch the most respected CEO in business today. After reading the book there were three parts that really stood out for me.