Question 1 0 out of 5 points Incorrect Nonconsequentialists like Ross believe that Answer Selected Answer: we have no obligation to promote general welfare. Correct Answer: morality permits each of us a sphere in which to pursue our own plans and goals. Question 2 0 out of 5 points Incorrect Utilitarians believe that Answer Selected Answer: an action can't be right if the people who are made happy by it are outnumbered by the people who are made unhappy by it. Correct Answer: an action that leads to unhappiness is morally right if any other action that you could have performed instead would have brought about even more unhappiness. Question 3 5 out of 5 points Correct Egoism as a psychological theory …show more content…
Correct Answer: was in accordance with duty, but not done from duty. Question 9 5 out of 5 points Correct According to Kant Answer Selected Answer: good will is the only thing that is good in itself. Correct Answer: good will is the only thing that is good in itself. Question 10 5 out of 5 points Correct According to W. D. Ross's theory Answer Selected Answer: we have various moral duties that can't be reduced to a single, overarching obligation. Correct Answer: we have various moral duties that can't be reduced to a single, overarching obligation. Question 11 5 out of 5 points Correct The statement that best defines rights is Answer Selected Answer: a right is an entitlement to act or to have others act in a certain way. Correct Answer: a right is an entitlement to act or to have others act in a certain way. Question 12 0 out of 5 points Incorrect Consequentialism Answer Selected Answer: differs from nonconsequentialism because nonconsequentialism denies that consequences have any moral significance. Correct Answer: states that the moral rightness of an action is determined solely by its results. Question 13 5 out of 5 points Correct Kant believed that we should always act Answer Selected Answer: in a way that we can will the maxim of our action to become a universal law. Correct Answer: in
Rights are legal, social, or ethical principles of freedom or entitlement. Rights are the fundamental normative rules about what is allowed of people or owed to people, according to legal systems, social convention, or ethical theory.
Rights are a legal entitlement that people are either born with or obtain at a certain age and it requires certain
With rights I can do all kinds of other things that some countries don't get to do like vote,we get to vote for are president,governor and other leaders in america to help the world to find you we thing with best be suited for the job. Another right is that we have the freedom of speech,which means that I can say whatever I want,when I want and where I want and that is important because some countries don't let you do that they might get punished for doing that.Another right is that you have the right of freedom and life which means you get to pick and do what you want to do in your life and decide things like jobs people just can't pick those for you because it is your
Cohen defines rights as “a claim that one party may exercise against another”(339). He explains that there are many different types of rights: some moral, some legal; some held by a single person, others held by groups; all differing in what the right entitles one to. Above all this, however, Cohen stresses that rights are a concept rooted in morality. They arise out of the necessity for self-governance among a community, providing standards of conduct that beget personal protection and safety. Therefore, the argument continues that the holders of rights must only be those who are capable of comprehending such concepts as morality and duty and right against wrong. After all, standards can only be held to subjects capable of understanding and achieving them. Because humans are the only
The right to decide one’s own fate within a fair social contract, unmolested by aristocracy or ruled by unjust laws.
rights to not be harmed or discriminated by other people. One protects us from violence and
What is the difference between a right and a privilege? A right: is just a claim or title, whether legal, prescriptive or moral. So in other means you have the right to say what you please. A privilege: is any of the rights common to all citizens under a modern constitutional government (dictionary.com). The idea of whether or not healthcare is a right or a privilege has been a question brought up since our constitution. People for years have been fighting for the right for free healthcare. A right is also something that society values so much that we guarantee it to all citizens. It is something that you are born with and die with. An example of this would be the right to privacy which protects US citizens from invasion of property or person without due process. Regardless of who you are or where you come from, you are supposed to be treated equal. A right is also something that no one can take away from you unless for illegal reasons. But, even people who get put in prison do not fully get their rights taken like healthcare. A privilege on the other hand is something granted to you by Church, or the state, and can be removed. And this is normally caused by a failure to do
A right is a concept in which a person has ownership of a metaphysical aspect pertaining to one’s self. That is, a right is a concept that first exist in the mind. Accordingly, where rights are concerned, it is similar to property; however, it cannot be taken away. A right first must be reasoned by the mind, where “the mind has the capacity to gain knowledge of some principles through reason alone” (Snyder, 1986, p. 727). The human mind is able to reason out certain concepts; of these concepts the idea of ownership over something comes into play. Further, the ability to reason out a concept such as right, or rather innate ownership of something is known. For example, the mind is able to reason out that there exists a
What is a Right? Is it an inalienable individual moral or legal code, a fundamentally collective moral or legal code, or could it be, that a right is the sovereignty to act without the permission of others and, as such, doesn’t it carry the concept that by doing so you may not infringe on another’s sovereignty? These questions reflect the conflict societies; in current years, face in respects to Human Rights. This is not to say, that societies are not able to overcome these issues, and that civilisations; current and ancient, have produced documents that have defied the impression that human rights are a new entity.
Kant's concept of morality relies on good will, acting from duty, and categorical imperative. First, he asserts that the good will is always decent and its value will be remained even if it does not attain its moral motives. Second, he claims it is our moral duty that decides the rightness or wrongness of actions not the consequences. Third, Kant urges that categorical imperative is based on reason and it binds us despite of our desires; furthermore, he uses it a way of assessing intentions for a moral action.
Kant’s moral theory is based on the views that one’s action can only be considered good if it’s done in good will, and if it follows the moral
From the proper rights ethical theory the particular proper rights established with a contemporary society are usually protected along with offered the best concern. Protection under the law are usually accepted as ethically accurate along with legitimate considering that a substantial or even lording it over populace gives all of them. Folks may also give proper rights upon others as long as they have the opportunity along with means to accomplish this.
First, let’s define what a right is. A right is defined as something to which a person is entitled. Most American rights are determined by our constitution and the Bill of Rights which never explicitly states the right to vote, but certain Amendments deal specifically with this subject. Next, let’s define privilege. A Privilege is a special
Human rights are universal rights that we are entitled to. It is a freedom that is guaranteed based on the principle of respect for an individual. As mentioned in the preamble of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, human rights are a “recognition of the inherent dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights of all member of the human family is the foundation of freedom, justice, and peace in the world” (Kent, page 80). When asked what our rights are, we tend to get different answers and meanings. Some people recite the rights that they know; but let’s face it, not everyone knows all of the rights that they truly have. The rights we have consist of many things such as the right of having an adequate food supply. The right to
So, what are rights? Rights are legal, social, or ethical principles of freedom or entitlement. They are also the fundamental normative rules about what is allowed of people or owed to people, according to some legal system, social convention, or ethical theory. Controversy broke out among Americans when the organization LGBTQ (supported by the first amendment) in the 1990’s among their proud members. America continues to wonder however: Should same sex marriage be legalized? To answer this, it already has been, But there are so many reasons that support this decision.