Business

To sum up, based on the law of negligence, the issues and precedents, Rebecca could win this case by legal process. Because the defendant ‘Zorba’s’ Restaurant owns a duty of care to Rebecca, the restaurant has breached that duty of care;

The tort of negligence is the term used to categorise behaviour that poses substantial risks to other people and property.

Torts can fall under 3 categories intentional torts, negligent torts, and strict liability. Intentional torts include intentionally

6) Pricing- Setting prices is a critical decision in implementing a retail strategy because prices are a critical component in customers’ perceived value. In setting prices, retailers consider the price sensitivity of customers in their target market, the cost of the merchandise and services offered competitive prices and legal restrictions.

Are the defendant's actions can be counted as intentional, even if he did not want to hit the plaintif?

The first legal concepts we will cover are Torts. By definition a tort is a civil wrong or wrongful act, whether intentional or accidental, from which injury occurs to another. Now when dealing with torts the first question that needs to be answer is a question of liability. There are: intentional liability, negligence liability, and strict

Strict Liability: Tort liability, which is set upon the defendant without need to prove intent, negligence or fault; as long as you can prove that it was the defendant’s object that caused the damage.

(2) In those instances where the plaintiff is not guilty of negligence, he would be forced to bear a portion of the loss should one of the tortfeasors prove financially unable to satisfy his share of the damages.

Jeremy Waldron, a professor of law and society, demonstrates the institution of tort liability and the issues that arises on the desert-based system. With the example of Fate, having to pay a large amount of money to Hurt for a moment of carelessness while doing the same act as Fortune, he shows how tort liability can be unjust and unfair. Two cases present examples of how Waldron would approve and disapprove the rulings.

Rule: The tort of negligence will apply once it has been established that a duty of care was owed, there was a breach of that duty, and damage resulted from that breach.

Tort, Not Torte: A tort is a civil wrong, and if someone commits one that injures you, you can sue for money damages. Intentional torts include fraud or invasion of privacy, while negligent torts include medical malpractice and car accidents resulting in personal injury or wrongful death. You need an accident injury attorney for a tort. On the other hand, you need a fork for a torte, which is a delicious chocolate-iced cake.

Remember: Intentional torts is when a person acts with intent of injuring a person his property or both.

Donna Driver unintentionally ran a red light, and caused a car accident with Vic Victim. Vic sustained severe injuries. Donna’s auto insurance policy with Gekko has liability coverage limit of $100,000.00. Vic’s medical bills alone run close to that, and there’s also his loss of work and pain & suffering to be taken into account. Vic wants to settle the entire case for $100,000.00, and Donna pleads with Gekko to do so since it is obvious that he could recover more than that based on the facts of this case. Gekko tells her that they will only offer $50,000.00, and if it’s not accepted, they will take their chances at trial.

Torts of negligence are breaches of duty that results to injury to another person to whom the duty breached is owed. Like all other torts, the requirements for this are duty, breach of duty by the defendant, causation and injury(Stuhmcke and Corporation.E 2001). However, this form of tort differs from intentional tort as regards the manner the duty is breached. In torts of negligence, duties are breached by negligence and not by intent. Negligence is conduct that falls below the standard of care established by law for the protection of others against unreasonable risk of harm(Stuhmcke and Corporation.E 2001). The standard measure of negligence is the universal reasonable person standard. The assumption in this case is that a reasonable

Presented are four separate cases that have been argued and settled in a court of law. Each of these cases represent a different kind of tort, a tort is a civil wrong or wrongful act, which can be either intentional or accidental, from which injury occurs to another (Hill & Hill n.d.). The torts are as listed, intentional, criminal, negligence, and liability as presented in the four researched cases.