The Masons’ vs R&G Auto Dealership To effectively resolve the dispute between The Masons’ and Rivertown and Gregory Ford & Chrysler, LLC, specific elements of the business law must be considered. After reviewing the details of this case, we will determine whether the Masons were unjustly enriched or if R&G was at fault for tort of conversion. Gaining insight on Georgia contract requirements will be a deciding factor, in whether this case can be settled through arbitration, or if it should be disputed in court through formal litigation. For a business contract to be legal, there are specific requirements that must be met between both parties. In the state of Georgia, the first requirement is for both parties to be in agreement with the contract, …show more content…
At the time of the contract endorsement, Paul was under the impression that his monthly car payments would be under their limit of $400 per month. Prior to signing the contract, Hector reassured the Masons that they would receive a fair price for their trade-in, as well as structure their monthly payments under this limit. Ultimately, some of these false statements from Hector, coerced Mr. Mason into signing the contract. Legal misrepresentation is defined as “failing to disclose the fact(s), the defendant intended that the plaintiff rely on, which results in a false impression” (Larson, 2010). In these circumstances, R &G failed to disclose material facts to the Masons, prior to endorsing the …show more content…
Such damages could include: Consequential damages, Punitive damages, Liquidated damages, and Nominal damages. Consequential damages would require R & G to pay the Masons an amount that puts them in the same position before the contract was performed. While Punitive damages would enable the courts to force R & G to make a payment as punishment for the breach of contract. Liquidated damages would mean that R & G would pay a specified sum, indicated in the contract. If awarded Nominal damages, the minimal amount would be provided to the Masons, if the case was won and the court did not find much financial
Mary McDonald, an 86-year-old woman, was frequently complaining about the high cost of maintenance of her house and high property taxes. She decided to cancel her fire insurance to reduce expenses. Mary’s daughter was aware of her mother’s concern about the property, and she took Mary to the lawyer’s office to sign some papers that would protect her mother. When Mary came to the lawyer’s office, she was advised that the paper she was going to sign was the deed to the property. Mary signed a document. Later on, when the municipal tax bill arrived, Mary McDonald was really surprised to see that the property was in her daughter’s name.
The plaintiff (Southern Prestige Industries, Inc.) initiated an action against the defendant (Independence Plating Corp.) in a North Carolina state court for a breach of contract. The plaintiff alleged that defects in the defendant’s anodizing process caused the plaintiff’s machine parts to be rejected by Kidde Aerospace. The defendant being a New Jersey corporation and having its only office and all of its personnel situated in the state filed a motion to dismiss citing lack of personal jurisdiction. The trial court denied the motion and the defendant appealed arguing that there were insufficient contacts to satisfy the due process of law requirements
-the facts: an anti-nuclear protest group sent an application to seek permission to rent a room. The Alliance hoped to use the room for a dance. The Adjutant general mailed a contract offer to the Alliance, agreeing to rent on specific terms. The offer required a signed acceptance. The day that Cushing received it he signed it and put it in the office’s outbox. The next day Cushing received a call stating that the offer was being withdrawn, and although Cushing said he had already accepted the general stated that it was withdrawn. They brought suit against Governor Thomson. The court ruled that a contract had been formed and Thomson appealed.
In the McTavish case the agent breached a clear term of the contract and is liable to pay back the money to the principal. Stork has also breached his fiduciary duty [loyalty, good faith] to McTavish regarding this
10. Dan hires Eve to perform at Dan 's Club, but Eve later breaches the agreement to accept a higher-paying job at First Star Arena. Dan files a suit gainst Eve. The court will most likley: award damages to Dan.
ISSUE: Is Gary Fox liable for payment of the fee and was he acting only as an agent for the
The issue is whether the appelles, Avanell Looney and Rita Alexander, had acted for or on behalf of J&R Construction at the time of signing the contract.
BIS did not breach duty of care because according to "N.Y. GOB. LAW 18-105: NY Code -Section 18-105: Duties of skiers" 10-11, each skier shall have the duty not to willfully stop on any slope or trail where such stopping is likely to cause a collision with other skiers or vehicles and to yield to other skiers when entering a trail or starting downhill. Craig neglected his duty to both.
In the case of Anthony, a New Jersey resident and owner of a waste disposal company in the state of New Jersey, and his two business associates, Paul and Silvio, whom suffered severe injuries due to a motor vehicle accident caused by a negligent truck driver; they have great standing to sue against the neglectful driver and the company associated with the ownership of the vehicle. Regardless of the diversity of their residency/ citizenship, the affected party can proceed to sue the corporation responsible for the damages caused by their staff and property; reason being that they are protected under the Constitution’s diversity of citizenship, and the privileges and immunities clause. Furthermore, these two constitutional clauses in addition to the commerce clause, dictate the court that the matter needs to be brought to.
In the Final Paper (Case Study) it speaks to the following case and circumstances. Knarles and Barkley are father and son respectively. Barkley is seventeen years old. They operate a facilities maintenance company that regularly does business in the District of Columbia, Maryland and Virginia. The company is based in Maryland. They have a number of contracts with building owners where they have agreed to provide building maintenance to both residential and commercial buildings within the three jurisdictions already mentioned. They receive a monthly payment of $2,000 to $4,000 depending upon the size of the building. They bill the owners for any equipment of a substantial nature that has to be replaced.
Please answer the questions posed at the end of each case study in essay form. Each essay will be judged on your capacity to present strong, logical discussions that support your conclusions.
Elizabeth Blackwell showed herself as a dedicated and diligent doctor during five years of work in Neurological Associates, and made a significant contribution to the profit margin of the partnership. The partners were delighted with hiring Blackwell in 2005 and they introduced her to medical physicians at a conference. But the referral base Blackwell went through was not the result of that investment by the partnership but instead it was the evidence of her professionalism in neurological sphere.
Kate is the owner of a successful business, selling women’s shoes. Her business is expanding fast and she wants to upgrade her business structure to a more appropriate one. What would be your recommendation to Kate and why? What are the factors that influence you with this advice?
The relevant rules are every simple contract must be supported by consideration, a promise to fulfil the terms of a contract is not always good consideration, and the rule that an agreement that is commercial in character can amount to a binding contract
It is sent to a new customer, or an existing customer who has been late making a payment