Business Law Case Study

The contract was for a total of 62,748 jogging suits that would be custom made for girls and boys. The total contract price was for $ 749,103.60 that included the shipping of the merchandise, which would be shipped within six purchase orders. On or about August 29, 1994 they (Goody’s) terminated their contract in writing, which validates a right to cancel. The parties agreed to amend the first shipment date, Goody’s deny that all other shipment dates were to be amended as well. Goody’s feel that there was any “wrongful, unlawful, or without good cause or justification” eras on their behalf.

BIS did not breach duty of care because according to "N.Y. GOB. LAW 18-105: NY Code -Section 18-105: Duties of skiers"  10-11, each skier shall have the duty not to willfully stop on any slope or trail where such stopping is likely to cause a collision with other skiers or vehicles and to yield to other skiers when entering a trail or starting downhill. Craig neglected his duty to both.

In the case of Anthony, a New Jersey resident and owner of a waste disposal company in the state of New Jersey, and his two business associates, Paul and Silvio, whom suffered severe injuries due to a motor vehicle accident caused by a negligent truck driver; they have great standing to sue against the neglectful driver and the company associated with the ownership of the vehicle. Regardless of the diversity of their residency/ citizenship, the affected party can proceed to sue the corporation responsible for the damages caused by their staff and property; reason being that they are protected under the Constitution’s diversity of citizenship, and the privileges and immunities clause. Furthermore, these two constitutional clauses in addition to the commerce clause, dictate the court that the matter needs to be brought to.

I have being living in Montroogermy Alabama for over six months now.I recentlt met the defendent at a local church I have been attending. The defendent has a family owned produce business an approached me about possibly supplying me with new products. He offered me samples of Muscadine grapes. He offered me these grapes or to purchase samples of products with these seeds. The samples I was provided became very popular with my customers. I began to regular orders with the defendents company. As these products becane popular I also began to invest heavily in the advetisement of these products. Due to the ongoing business relationship and after reviewing my investment costs I decided to write a requirements contract. I provided this contract to the to the defendent to safe guard my investments. This contract was clear and concise.This contract guaranteed a price schedule consistent with what I have always paid the defendent for these Muscadine grape products. The contract was presented to the owners son who I assumed was a fair representative of the company. I informed the son that this contract needed to be signed to guareente a continuing business realtionship that implies duty of good faith and fair dealing . The defendent has informed me of a offer from a company in Texas that offered to pay twice the rate for these products with the conditon of a output contract as apart of the deal(case study). Due to a skyrocketing demand for these Muscadine products and this

Jan began a business called “Sunny Daze for Seniors Ltd.”, it “takes seniors on various trips and adventures in and around Edmonton.” She offers biking and canoeing, for both of which she had to rent the equipment. Jan entered two separate contracts, one for five bike from Wes Wheely, and the second for “5 ultra lite, fiberglass, tip resistant” canoes from Boat Stuff Inc., with the stipulation for both to be delivered May first.

Don Willetts is a member at your church and owns a health food production business. He has taken interest and is interested in selling Scuppernog grapes that your family sells. Don started to sell the product and it is quickly becoming a top seller. Don is normally late on his payments but since he is a close church friend he does not get charged late fees. Last week, your son stopped by Don’s store to deliver the products. Without your knowledge, your son signed a contract, requiring the company to keep providing Scuppernong grapes to Don, at its current price. Later, a new company asked you to sell them the product at twice the price, with the requirement to sign a contract with them. You decide this would be

After the running business the Bill and Jill beach the contract and they setup the case in the court and Bill and Jill take the losses from the seller because the seller provide every wrong

The plaintiff, P.A.Kettle, can be expected to argue that the offer of a free trip to Paris, France was an inducement for its agreeing to the contract. The fact that the contract was apparently executed within the twenty-four hour period dictated by Brigitte's comments lends credibility to the Paris deal being part of the contract. The plaintiff will have to prove that it had the right to rely upon the representations made by Brigitte as being those of the defendant, International Widgets. The plaintiff must argue that Brigette possessed the authority to contract on behalf of the corporation and that the failure of the corporation to comply with the negotiated terms, specifically, the free trip to Paris, was a breach of the contract.

"Nicholas Stasi: Cpl. Walker assisted Kevin Hoy in looking for a stolen bicycle that belonged to the DA. Skip looked around the area of the Royal Motel and found the stolen bike locked to a nearby clothes line. Skip was able to get consent to search the apartment and located the key to the bike lock. Skip also noticed paint on the suspect that matched the recently painted bike. Skip was able to make a felony arrest and helped recover a nearly $7,000 bike.

Simon, the manager of the damaged Burger Ranch, inspected the tree, was satisfied with the tree, initialed the receipt, and paid the $150 for the tree. These facts definitively imply that the buyer did accept the goods after he had a reasonable opportunity to inspect it and then made the judgement that it conformed to their satisfaction, therefore legally accepting the goods.

Zorro.com is a clothes retailer selling one of the plaintiff’s good of interest, a Tiffany faux diamond bracelet. Prior to the discovery of the error, Zorro.com charged a cheaper bracelet at $6.90 each on its advertisement. Customers were given a limit of 3 bracelets each and must have a valid credit card. Before customers proceed the order, Zorro.com gives a link to its terms and conditions where customers are required to click an “accept” button. After the purchase, a message is sent to the customer stating the order is subject to the terms and conditions of the service and will be accepted upon confirmation of the availability of the product that has been

The outcome of this case would have been quite different had Indy given the “Certificate of Origin” to Allen and kept the motorcycle. According to our textbook, “Without an explicit agreement to the contrary, title passes to the buyer at the time and the place the seller performs by delivering the goods [UCC 2–401(2)] (Miller, 2014, p. 308). If the motorcycle remained in Indy’s possession at the time of the seize, then the passage of title would not have occurred because the delivery of the goods had never taken place. This would have made Indy the owner of the motorcycle and not been deemed subject to forfeiture as a proceed of drug trafficking.

An apparent agreement was made between John and the owner even though, John’s offer was accepted through a nod and a wink. The wink could be a sign that John could have some fun with Stacey at his house. The owner could sue and be awarded damages if he could prove that an legally binding agreement through a nod will suffice.

Plaintiff Automobili Lamborghini S.p.A. (Lamborghini) and Defendant, American Expedition Vehicles, Inc. (Defendant) are both automobile manufacturing companies that produce high performance vehicles. J.A. at 2. Volkswagen Group owns Lamborghini through its subsidiary, Audi. J.A. at 15. Defendant purchases Jeep Wranglers from the Chrysler Group and customizes them with accessories. J.A. at 25. Starting in 2015, dealerships reported to Lamborghini that they have received phone calls from individuals who expressed confusion over whether a Defendant vehicle was produced by Lamborghini. J.A. at 19. The first caller, a previous Lamborghini owner, expressed confusion over the source of the vehicle

Capital Pty Ltd is inquiring into the Commissioner of Tax’s notice disallowing the tax deduction for bad debt. The Commissioner based the argument on the premise that Capital Pty Ltd is a mere appendage of Eastfield Ltd. This being the case, it is necessary to examine the exact relationship between Capital Pty Ltd and Eastfield Ltd and determine the likelihood of the courts lifting the corporate veil.