Business Owners Vs Yelp Case Study

While victorious, the plaintiff’s believed that the district court had erred in their decision not to award punitive damages. The defendants, on the other hand, argued that the court had erred in denying their motion for summary judgment.

Searching for doctors on Yelp can be helpful. You can read reviews, look at doctor’s pictures and view the inside of their office. It seems great until it’s time to make an appointment. Searching for “ mental health counselor” on Yelp brings you to pages of counselors but no appointment slots, only phone numbers. So people who work late night shifts or off hours would never be able to make an appointment. Another thing that’s not shown? Prices. It never ends well for the doctor or the patient when payments are not clear.

Senior Management of PepsiCo is evaluating the potential acquisition of two companies – Carts of Colorado and California Pizza Kitchen – in order to expand the company’s restaurant business. If indeed PepsiCo decides to pursue the acquisition of one or both, they must decide how to align each of these business units in its historically decentralized management approach and how to forge relationships between the acquired business units and existing business units. In their evaluation, Senior Management is faced with the question of whether the necessary capital investment in order to purchase one or both of the businesses can be profitable for each of the acquired business units, but must

Case 1 is an appeal to the conviction rendered by District Court Judge Bradley on

It also declares an “unfair method for the sake of competition that affects commerce, and also being involved in the deceptive acts which affect commerce, are declared unlawful.” The Don’s restaurant is rather famous and has great market value. This means that there must be competitors in the market for Don’s restaurant to participate in various acts. The truth will be known once the investigations have been made. Injustice and deception for the consumers symbolizes two separate areas of the FTC authority and enforcement. The FTC has the authority to overtake all the unfair techniques of the competition between the businesses (Macaulay, 1979).

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals then affirmed the District Court’s ruling and upheld the preliminary injunction.

The trial court denied appellant judgment against appellees because he found appellees had not acted for or on behalf of J&R Construction.

Creating an adequate monitoring system not only protects the best interest of an organization but the consumer also. Furthermore, without these structured protections for the business and consumers, unethical behavior tends to flourish throughout an organization in several different forms. In the case of the Better Business Bureau, it appears that the proper protections were not in place to protect consumers or the organization should have updated its mission statement to account for the many consumer changes since the use of the internet globalized businesses. Furthermore, the leaders of BBB should have worked harder to ensure that employees and companies were punished for allowing his or her unethical behavior to tarnish the organization’s image.

The case presents that the Court of Appeals overturned the $18.5 million judgment against the company, but W Inc. filed a petition for a re-hearing before the judges against the ruling of the reversal.

The breach of contract filed by McDonalds against Simon Marketing was eventually tossed out of court as the US District Justice ruled the case did not belong in federal court. Simon Marketing filed suit against McDonalds on October 23, 2001 asking for 1.9 billion in damages on charges of fraud, breach of contract, breach of licensing agreement and defamation. Simon Marketing alleged that by keeping them in the dark during the nearly year long FBI investigation, McDonald’s ran a fraudulent campaign to intentionally destroy Simon for its own public relations and financial benefit.” (Anonymous, 2002, para. 3-6).

The trial court judged in favor of Plaintiff, thus, Plaintiff won and Defendant lost. The question of fact was if a contract existed between the parties. The trial court decided that the contract existed, even Ivan was against it, if he had read through Application for Advertising, he would have realized that he was signing contract.

--- The District Court rejected Elliott's criticism and concluded the proper recognition of the necessary and inherent link between a claim of genericide and a particular type of good or service.

With increasing social media pressures, Susannah Winslow, the general manager of Downcity Motors, is considering terminating a star salesman, James Kenton, for his inappropriate Facebook posts about the company. Winslow’s family business, Downcity Motors, owns a few luxurious car dealerships, including BMW, Range Rover, and Mercedes-Benz. Due to Downcity’s upscale clientele, Kenton felt that a recent launch for Downcity’s Mercedes-Benz dealership was lacking the marketing edge needed to communicate the value of its products to such affluent customers (Lopiano and Watson 3). During said launch, Downcity offered its clients free soda on a plastic tablecloth, which was an unacceptable marketing strategy to Kenton (Lopiano and Watson 4). As a result, Kenton shared his frustrations with his employer on Facebook. However, this was not the first time that Kenton wrote negative posts about his company. Overall, Winslow is unsure of how to handle

The decision in the case focuses on a request by a large and powerful franchisee to eliminate the salad bar in a downtown Roy Rogers location. This decision seems