Business Regulation Simulation Essay

The difference between statutory law and common law is that statutory law is a written law where common laws are based on any prior court decisions and are legal binding. For statutory laws the government, state, and local agencies issue written statutes and regulations which eventually become part of statutory law, as for common law it is prior case decisions and rulings that are followed unless a judge finds a big difference in the between the previous case and current case.

saved than in the U.S. due to the fewer restrictions on new drugs unlike the U.S.

1. Give an example of a case that would fall under diversity jurisdiction. Explain all of the key elements of such a case.

Please note that this Assessment document has 8 pages and is made up of 7 Sections.

case brief---Gregory, a comedy writer, entered into a contract with Wessel, a comedian. The contract provided that Gregory would provide Wessel with a 15 minute monologue for his upcoming appearance on the comedy hour and Wessel will pay $250 to Gregory. All performers could make $500 per appearance on the comedy hour. and when Wessel was scheduled to aper on the comedy hour, Gregory informed him that he was unable to provide the monologue, because last time Wessel was asked to make special guest appearances at three local comedy clubs performance during the comedy hour. and Wessel bought lawsuit to Gregory for beach of contract and request damages of $1250.

3. For a crime to be committed, the prosecutor must be able to prove a criminal intent and an overt act to carry out that intent. Jack and Mary agreed to rob a series of banks. Prior to beginning their bank robbery spree, they were arrested and charged with criminal conspiracy. What act did Jack and Mary do that justifies a finding that they committed the crime? Explain.

In the case of Anthony, a New Jersey resident and owner of a waste disposal company in the state of New Jersey, and his two business associates, Paul and Silvio, whom suffered severe injuries due to a motor vehicle accident caused by a negligent truck driver; they have great standing to sue against the neglectful driver and the company associated with the ownership of the vehicle. Regardless of the diversity of their residency/ citizenship, the affected party can proceed to sue the corporation responsible for the damages caused by their staff and property; reason being that they are protected under the Constitution’s diversity of citizenship, and the privileges and immunities clause. Furthermore, these two constitutional clauses in addition to the commerce clause, dictate the court that the matter needs to be brought to.

Please answer the questions posed at the end of each case study in essay form.  Each essay will be judged on your capacity to present strong, logical discussions that support your conclusions.

We were four in our group and we were given a scenario of a patient who was having an anaphylactic reaction from bee sting venom. The group agreed that I will be the primary nurse. As the primary nurse, I knew that I had to lead and supervised our group in responding to the emergency situation at hand. Having played the role of a primary nurse in this simulation, I have gained meaningful experience, which I can use in my future nursing practice.

 Use the Confidential Information with the financial data and valuation tools in the Simulation to

1. Review the case and the three Power Point presentations. Which external environmental issues/considerations should Tad take into account when evaluating the three deals?

For this Student Collective Bargaining Agreement simulation, I was in the Union that was negotiating the terms of the group project. Our group felt that the mandatory items that needed to be negotiated in good faith were the items that all pertained to the details of how the group project was going to be constructed and the guidelines of the group project that our union proposed. Since the group project was seen as a form of compensation it was mandatory we negotiated it with management. The permissible item that our group added was no class the Thursday before fall break. We considered this to be a permissible item, because it was not directly tied to the mandatory bargaining item of the group project and management did not have to be compelled to discuss the item. I think that the items the group project deemed mandatory and permissible were along the lines of the general definition and meaning of those items. I think that the mandatory item being discussed was the group project and that we negotiated that as a mandatory item, because it was an item that had to be negotiated by the group project union and management. I think that no class before fall break does fall in line with what a permissible item is, because management did not have to negotiate this because it didn’t directly relate to our compensation. Management volunteered to speak about and negotiate the idea of having no class the Thursday before fall break, however if they chose not to negotiate this item they

The second action my organization is to sue the offending company under the clean air act. The federal law controls air pollution often making sure that all necessary

Another external risk that may affect the success of the project is legal and regulatory requirements for conducting business ventures in Kuwait. Keurig’s expansion project is very dependent on the company’s ability to partner with Kuwaiti retailers such as the Alshaya Group, supermarkets, and distribution companies. The partnerships with prominent Kuwaiti businesses will serve as Kuwaiti sponsor for Keurig to ensure the success of the expansion. The legal and regulatory problems that Keurig will face in Kuwait include less than transparent regulations pertaining to industry standards, highly bureaucratic procedures, insufficient intellectual property rights protection, and complicated and insufficient public contracting and procurement procedures (U.S. Commerce Service, 2015).

Alumina Inc. is a $4 billion aluminum maker, based in the United States and operates in eight countries around the world. The United States market constitutes of 70% of its sales. The company manufactures automotive components, alumina refining, bauxite mining and aluminum smelting. Alumina falls under the jurisdiction of region 6 of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). As the business manager in Alumina Inc., I am leading the effort in managing a crisis arising out of allegations of environmental damages. (University of Phoenix, 2008) In this paper, I will identify the legal issues and note the legal principles that apply. The result of my decisions will need to ensure that I prevent extensive losses, environmental and