Business for the Glory of God Book Review Essay

White utilizes the Biblical verses to present his plan on business ethics. The reason for that is because he has a strong desire to convey to the reader’s view that God has already given us the principles that we need to monitor for everything in life including business. He states that it “is God we serve and it is God to whom we are accountable” (White, J., 1978). The logic for his principles is to display to the reader that business and God can be collaborated together. I think many people are unconnected to God throughout every day in life and say that to succeed in business you cannot cohere to moral standards. White is trying to prove that this is not true and that if you want to succeed then you need God. Caux uses foundational concepts to present their principles (Caux Round Table, 2010). This is because they feel that “good ethics” are “good risk management” (Caux Round Table, 2010). As a choice of good ethical practices presenting a few difficulties to succeed at business and completely some of the risk

After the completion of reading the book “Business for the Glory of God,” I personally took pleasure in understanding the different characteristics of business and agree with many of the claims made throughout the book. The author Wayne Grudem shares a plethora of applicable and biblical information to consider when observing the business realm. Grudem does an ample job in expressing how business can most certainly be used for the glory of the Lord, which is often overlooked by Christians because normally the business realm is labeled within a secular world to be inherently bad (due to greed, dishonesty, envy, etc.) offering temptations that ultimately lead to sin. For the most part, I believe that Grudem utilizes scripture effectively in order

"Spiritual goods" such as devout knowledge are not good business sense: "How much money," Folly asks, "can he make in business if he lets wisdom be his guide, if he recoils from perjury, blushes if he's caught telling a lie, and takes the slightest notice of those niggling scruples wise men have about thieving and usury?" (114) The traders instead displayed a sophisticated understanding to outfit their gluttony.

In his book, “Business for the Glory of God” Wayne Grudem discusses why business and making a profit from it is not evil and can be used for the glory of God. While this book is not an in depth analysis, it does provide a brief overview of why the author believes that business can be and should be used to glorify God. In the book, the author starts off by posing the question of whether or not business itself is good or evil. Of course, business by itself is neither good nor evil it is the people involved in the business that make it what it is. A person’s morals and ethics will shape how their business operates, whether for good or ill. If we use our business to show people the glory of God, than our business is doing good for the

For this task we are to read the book by W. Grudem, "Business for the Glory of God: The Bible 's instructing on the Moral Heavens of Business." Mr. Grudem examines the Christian side of business which gives an elaborative clarification of what one may experience. He clearly demonstrates that in all the different parts of business, which incorporates benefit, proprietorship, cash, loaning, getting, and rivalry. By and large, the author obviously outlines that individuals who work in the business world are for the most part made to feel regretful, because few individuals think "instinctively of business as ethically great in itself. The fundamental reason for the book was to show that the different parts of business exercises are great and these great things will likewise convey transcendence to God. (www.crossway.org)

The purpose of business, in addition to making money, is production. I believe that production is the purpose of business because it means the production or manufacturing from components or raw materials to produce something new. When you create a product from new materials, new products are created that may make it easier for society to benefit from. Imagine a world where we could only access the materials, tools, and resources that were in walking distance of our living area. I can only imagine that it was hard back in the 1800s for people to get the medicine they needed, the food they needed, or even clothes to wear. Henry Ford has a great opinion on the fact that many people are not fit to do every job, and he touches on the idea of people producing for an exchange of goods that they need. He said, “It is self – evident that a majority of people in the world are not mentally – even if they are physically – capable of making a good living. That is, they are not capable of furnishing with their own hands a sufficient quantity of the goods which this world needs to be able to exchange their unaided products for the goods which they need” (Henry Ford, p. 500 line 30).

In this week reflection journal we was asked to reflect on Laurie’s perspective of being so focused on profits that we miss the bigger picture of God’s plan for us. We was told in this reflection that it is difficult to recognize a step backward in business as a positive occurrence, so what would make us react differently than the people in Matthew 8 under similar conditions today? In this article Matthew 8:34 states that “The whole city came out to meet Jesus. And when they saw Him, they begged Him to depart from their region.”

Like any great researcher, Wayne Grudem began his work in Business for the Glory of God with a question: “Is business basically good or evil?” With the influence of colleagues, mentors and students, Grudem began on a journey to find the answer to the question that has haunted believers for ages through research and the Bible as his ultimate guide. The conclusion he came to and the claim he would make proved simple, yet profound: “…many aspects of business activity are morally good in themselves, and that in themselves they bring glory to God—though they also have great potential for misuse and wrongdoing” (Grudem 12). With this thesis as a metronome setting the pace for the rest of his book, Grudem unpacks eleven aspects of business activity,

Thomasson, the business owner of faith based House Call Company, chose to run his business on his Christian principles. Leaning on the Parable of the Talents to guide his decisions of employee responsibility, training and excellence, he also continues to strive for excellent customer service. He believes that he should live out his faith and that means through his company, not just on a Sunday and Wednesday when he attends church or Bible study with his group of like minded business owners. As it pertains to both his employee and service manager Whiting and his customers it seems he is trying to live out James 2:8-9, “If you really fulfill the royal law according to the Scripture, “You shall love your neighbor as yourself,” you do well; but if you show partiality, you commit sin, and are convicted by the law as transgressors” (NKJV).

In today’s business world many people would suggest that we do what is in the best interest of our shareholders or for some company’s their stakeholders. Or that we should look out for what is best interest of the company. In the former example the company would take a more utilitarian stance, and in the latter a stance of egoism. What about good will, a sense of duty or universal rules that guide business decisions? The 18th century philosopher Immanuel Kant would suggest that these be the only thing that should play a factor when making any decisions, including those made in business.

The business world was not seen as a top priority when it comes to the followers of the Bible. Returning to the reading of The Gospel of Matthew Jesus preaches the following to his disciples: “Truly it will be hard for a rich man to enter the kingdom of heaven. It would be easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter heaven” (Newton, Source Reader, p. 61). This statement shows that a person does not have to be rich or own materialistic positions in order to enter heaven, instead he must follow the commands of God. If one knows that being wealthy (which many times comes with owning a business) is not going to open the gates of heaven in his favor, then why would he be a businessman? If the man knows that God is going to take care of him just as long as he follows in God’s footsteps, what is the point?

The Bible is the ultimate Human resource guild book. It teaches us how to manage people.

Describing the Biblical Dynamics Maxwell’s Leadership Bible Role in Explaining the Organizational Ethics of the Tennin Cleaning Service

The pericope of Zacchaeus examines a fundamental element of salvation in the Lukan gospel. While many have preconceived notions of what salvation looks like, after delving into Luke, it can be seen that there is more to salvation than there might appear; a specific element of this is distinctly pointed to in the Zacchaeus pericope. The story of Zacchaeus demonstrates that one must actively redistribute one’s wealth and lower oneself in order to obtain salvation and enter into the Kingdom of God. First, one must have a firm understanding of the significance of being a tax collector; this will aid in a deeper understanding of Zacchaeus’ actions. Secondly, this idea of wealth redistribution and lowering oneself in regards to power status, is not limited to this pericope and can be seen throughout the Lukan narrative. Lastly, it is important to contextualize this concept, and sift through the process of applying this revelation to society.

Conventionally, the idea that the activity of business is essentially morally neutral and that ethical value must be imposed from outside the activity itself has gained wide credence and acceptance. Business is expected to meet certain external criteria, derived from the prevalent/dominant moral philosophy in society if it is to gain wide acceptance and be deemed legitimate by the society in which it functions and operates. This reluctance to accept the intrinsic morality of