Bystanders Should Intervene Research Paper

Many people would probably say that if they saw an injured person, they would stop to help them. When put in the situation, however, would they actually stop? The United States of America does not require that pedestrians, who are not involved, help the ones who are. This is no excuse not to help, though. Even helping in just a small way could save a life.

If I was the judge in this case, I would refer to the several other cases and verdicts and see if there are any similarities between this one and the others. In bystander cases there is no duty for to assist someone is peril unless you created the danger, but there have been many exceptions to that

Because there is no federal or Florida state law requiring bystanders to help someone in need or to call for help, the teens cannot be charged with any crime. Furthermore, the family and the authorities are frustrated and saddened. The police chief, Mike Cantaloupe, says that he hopes the circumstances of Mr. Dunn’s death lead to legislation that would require bystanders to help in situations such as this one. It seems quite certain that such a law, especially on the federal level, would be beneficial. Bystanders should not be allowed to watch people die and do

Fischer and Greitemeyer (2013) took an applied approach by examining bystander intervention with other bystanders present or absent, in situations of varying

I agree with Miles Lehrman when he said that “A perpetrator is not the most dangerous enemy” because they're not worse than the perpetrator who watched everything that happened and didn't say anything it didn't want nothing to do with what was going on. In my own opinion, I feel as that the person that watched what happened which is the perpetrator is bad as the bystander because they could do the same thing the bystander do.

I have never been in a situation where my actions could prevent someone from being hurt. However, if I were faced with that scenario, I imagine that I would be an active bystander. What I mean by that is I would not ignore them, I would do my best to help that person. Factors that could influence my choice would be the people nearby. If there are others around me that see the situation, I may wait to see if someone else will confront those that are bullying. Or, if I see people who are close to the person being bullied, I may let them handle it instead. However, if no one does anything, I will step up and help. The setting may also influence what I do. For example, if we were in a school and I saw someone being bullied, I would likely

Victims, Perpetrators, and Bystanders. These three varieties of personalities are present in places where troubles arise. Daily, innocent human beings are victimized by the unjust actions done by perpetrators. While this commotion is in procession, bystanders are left to watch the situation unfold. All sufferers hope that a bystander will assist them. Now that’s not the case, bystanders fear various circumstances that may arise. Some of these circumstances could mean life or death. They understand that it is their responsibility to help but they don’t help. This point is confirmed in an article form Ponder Pop Culture, written by All Things PR, it answers “Will we intervene? Nope.”

Psychological studies have shown that many bystanders turn away from those in need of aid. This is sometimes because the bystanders assume that someone else will come along to help, however, studies have also suggested deeper reasons to a lack of bystander intervention. Oftentimes, the group of people that you are with have a significant influence on your behaviors and choices, such as whether or not you would intervene to help someone in need. If the person in need of help is within your group, people will often fail to speak up with the intent of protecting the group’s reputation and covering up the situation (Source A). These group mentalities are extremely dangerous and can be very harmful. It’s important that members of a group remember that they are responsible for standing up to attackers, and that they are protected under Good Samaritan laws for their intent to help others in any dangerous

There’s a lot bad situations that shouldn’t happen and could of been prevented, and people question how is that in their control. Half of any horrible situation could've been prevented with a phone call to authorities or saving someone when they’re hurt and contacting an ambulance. When someone is in need of assistance physically and can’t get help the most common sensed idea is to help them which in humanity should be an instinct. Yet the more bystanders there is the less likely it is that any one of them help.

When it comes to the topic of bystanders, most of us will readily agree that when we see those in peril we should assist them. A bystander is a person who is present at an incident but does not report or assist the person. The problem with bystanders today in our society is that they don’t take action when they witness people in peril and the outcomes are most likely to be assaults or deaths. We tend to believe that bystanders are depraved, indifferent, and heartless but in reality they may be afraid or don’t want to be involved in the incident.

There are many bystanders in situations of conflict because most bystanders do not want to step out. They fear the punishments that

Although many people say, yes bystanders should be able to intervene when there is trouble, a lot of people also believe they shouldn’t be able to intervene when there is trouble. The people that think they shouldn’t intervene when there is trouble is because it isn’t as easy to stand up for someone when they are being bullied, and they may be overwhelmed with something they are already going through and they can’t deal with one more thing. Some people think things like, ‘Someone will surely step in’ (Whitson). It is normal for kids to just pass by thinking that, and someone else truly actually might step in to help. Intervening for young people is very difficult especially when the young girl or boy are shy in some way. For shy kids that are

Police officers are really the backbone of this nation. Without them there would be more violence all around the world. Yes, there is violence that does occur every day, but with the help of officers I feel like there is actually less violence. There are many times where things to get out of control, and shootings do break out, but most the time it’s the officers trying to stop those who are doing the shootings. Whenever there is some type of outbreak violence, law enforcement is there to help stop if not all but some of the violence.

From an early age we are taught to obey authority and respect your elders. It is known to be punishable if you fail to follow instructions of an emergency personnel or even your parents. Your parents don’t need credentials to prove they are your parents but we recognize emergency personnel by their uniforms and badges. In 1994 a young girl in who worked in McDonald’s corporation was stripped of her clothes and her dignity. She listened out of respect for authority not only for the “police officer” on the phone but her manager who was relaying the instructions from the police officer. The end results were that off a hoax that was used as a sexual fantasy from the caller.

When you see that something is wrong, when should you step in? At what risk? Is it worth losing your job for someone else's life? "Doing the right thing requires knowledge of what might be the right action and a willingness to step up and safely intervene when you see something is wrong."(Share Cornell) I think that in the Rodney King incident, Ju should have stepped in and did something. In the movie Battle in Seattle, I think something should have been done about the police officers spraying innocent, peaceful protesters with tear gas. That should not have happened.