CPMGT 302 Week 4 Procurement Planning Paper

Second, always make sure there is an alternative source. As I mentioned before, this is much easier with single source procurement (but not sole source), since other similar suppliers could be able to supply similar products with more or less that same quality as the previous suppliers.

Choosing the most suitable procurement method for the specified construction project is a long term hard decision; it is a

According to the Project Management Institute (2013), plan procurement management is the process of documenting project procurement decisions, specifying the approach, and identifying potential sellers. This step helps the organization determine whether or not they should acquire outside support. If done correctly this step should help the organization know exactly what they need to acquire, how to acquire the appropriate services or products and finally how much it will cost the organization. For example, in the above case study Providian Trust has determine that they would benefit from an outside vendor, they have also decided to go with the Access Plus software to help them achieve their goals. Additionally, they have determined the price and timeframe; the project was to last for 20 months and cost $18

Define selection criteria R/A C/I N/A N/A Obtain a list of approved vendors R/A C/I N/A N/A Call the contractor R/A I N/A N/A Rate and choose the contractor R/A

This paper will explore how Sealed Bidding and Competitive proposals compare against each other. In order to compare them one must understand how, when and why each topic is used. The primary source of federal procurement information and guidance is the Federal Acquisition Regulation, which consists of Parts 1-53 of Title 48 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR). FAR parts 14 and 15 explains in full detail Sealed Bidding and Competitive Proposals. This paper like the federal government will rely heavily on the FAR as a source document to help explain the details of this topic.

Based on the textbook and my understanding, whenever there are negotiations between a procurer and a supplier regarding a competitive bidding, the first thing that might be favored is the scope of the project, meaning both will sit down and discuss the entire project prior the work begins. Meanwhile, during the negotiations, evaluation criteria should be clear, and stated and defined. As the evaluation is based on the criteria stated and the procurer can request or ask the supplier’s opinions on certain specifications and where things can be improved.

In this assignment I will be writing a formal report that will explain a typical procurement process, I will outline a variety of methods of supplier reimbursement and contract relationships; I will also outline the pros and cons of each contract type. As well as this, I will explain a typical supplier selection process through the use of Carters 10 C’s and a typical selection process model.

|  managerial approach of seller, capacity of seller to do the work, and ability of seller to make a reasonable make-or-buy decision.

A Fixed Price contract provides for a price which normally is not subject to any adjustment unless certain provisions are included in the agreement, such as contract change, economic pricing, or defective pricing. These contracts are negotiated usually where reasonably definite specifications are available, and costs can be estimated with reasonable accuracy. A

Procurement by public entities is guided by primary law principles of transparency, equal treatment and non-discrimination, procurement laws sets up an extensive legal framework regarding the procurement of work, supply and service contracts. There are two main reasons for the use of specific procedures i.e. why contracting authorities do not just negotiate or simply buy from the closest supplier. First, it provides for more public accountability and therefore less cases of corruption practices. Additionally, tendering procedures aim to ensure the best value for money by making it necessary for suppliers to act highly competitive. As a result, market mechanisms will help in facilitating the best possible practices. In situations where market mechanisms are not effective, tender procedures might lose their effectiveness as well. If for example there is lack of competition due to certain complexities or as a result of lower bidder interest, negotiations with just one or two suppliers may be the most efficient manner to handle the process. Therefore, we discuss the inherent advantages and disadvantages of sealed bidding and contracting by negotiation as procedural frameworks for tendering.

Due to the fact that procurement strategies are the focal point in the planning stage of all business firms and is a vital

Procurement intends to explore supply market opportunities and to implement resourcing strategies that deliver the best possible supply outcome to the organization, its stakeholders and clients (Kidd, 2005). Therefore, construction procurement exists to purchase a construction project as requirement of firms or organizational entities to achieve its goals. However, the choice to use external resources is the part of firms’ decision-making

The second level is applying the traditional level 2 evaluation criteria of quality, quantity, delivery, price, and service. Quality is a main issue Victoria will need to analyze from each supplier. It is important that the supplier cannot only keep up with today’s demands, but also future demands and technology upgrades for their products. An assessment of the supplier’s management and financial aspects will need to be conducted. This will be a good indication of how effective their supply chain is, especially when dealing with multiple tiers of suppliers. Victoria must take into consideration the price quote she received, relative to how many times they can deliver a week and how long it will take them to receive their shipments.

All projects involve the need to determine whether the project work will be done in-house, external to the organization (outsourced), or a combination of the two. This is called “make-or-buy analysis” and is an essential part of project planning, as well as a tool/technique integral to procurement planning

Organizations need to stop short-term thinking because of the high-risk levels associated with this. Procurement decisions can add a lot of value to a company, but organizations need to think of the long-term implications of their decisions. Purchasing is important to competitive advantage because it increases value and savings for a firm. Purchasing can build relationships, drive innovation, improve quality, and reduce products time-to-market. Suppliers have a huge impact on organizations total costs because most product features come from