CRISPR Is NOT Ethical Essay

On the one hand, some argue that genetically modifying DNA may aid in the removal of diseases. An Article by Amy Harmon, the New York Times National Correspondent, discusses the advancements in gene editing tools and how it's becoming a more promising practice. With the recent success in editing genes, more groups such as governments are looking into funding for these practices. The removal of certain genes form certain bugs may remove diseases and stop them from being spread.In humans, it could help stop spreading diseases spread by heredity. A new tool is being used in order to safely edit dna, “... Crispr provides an effective way to harness it. By encoding

During January of 2013, scientists based at the Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard were able to demonstrate fixed change in human and animal cells using CRISPR-Cas9. This marked a turning point in genetic advancement—though CRISPR was far from mastered, its potential was beginning to show.

Since the 1980’s, scientists observed a unnatural patterns in some bacterial genomes. One DNA sequence would be repeated over and over again, with original sequences in between the repeats. They called this odd function “clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats,” or CRISPR. This was confusing to all until scientists realized the unique sequences in between the repeats matched the DNA of viruses, specifically viruses that target certain bacteria. It turns out CRISPR is an important part in the bacteria’s immune system, which keeps harmful viruses around so it is recognizable and can defend against those viruses next time they attack for an example; kind of like a book one would keep around to look back on for help even though one does not need the book at the time. The second part of the defense mechanism is a set of enzymes called Cas or, CRISPR-associated proteins, which can precisely locate DNA and remove all of the invading viruses. Conveniently, the genes that encode for Cas are always sitting somewhere near the CRISPR sequences kind

With modern technology comes the breakthrough of the decade by altering the human genes. This altering gene invention is called CRISPR/Cas9. However, this invention in the beginning stages of altering genes, began with rats until perfection. The process began early with the embryo stages to edit the genes. With the introduction of CRISPR surrounds a lot of controversy. Some people believe editing genes is playing with the hands of God and refuse to believe in CRISPR. With the article, “Let’s Hit Pause Before Altering Humankind”, by David Baltimore believes CRISPR is a tool with no good intentions. With this information the article should not be published with being against CRISPR.

There are other types of gene editing out there but research shows us that CRISPR is fast, precise, and simple. Researchers are developing a way for CRISPR therapy to help with Alzheimer’s all the way to HIV. There are two categories the researchers and people have put CRISPR in: practical and philosophical. The researchers say that the immediate barrier is practical. During the tests, CRISPR has found targets in other parts of the DNA that need fixing other than the intended part of the DNA. Because of this, it may take at least a generation to ensure that it is safe. Some people oppose CRISPR because the oppositionists say it lets people play god but getting medicine every time you get sick with the same thing obscures the natural order of things. The opportunities are getting pushed ahead for treating cancer, childhood diseases that are genetic, and how to understand diabetes better. The one question some people have is whether it’s right to edit genes that are

The genetic engineering used for genetically modifying embryos and the thought of genetically modifying embryos is a technology that has caused an unethical dilemma within today’s society. This genetic technology comes at a risk, however, the most common way to genetically modify a human embryo, let alone anything living is known as CRISPR Cas9. This tool uses the enzyme Cas9 to cleave onto DNA to cut it, however according to Alex J. Maben a journalist who wrote an article on the flaws of this technology states “’The Cas9 enzyme that CRISPR uses to cleave DNA… could also make cuts where it’s not intended to, potentially causing cancer’(Kaiser, para5). Also, once CRISPR is in the body, it stays in the body” (Maben). This is an ethical dilemma because as stated above the CRISPR tool can cause cuts to

Reviewing the ethical dilemmas on this topic listed earlier, those with some type of religious background will most likely have a harder time accepting this new area of scientific development. Whereas, those who do not involve religious beliefs in their view point may see CRISPR as a revolutionary scientific discovery that will significantly benefit the greater good. Allowing CRISPR to be further research, and hopefully one day used, can greatly impact billions of people in such an amazing way. Living with an incurable disease or having the potential to develop one later on in life can be detrimental to not only the individual, but the individual’s family. Eliminating terminal genetic diseases will not only relieve people of pain and

Therefore, people should consider not only the cost and attainability, but also the possible negative results and impacts on the genes. Despite some noble intentions on the part of a parent as it relates to preventing genetic defects, consideration of the negative impacts of gene manipulation are necessary. Gene editing should not be used to accomplish desirable physical traits. Furthermore, while the benefits to gene modification certainly seem attractive, there is risk associated with the practice. At this stage, it can be argued that the application of an imprecise technology that is not well understood, has the potential to create unintended generational edits. “Given the unlikely success of creating a “perfect” (i.e. presumably genetically error-free) baby, the high risk of collateral damage makes CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing ultimately unethical” (Sas et al, 2017, p. 1). Thus, while gene editing has the potential for positive results, the outcome may ultimately prove to be

CRISPR Cas9 technology should be used to modify human and embryonic DNA because if we have the technology of CRISPR Cas9 and all of the advantages it entails to help people who want to have healthy children and to stop the inheritance of deadly genetic diseases, then we should. I believe the evidence supports my claim because CRISPR has so many advantages in knocking out the diseased gene to stop the passing down of the diseased gene. Although it is still in the research stage, the number of risks including the off target mutations and the generation of mosaics have been very low and close to none which helps the argument against CRISPR of it being unsafe and unexpected. The evidence states

Imagine a world where we can control genetics. What if we had the opportunity to eliminate all genetic diseases in just a few steps. Imagine a society where anyone could flip through a catalog to shop for traits to “design” their child. This may seem a little far fetched, however this imagined world may soon become possible through the rapid advancing development of genetic engineering. New and advanced technology has finally made it possible to access and hack the human genome. New gene editing technology called CRISPR Cas-9 has completely transformed the biomedical field. CRISPR Cas-9 is cheap, precise, efficient and ultimately works on all living organisms. Advanced genetic technology that have allowed us to genetically modify our food and clone sheep, may one day give parents the option to modify their own children. However the idea of one day creating “designer babies” sparks great controversy.

While saving lives is an attractive prospect, several ethical objections have been raised. Firstly, it may be wrong to make major changes to human DNA at all, as it alters the innate nature of humanity. Secondly, the technology has the potential to be used for other, controversial purposes, such as manufacturing humans or enhancing traits. These ethical concerns must be weighed against the benefits of developing this

My first key question I think is important is authority. I think that they should not use CRISPR. I think this because of my religious belief. I think that god made us for who we are and using CRISPR would change who we would be as a person. God created each person for who they are. For example, if someone had autism but they took it away before the fetus is born then they are changing that fetus whole life that God had planned

CRISPR is a new gene editing technology that has recently become popular in the scientific community in addition to the media due to its vast range of applications as well as the controversy that accompanies the topic. Because this is such a touchy subject, it is difficult for the technology to gain traction in the community. It follows that gaining the support of the public is a crucial step if scientists wish to continue the advancement of the technology. One way this can be done is by facilitating communication between communities, specifically, by publishing articles about new information and advancements that emerge, so the public can be educated on the topic of CRSIPR and the field can gain their support.

Secondly, if CRISPR-Cas9 is expensive it could create a huge divide between rich and poor. This divide is already a huge problem currently. According to Pew Research Center they found out the wage gap between upper class and middle class was really large. In 2013, the median wealth of the nation’s upper-income families was nearly seven times the median wealth of middle-income families. This is the widest wealth gap seen in 30 years since the Federal Reserve began collecting this kind of data (Pew Research Center). With gene modification is can be possible that the wage gap can get even bigger. Wealthier people would be able to afford CRISPR-Cas9 and their future children would be the supreme race. Their children would be the made to be the most good-looking and most intelligent. For example, a future parent can make their child over six feet tall and have attractive facial qualities. These qualities would benefit them in the future when it comes to the work force. People tend to hire people that have these qualities, especially in a job in sales and or anything associated with the media. Everyone from middle class and below would be out of luck of securing a job if the supreme race has far more of an advantage than them. Finding work in this economy is hard enough as it is.

Science has made vast improvements and continues to stretch the boundaries of how we as humans can manipulate science to our benefit. One of these examples is CRISPR. CRISPR is a gene editing tool for unborn babies’ DNA. The process of this technology is fairly simple to understand. CRISPR contains a molecular scissor, which is known as an endonuclease. The endonuclease, in this process, will “cut out” the unwanted DNA sequence and will replace it with a preferred sequence . This technology is obviously much more complicated than depicted but it can forever change the lives for those who participate in such practice for their benefit. The question then arises is what type of benefit? Longer life, perceivably better genes, or a more fulfilling