preview

Caesarea Maritima Analysis

Good Essays

The site of Caesarea Maritima contains many unique challenges for archaeological excavations. Ceramics play an important role in discovering factual information about a site. Nonetheless, Caesarea Maritima has a variety of specific challenges associated with it for archaeologists. Not only does it cover a significant section of the coastal region, but the immense harbour over time has been completely submerged in the sea. Along with geographical challenges, there are also historical ones. The site of Caesarea Maritima was inhabited from Hellenistic time until the Crusaders, a period spanning over 900 years. As it was continuously inhabited, throughout the archaeological layers are the remnants of many different cultures. With this in mind, …show more content…

Important discoveries concerning maritime trade was learned through the analysis of amphora found in Vault 1 of area C (Blakely 1988). This article not only focused upon a specific amphora that of Amphora Class 48/49 (Peacock and Williams 1986 p. 196-99) but also other Palestinian and imported amphorae found in the vault. Through the analysis of Class 48/49 information such as where the pottery was made and what goods they were transporting was learned. By studying the minerals found in the fabric of two of the sherds it was discovered that sherd 6.2 was formed in the Avdat region of the Negev (Blackely 1988, p. 38) while sherd 6.3, because of the amount of heavy metals found within identified the amphora as being made in Gaza or the Western Negev (Blackely 1988, p. 38). Coupled with the knowledge that very few examples of Amphora Class 48/49 were found inland while many examples were found in Caesarea, archaeologists theorized that the vessels arrived from the sea via Gaza avoiding any overland travel. In the article it is pointed out the dating for the vessel types is debated. Dates range from the third to the sixth, centuries. Of the Palestinian pottery, the analysis shows they might have contained water or wine, however, no evidence of oil was found (Blackely 1988, p. 39). One of the more common imported Amphora from vault 1 was the Rhodian Amphora (Blackely 1988, p. 41) and they were thought to have carried wine. Because of the large number of imported amphorae identified, the archaeologists hypothesised that the function of the vault was primarily that of a storage facility for international goods. After the contents of the amphora where analysed it became apparent that their purpose was not to transport only one product rather residue from two or more goods was found (Blackely 1988, p. 42). Another key piece of evidence identified was the

Get Access