Rome had never been under a monarchy and only had a dictator during times of war, to keep economic stability. Caesar wanted to be the King without the title of Rome with no term limit. During the late 50’s B.C.E. he won the loyalty of his Soldiers with the treasures and victories of battles in Gaul, which were soon added to the city-states of Rome. With every battle won by Caesar, the Roman consul dreaded his return to the city. Pompey and Caesar fought for control of the consul for many years. When Caesars daughter Julia, promised to Pompey in marriage, died around 54 B.C.E. the rivalry between the two erupted into a civil war within the city. The violence from gangs and riots were so bad they could not hold elections the following year. “Caesar’s enemies convinced the Senate to make Pompey consul by himself, breaking the Republic’s …show more content…
A bronze tablet lay inside the tomb that inscribed, ‘Whenever the bones on Capys shall be discovered, it will come to pass the a descendant of his shall be slain at the hands of his kindred, and presently avenged at heavy cost to Italy’. Caesar was also told tales of the herds of horses, he dedicated to the river Rubico, refused to graze off the land and mourned copiously. Spurinna, a prophet, warned him that danger would find him on a day no later than the Ides of March. Once Caesar was convinced by Brutus to attend the Senate, he walked by Spurinna laughing at him, calling him a false prophet because no harm had found him. This eye witnessed account clearly describes Caesar as a selfish dictator. Caesar had several signs that a form of danger was headed his way, even with passers-by handing him warning notes as he walk to the Senate. Even if Caesar had the intention of reading them he did not take them serious at all, which eventually led to his death at the Senate
This investigation evaluates the question, to what extent did Julius Caesar 's assassination affect Rome, politically and socially. Gaius Julius Caesar, famously known for his brilliant military strategies and shrewd political expertise, helped transform the Roman Republic into one of the greatest civilization in the western world. During his reign, Julius Ceasar expanded Rome’s geographical territory across Ancient Europe immensely, conquering areas of present-day France and Britain. The investigation will primarily focus on the political opportunities created by Caesar 's death, as well as the public reaction, from the immediate ramifications to its long-term effect on the Roman government. Effects in foreign and other civilizations not directly involved with Roman affairs or within Rome will not included in the investigation. Sources for the investigation will include The Emperors of Rome by David Potter and the Ancient History Encyclopedia .
How was it possible that under the dictatorship and after the deification of Julius Caesar the Roman republic fell, when it had been structurally sound for four centuries before? When the republic was established around the end of the 6th century B.C.E., the Romans made clear that they wished to avoid all semblance of the monarchy that had ruled for two centuries before. (T.J. Cornell, The Beginnings of Rome: Italy and Rome from the Bronze Age to the Punic Wars (c. 1000-264 BC), London and New York: Routledge, 1995; p. 215) The rule of the Republic was to be split into powers of the senate and consuls, a system that worked for over four centuries. The republic would face problems with the rise of the first triumvirate in 60 B.C.E.,
Julius Caesar's triumph in a civil war in the 40s BC made him the absolute ruler of Rome he rose to power through his social status, financial support, military leadership, and political reputation. Caesar became the proprietor in Spain, where he gained some military experience and wealth. Upon returning to Rome in 60 BC he joined Crassus and Pompey to form the First Triumvirate, a trio of political leaders.
In Shakespeare's Julius Caesar, one must read the text closely to track the shifting motivations and loyalties of each character as the play progresses. An important factor that must be kept in mind while reading is the degree of loyalty, in other words, the degree to which characters act out of a motivation to help others. Throughout the play, each character's current degree of loyalty to others is clearly exhibited by words or behavior – this holds true for the characters of Brutus, Cassius, Antony, Portia, and Calpurnia. The focus on loyalty is critical because before the play ends an even-handed justice is meted out to a number of people who fail to live up to an expected standard of
to break free, Antony lost the battle but he and Cleopatra managed to flee the battle early
Not only this, but Caesar's stubbornness shows that he cannot be controlled by others, which could be especially dangerous if he is able to wield a great deal of power with no one to dictate how he could use it. Before Caesar, the republic of Rome was ruled through the triumvirate, three powerful individuals that controlled Rome together, taking part in executive decisions together. However, now, after Caesar’s killing of Pompey, the last remaining member of the original triumvirate, Caesar was left to rule Rome alone. As Cassius says, “When could they say till now, that talked of Rome/ That her wide walks encompassed but one man?/ Now is it Rome indeed, and room enough/ When there is in it but one only man.” Never before had Rome been under the leadership of only one individual, and this change is something that could likely bring ruin to the republic, as Caesar could become corrupt and do things that would lead to Rome's decline without anyone to limit his
Julius Caesar was supposed to serve as a priest but was later kidnapped, he was returned safely, but decided to join the military. He had a secret to hide, which was epileptic. During his time in the military, he rose quickly with ranks, because of his personality and skills. He later conquered France, he was also tired of Senate, the Senate did not provide supplies or had even cared for the army. Caesar sets out to threaten the Senate with his army because of the Senate's lack of consideration. The Senate later made him senate leader, Caesar then married the co-leader to his daughter Julia. The co-leader got scared of being killed by Caesar and ran to Egypt where he eventually
Should Julius Caesar have been killed? This question has plagued history for years without a real answer. Julius Caesar was corrupt and all powerful, and his death saved Rome. It really is that simple; he declared himself dictator for life and ignored the Senate’s power. A man with that much power can only hurt a nation.
Brutus, Cassius, Caesar, and the other Senators held the power to do things others could not. With this authority came their ability to use poor judgement. In William Shakespeare’s tragic play Julius Caesar the theme Power Corrupts is arrayed thoroughly. Murder, treason, and ethical/moral corruption were three prevalent themes that proved the overall topic of Power Corrupts.
In the play Julius Caesar, Julius Caesar himself only appears in the first three acts, after which he dies and appears once, briefly, as a ghost. He is portrayed as an old man with many health problems, and barely has a chance to explain his motives. However, Shakespeare chose Julius Caesar to be his title character. Despite dying early in the play and having fewer lines than Brutus or Mark Antony, Julius Caesar, before and after his death, drives the plot of the play and influences the eventual end of the conspirators Cassius and Brutus.
The assassination of Julius Caesar in 44BC by conspiring members of the Roman senate was an effort to remove a dictator whose power had grown to extraordinary levels and to revive the Republic government. Caesar’s power span throughout the entire Roman Empire, which during his reign extended from present day Syria, down into parts of Africa, over to Spain, most of France and all of Italy. He had the favor of the people, military and most of the Roman government. Caesar’s death at the hand of conspirators did remove him from power; however, it did not restore the Republic government as the Senate had anticipated, on-the-other hand it gave rise to yet a more powerful dictator that was beyond what Caesar
In the play, The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, William Shakespeare shows how friends often betray each other. Julius Caesar is about to be crowned king of Rome, when some well-known Romans decide that it is not a good idea for this to happen. They form a conspiracy and kill Caesar. Brutus, an honorable Roman and a very good friend of Caesar’s, betrays Caesar by killing him for the good of Rome. Antony, Caesar’s best friend and another honorable Roman, betrays Brutus by turning against the conspirators. Cassius, a respected Roman, and Brutus betray each other by arguing and destroying their friendship. All this betraying lead to many deaths in the play.
I am sorry. For what my actions have damaged the Republic of Rome and Caesar's own wife, Calpurnia, it was not right at all. I should have never been involved in the conspiracy, and I should've told you what was happening. I guess I was being too stubborn and too power hungry not to really listen to my own wife's pleas. It was just stupid. I was at least.
Imagine being your countries hero, imagine all the people loving you and adoring you, imagine being the best at everything – now imagine Julius Caesar. It seems as though the last one doesn’t fit, does it? However, wasn’t Caesar one of the most influential people during the time of the Roman Empire AND didn’t he influence our world today? As well as in reality, in the play Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, this man has a very interesting role. Despite the fact that he is immensely influential during his life, after his assassination it seems as though Caesar is still influential – or, more specifically, his spirit is.
Julius Caesar is and was one of the most influential people in history. He created laws, stuck wars, and developed new strategies for leadership and battles. "Caesar is widely considered to be one of the greatest military geniuses of all time, as well as a brilliant politician and one of the ancient world's strongest leaders (Julius Caesar pg.1)." He transformed the Roman Republic into the Roman Empire and he extended his land all the way through Gaul to The Atlantic Ocean, as well as fighting a civil war and being proclaimed as dictator for life.