California Gun Laws Essay

The second amendment reads: “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed” (United States Constitution). This amendment was made in order to keep the freedom of the people of the United States safe from a tyrannical government. This is not only inferred from but proved by the words, “being necessary to the security of a free State”.

The Second Amendment removes the definition of militia. It supports the freedom and the security of a person to keep and bear Arms. This is said to be necessary and allowed in a free state, and the rights of the citizens shall not be infringed. No one should have to fear their safety. Whatever measures need to be taken to ensure the safety of the citizens should be taken. The main goal of the Second Amendment is to ensure people’s safety.

2nd amendment is your right to bear arms. This allows you to own guns and use them is necessary. It allow the average citizen to protect themselves and that it was why it was ratified.

The Second Amendment is the right of people to uphold and bear arms shall not be infringed. The Second Amendment is needed today so we can protect ourselves and others.

Ever since the Second Amendment was established, it has become one of the most important rights for a citizen today. In 1789, James Madison outlined the Bill of Rights, adding in the Second Amendment. Initially, it was meant to offer security to anti-federalists who feared that the government might extract too much power. Contrary to popular belief, the Second Amendment is not granting the people the right to bear arms, but instead works as a reminder for the government that it is a natural right for the people. Today, the Second Amendment reads: "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed” (Acosta).

The Second Amendment entailed citizens ' right to bear arms under a well-organized militia. With this, the people of the United States knew that, if their government ever wished to limit their ideals once more, they could defend themselves rather than be harmed victims of massacres. Not only that, but they could defend themselves against dangerous citizens if the time for such ever arose.

California passed some of the nation’s toughest gun laws over the past two decades, and gun deaths across the state have declined by more than half, according to a new study by a California-based nonprofit research group.

California (CA) gun control laws should be revised to provide every CA law abiding person a fair opportunity to purchase and possess firearm for protection. Law aiding citizens who desire self-protection are the ones being wronged. Most criminals do not walk in a store and attempt to purchase a weapon by legally registering for sell and ownership. Many petitions and proposals to legislature have to present to address the

The Second Amendment reads, “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed” (Caplan). “Underlying this amendment are two goals of an individual and collective defense from violence and aggression, which have been recognized by Congress” (Caplan). The second amendment should help secure right of the people to have a gun in their home. “The government should not be permitted to declare who would or would not be able to bear arms on the basis of vague religious tests or any other nebulous standard or artifice” (Caplan).

According to The Second Amendment of the Constitution, the citizens of the United States have the right to own and bear arms, in order to form a well-regulated militia for the security of the states. This right has been discussed for decades as an important issue for the American society, and it has been one of the most controversial issues in the second half of the twentieth century until nowadays. This right germinated with the threat to freedom that the standing army of professional soldiers brought to the Americans. Some argued that the right to bear arms is mainly concerned with self-defense while others argued that this right was implemented to avoid militia disarmament and protect the Free State. This right was

The second amendment in the American Bill of Rights guarantees citizens the right to bear arms. A right that has been very beneficial to citizens since it was amended. It allows the population to protect themselves against governmental tyranny and genocide. The push for stronger gun control laws in America projects more of a problem for citizens than a solution.

The second amendment right is the right to bear arms. Many people agree with this amendment and support it since it is there right. Since its a amendment it should not be treated less than any other amendment. “The First Amendment has never been interpreted as giving "the states" the right to peaceably assemble. Nor has the Fourth Amendment been ruled as providing only protection for state officials from unreasonable searches and seizures. Why should the Second Amendment be treated differently?” (LaCourse). Since the Constitution states that the people have a right to bear arms and hold a weapon, there can be no law that can deprive them of that right. It would violate the Constitution and the rights it implements. “The Second Amendment protects 'the right of the people to keep and bear arms,and the Ninth and Tenth Amendments provide that certain rights and powers are retained by and reserved to the people”(LaCourse). Just based the constitution on this argument, no law will ever break the right that the people can bear arms. It even says that the rights given to the people are reserved to them and can never be taken away from them. It gives a guarantee to the people that they have a right to carry a gun and nothing can be done to withhold you from that right. “It should now be extremely difficult, if not impossible, to construe the Second Amendment any other way than to ratify an

The Second Amendment states, “A well-regulated militia being necessary to the security of a Free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.” The Second Amendment was adopted on December 15, 1791, as part of the first ten amendments in the Bill of Rights. Many arguments have been thrown around saying that the terminology of the Second Amendment is very outdated and the Second Amendment needs to be rewritten or repealed altogether. The right to bear arms gives the people the power to resist a tyrannical government.

Gun-related crime has become a big problem in the U.S. In the past several years there have been several mass shootings where criminals target specific people typically in gun free zones. As a result of these shootings people, have called for all sorts of weapon bans going as far as wanting to completely ban guns in the U.S. These reactions to the mass shootings have been completely unconstitutional and threaten to take away the freedom that many Americans enjoy every day. Gun bans of any sort are unconstitutional and are often created upon misconceptions about firearms in general.

As a response to the San Bernardino Shooting that took place four months ago lawmakers in California are introducing five new bills that are limiting our second amendment right to bare arms. These laws would create more restriction when it comes to owning guns. The bill restricts the sale of semi automatic, centerfire rifle. People who already own these guns will have to register them. They are also outlawing rifles with a detachable magazine because “Since 1980, 435 people have been killed in 50 mass shootings involving large-capacity magazines, some of which can hold 100 rounds of ammunition. Gun supporters are heavily opposing this bill.