Caloric Calorie Free Fat Calorie Content

In Zinczenko’s article he said, "that there are a lack of alternate food options and there are no calorie information charts on fast food packaging, the way there are on grocery items (Zinczenko 394).” This information Zinczenko states may have been true back in 2002 but now of days, government is stepping in. According to the New York Times, President Obama signed off in 2011 that any American patron that enters into a McDonalds, Starbucks, Burger king, or any major restaurant chain, will be required to put calorie information on their menus and drive-through signs. This legislation also requires labels on food items in vending machines. In addition, anyone can find any

• Consumers want to be more nutrition-conscious and the desire for low-calorie products is growing.

Research shows that when such information is given, customers use it to limit the way they eat. This can consume an average loss of calories than they typically did before labeling. This trend poses increased risk, not just in terms of calories, but in terms of unhealthful ingredients such as fat and sodium. According to the passage, "the U.S. government agrees that restaurant meals should be labeled. It is part of the Affordable Care Act of 2010, which requires that standard menu items include information on nutrition 1". This poses that fast food places and restaurants should in fact label information, not only for ones own health but it is required.

If you were to go to a restaurant, you would want to know what the nutritional values of the food were, would you not? The labels you see on bags of potato chips or a drink are called nutritional labels (also known as food labels), which show you how much calories, proteins, fats, or a lot more that the item has. In fact, the government made it illegal to make products to sell at stores without the nutritional label. Did you know that restaurants are not required by law to have a label on any of their products? The government needs to make a law to make restaurants put the nutritional values on their foods.

So in hindsight, the correlation between food and health are not existing. The way we eat will not dictate ate health negatively but will lead our survival and to possibly thrive, then what is the point of all of these Diets and calorie counting, because the main goal is survival.

When you have a dollar in your pocket for lunch, do you chose the tiny side salad consisting of lettuce and a few vegetables, or a warm, juicy double cheeseburger. The burger will hold you off until dinner and is much more convenient for an employee or student on the go while the salad has the tendency to leave you feeling unsatisfied. The answer seems obvious. We are on the go all the time welcome to 2012, with no time to stop and peel an orange or slice an apple. We need pre-packaged fruit salad for a tasty, convenient, healthy snack. What may not be noted is our “healthy” snack is probably packed in high calorie syrup and added sugar. If you’re counting calories you should check the ingredients… who has

The Labeling and Education Act of 1990 was the last major government action involving nutrition labeling, which did not take effect until 1994. This action required that serving size and nutrition labeling to be clearly displayed on packaged foods that were being sold at the grocery stores. Restaurant and other ready-to-eat food were exempted from this new law. But in 2014, twenty years after this action went into effect; the FDA released a proposed rule to renew the nutrition-facts label, which required packaged foods to include the amount of sugar, and to increase the size of the calorie label font, making it easier for consumers to read the labels.

According to him, “There are no calorie information charts on fast-food packaging, the way there are on grocery items. Advertisements don’t carry warning labels the way tobacco ads do” (Zinczenko 463). Zinczenko that fast-food companies are “vulnerable,” and he urges the industry to protect its consumers (464). Zinczenko is right about the need of nutritional information for fast-food; however, common sense dictates that people should know not to eat at fast-food restaurants every day.

The electronic commerce components of the Frequent Shopper Program are aspects of the Sales and Marketing Department’s strategic objectives to increase the loyalty and profitability of its consumers. Under this program, customer shopping trends are identified and rewarded. This in turn can support the objectives providing an inventory selection of specialty foods that their customers’ desire increasing the favorable of repeat shoppers to the Kudler name.

In order to have healthier food products, the government must interfer with our modernization of foods. Labeling is not 100% accurate due to the fact that companies do not want the consumer to know the truth about what all is in their products (Food, Inc.). Meanwhile, industries produce what is selling from the shelf and produce their foods cheapest way to make a profit, even if it is unhealthy. The government is so powerful, controlling, and influencial, that they can convince United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) to ignore the advice of the nutritionists (Politics Versus Science). Congress ignored the objections that the Department of Health and Human Services shared responsibility with the USDA for dietary guidelines and that issuing independent dietary advice might adversely affect agriculture interests (Politics Versus Science). Also, the bad calories are cheaper simply because those are the ones we are subsidizing (Food, Inc.). Therefore, the government must end subsidizing corn and soy, and make subsidizes on more important, healthier products, such as wheat and whole

Some fast-food purveyors will provide calorie information on request, but even that can be hard to understand (Zinczenco, 2002.) The essence of Zinczenco’s s argument is that Americans are unable to be fully informed of the harm the food they consume completely inflicts their health. This backs of the writers claim, that you are unable to place the complete blame of obesity, completely on the consumer. If consumers are completely oblivious to the fact that there food labels are completely rigged, how is it even possible for the consumer to get the truth? The easy answer would be repeatedly placing the blame on the consumer, and saying they should do extensive research on the food which they eat. But in complete honesty, this is a ridiculous standard which most Americans won't bother putting time and effort into. This quote ties back into Zinczenco’s claim that the cooperation which serve such unhealthy food are at fault, for it is they who feed food that can lead to a life altering disease, without properly informing the consumer.

Sadly, Nutrition Facts labels are not generally authentic. For one thing, the law permits a truly remiss room for give and take up to 20 percent for the expressed esteem versus real estimation of supplements. Actually, that implies a 100-calorie pack could, hypothetically, contain up to 120 calories and still not abuse the law. A similar room for mistakes goes for different supplements also, which doesn't look good for diabetic carb counters, people with hypertension who are watching sodium admission, or mothers hoping to support the iron substance of their infants' eating methodologies. The FDA has never settled a precise, irregular name reviewing procedure, and consistence with the law is relied upon to act naturally implemented by nourishment

A passage from Stephanie Rosenbloom read, “This is just another unnecessary government intrusion into private decision-making.” Now that does make sense, if the government did stay out of our private lives, we would be making America worse. It does seem a bit weird that you can buy a Big Mac from McDonald’s for one dollar, but a good, healthy apple is at least two dollars or more. Sam Kazman made an argument that whether he wanted to go buy and apple or a Big Mac, he has a right to buy both of these without any information. I would rather a calorie label on the Big Mac and the apple to compare the difference. If we could just compare the calories to unhealthy and healthy foods we would have a healthier diet if you were trying to eat right. He also made a point that this is just not a federal issue. While this is agreeable, the government does have a right to label whatever they would

Obesity has become a symbol of our American culture and ways of life. Across the U.S. Americans are eating for a multitude of reasons; socially, emotionally, and nutritional. Becoming overweight does not happen overnight, it’s a gradual process that’s ignored. It is estimated sixty-eight percent of Americans are overweight, with thirty-four percent obese. Eating comes easy when the meals prepared are delicious; whether baked or fried, simmered over a heated grill. A large amount of people does not take time out to read the packaging labels for nutritional values in a lot of the foods that’s purchase; the ingredients on most labels are not that hard to understand concerning the calories, sugar, or saturated fat, which is not good. However,

What i mean by this is people with healthy habits look for these labelings to be on their menus because it helps the se how much calories or fats are in a certain food and it's not just people with healthy habits that do this it is everybody a lot of people look for labeling on their menus of their foods. If you read paragraph three of food labeling if states “this trend poses increased risks for all of us, not just in terms of calories, but in terms of unhealthful ingredients such as fat and sodium. Armed With relevant information, consumers can address this risk and be better for