Camden New Jersey Case Report

As we all know, Camden today is plagued by many problems including gun violence, poverty, robberies, and other crimes such as arsons, assaults, rapes, homicides, and auto thefts. Statics show and prove that Camden New Jersey is one of the top most dangerous places to live in the United States in the world today. You 're probably thinking to yourself of how many annual crimes there is a year in the city of Camden. Camden has a total of 4,431 crimes per year, which is a humongous about. With having a crime rate of 87 per one

Poverty and crime has a relationship that goes hand in hand and have been portrayed by specialists from all fields, from sociologists to market analysts. Today, the legislature is attempting to manage poverty and confront the issues of criminal activities as they attempt to build up their nation's economy and society. Beginning from the 1970s, researchers in the US pointed increasingly at the connection between unemployment, crime, and destitution (Steinbuch, 2013). An assortment of social, financial, and mental components may bring about dangerous practices, for example, armed robbery. A sociological hypothesis that states armed robbery might be brought about by variables of social stratification, absence of social portability,

In this research paper, analysis is done to conclude whether the level of education and poverty influence the total crime rate in the United States of America. Using descriptive statistics such a mean, standard deviation, variance, histograms, scatter diagrams and simple linear regression analysis performed upon both independent variables separately, it can be analysed till what extent do these two independent variables, i.e. education and poverty cause fluctuations upon the dependent variable, in what proportion (direct or inverse) and of the two independent

In “Poverty, Income Inequality, and Crime” authors Hsieh and Pugh conducted a meta-analysis of over 30 aggregate data studies. The studies reported variables such as crime, poverty and income inequality. The results of their study showed that poverty and income inequality had a bearing on crime (Hsieh & Pugh, 1993).

It affects the crime because people have to make a living and they turn to crime such as stealing. The families have no money to buy food. So the families turn to criminal actions, to find food.“Low incomes on the other side tend to spur property-related crimes(burglary)”(Stearman, 2002) Jobs are hard to come by in poverty so “Laziness has always been and always will be the root cause of poverty. Idle hands and fatherless homes are the root causes of crime, not poverty.”(Causes and effects of poverty on society, children and violence,2013) Experts have been researching why crime varies over time and space; it is high in specific areas and low in others, usually with huge differences in wealth. However, “Poverty can lead to high levels of stress that in turn may lead individuals to commit thefts, robbery, or other violent acts.(Stearman, 2002) People need to survive and live, they have turned to the crime of shoplifting. People who live in poverty have “two choices; take part in criminal activities or try to find legal but limited source,to income.” “Poverty is tied with violence, criminal damage and also drug use.”(Stearman,

The relationship between poverty and crime can be viewed as a link, but it can also be viewed as a cycle. Lower class individuals are more likely to commit crimes (McLaughlin, 2) so a child who grows up with little money is more likely to have a crime on their record making it more difficult for them to attain quality employment. For this reason they stay poor and their kids are now more likely to commit crimes and stay poor as adults. The disproportionate number of single parent homes in low income areas and the potential lack of control the parent may have on the child could add to the fact that low income youth are four times more likely to commit violent crimes (McLaughlin, 2). A simple explanation for why there is more crime amongst low income individuals is there is a greater need for them to steal because they may lack basic necessities and their only option is theft. A theory I found very interesting was the lack of money can put great stress on a household which can have adverse effects on the children and make them more likely to commit crimes. Although the homes of serial killers are not necessarily poor they are often broken and the effects this has on the killers are very

According to the FBI, “the 2012 rate of violent crime known to law enforcement within metropolitan areas was 409.4 per 100,000 persons. The rate of violent crime per 100,000 persons in cities outside metropolitan areas was 380.4, and for non-metropolitan counties it was 177.0.” These FBI statistics show the difference in the amount of crime between the poor who live in metropolitan areas, and the better off individuals who live outside of the metropolitan areas. There is more than double the amount of violent crime for people in metropolitan areas than people in non-metropolitan counties. This makes it harder for people in poverty to have equal success when they have to watch their back at all times and the rich are almost completely removed from violent crime. According to Ward (2015),The relationship between poverty and crime is visible because they are”geographically concentrated” which means that they can both be found in the exact same places.This means that the connection between poverty and crime is not a coincidence. Due to a lack of resources, some people turn to crime as a way to provide for themselves and their families. The temptation of obtaining power this way is not present among people who do not grow up in poverty. Instead, they have an abundance of

The paper revealed that a reduction in wages of highly educated men contributed to a 19 percent increase in violent crime. They also estimated that a 3 percent increase in unemployment rate causes 10 percent increase in crime rate. The second of part of their research used micro-level data and controlled for the likelihood effects of individual characteristics on criminal behavior. Using this approach they estimated that a rise in property crime is associated with a decrease in wages and rise in the unemployment rate among less

Violence is one of the biggest problems in the United States, having consequences that affect not only one but multiple individuals at a time. Crimes, such as robberies from a bank, not only affect the bank company being stolen from but the people that kept their savings in these banks. Many ask questions to find out whether or not a person, residing in America, and their economic status interconnect with the number of crimes being committed. When trying to find out whether this is really true, researchers have to take on the perspectives of both teens and adults. Along with these perspectives, researchers have to collect data possible from all sources possible to find the correlations between poverty and crime/violence. Subsequently, the factors

     The small community of Hasbrouck Heights, NJ is the one square mile home to a comparatively tiny population of approximately 7,600 people, including myself. I live on a residential street of this small suburban town where a great threat of danger and harm has never really been associated with its name. The crime rate on the city-data.com crime index is a minute 35.6 when compared to the U.S. average of 330.6. In the year of 2002 Wood-Ridge did not experience any murders, rapes, or robberies, and only 1 assault, 35 larceny counts, and 7 auto thefts. This is the main reason why all parties who were surveyed either felt very safe or somewhat safe living their lives

There are other independent variables we have included to help us with a more precise regression. We include state population, unemployment rate, income per capital, Number of police officer per 10,000 population in our data set. In our assumption, as population increase crime rate will go up cause by the lack of resources, similarly as unemployment rate and income per capital, less resources tend to cause more crime. On the other hand, we are assuming better police coverage can reduce numbers of crime.

Hannon, Analyzes the level of poverty present in neighbourhoods in Austin, Texas and Seattle, Washington and the rates of property crime in those areas. Hannon looks for any correlation between the data he is analyzing to determine if poverty does in fact have a strong positive effect on crime rates.

In order to test the truth of our hypothesis, we compiled a cross-sectional data set using public resources provided by the United States Census Bureau, and converted them into Stata format (as we have been doing in class). After rigorously checking the data set we had gathered for issues that would impact the significance of a regression analysis such as multicollinearity, we concluded that the data set showed no serious issues and proceeded to test different transformations of the dependent and independent variable, before settling on the most significant and logical options. We then carried out the process of economic analysis, checking to see if our results for their logical consistency as well as economic validity, fine-tuning our regression in order to garner the most rigorous interpretation of the data. After extensive work our analysis reached not only highly significant, but also highly satisfying results, yielding a confirmation of both our hypothesis of the relationship between the frequency of crime and household income, but also our auxiliary expectations for the coefficients of the other independent variables.

It’s no surprise that poverty and crime rates are positively correlated. Through hypothesis testing Judith R. Blau and Peter M. Blau concluded “High rates of criminal violence are apparently the price of racial and economic inequalities. In a society founded on the principle that all men are created equal economic inequalities rooted in ascribed positions violate the spirit of democracy and are likely to create alienation, despair, and conflict. The hypothesis derived from this assumption, which is also deducible from a general sociological theory, is that racial socioeconomic inequalities are a major source of much criminal violence.”() These findings are significant in proving that United States economic inequality does cause conflict. According to a 2010 wealth spread chart the top 5% of Americans posses 74.2% of the nations wealth. With a wealth spread like this, conflict is bound to arise. A famous study done by Shaw and McKay in (1942) compared delinquency rates in various areas within 21 cities and showed that the same variations in delinquency among socioeconomically different urban areas persisted for several decades even though their populations and ethnic compositions completely changed during that time. This study concluded that poverty is a main factor for delinquency rates. () Numerous of other studies have observed the highest crime rates in the poorest of areas. In the poorest of areas people need to do what they can to make ends meet. Crime is a necessity to some individual in order to feed their families and is not always necessarily done out of hate. Time and time again this can be proven especially when natural disasters occur. People lose everything and desperate times call for desperate measures, which usually involves looting. Money is everything in this world

Crime and poverty often seem to go hand in hand in the modern world, or so is the perception. With poverty rates edging higher this is even more important in our modern day. The unemployment rate is one of the key indicators of the health of our economy. The standard of living for most people falls greatly once they have reached the poverty rate, which makes people live nervously, frantically, and gives greater incentive for them to commit a crime possibly just to get by. In 2007 when the major economic recession took place, the unemployment rate started to rise steadily, peaking at an annual average of 10% in 2009, which was 5% higher than the average the four years prior.1