Can Children Be Damaged By Tv Commercials

I myself, with children of my own, dissagree with the idea that advertisment is bad for kids. I do agree that some ads are inapropriate and shouldn't be on a station that the kids look at often. I also agree that children should be tought to make decitions based on what they know to be true or false. I believe that children of a understanding age, should be aloud to see the bad, within reason of course, in order for them to be able to determine for themselves good ads and bad ads.

I believe advertisements targeting children should not be banned in the United States. Doing so would be unconstitutional due to the Freedom of Press amendment. Advertisements can help children by promoting healthy eating habits while at the same time teaching them that advertisements are just ploys for businesses to get more money.

From two years children cannot know the difference between advertising and actual TV programs . Between 3 to 6 years , they Can identify an advertisement and distinguish it from programming , but they cannot understand that advertising are trying to sell an product . in addition , they think advertisements as being enjoyable or helpful . Between 7 – 12 years they Can understanding that advertising are trying to sell something . Also , they

I think they should be able to put ads on tv about kids toys or other things kids wants or needs. First think about it what if you had a good business going on and you need to get your business things out world-wide. If you owned a business you wouldn’t want to stay in just one spot would you i think that would be boarding. Because if you stayed in one spot then everyone in that spot might buy it and then you won't be able to any business. But with the help of tv ads they can make their product go all around the world.

I do not believe that advertisements directed toward children should be banned. If we banned this for of advertisement, then what would be next? Banning advertisements for young adults? Just like childrens ads, they show celebrities, are easily remembered, and encourage impulse buying. Arguments could be made that young adults lack the ability to make informed decisions like children. Its short minded to think that all advertisements for any age group are all bad or harmfull. I remember watching a childs station when I was younger that ran not only anti-bullying ads, but ads that also encouraged you to go outside and play. At the end of it all, it's the parents job to restrict or limit

Every year billions of dollars are made because of the advertisments you encounter on your day to day lives. Advertisements have helped America's economy for decades. They all may have their pros and cons, but not all ads have negative effects on children.

Protecting children by banning advertisements geared towards them is unnecessary for a number of reasons. Some of those reasons would be teaching kids that it is alright to not always get what you want, working towards getting enough money to get the thing you desire, and they will come to learn that not everything is as good as

I do not think anyone would argue the effectiveness advertising has on children. You can do an experiment all on your own by asking any 5 year old who the Vice President of the United States is. You will more than likely get a wrong answer if they give any answer at all. Now try asking that same child about any character that is associated with any major brand of cereal and I think you will probably be impressed by the knowledge they have on the subject. One would argue that is because they may love the cereal but I think it has more to do with the effectiveness of advertising.

Businesses are creatively successful when designing a persuasive advertisement for increased profitability. The most popular ways of broadcasting a product are through radio, internet, billboards, newspapers, and television being the most effective. Many adults watch TV and they are usually the ones with the paycheck, so commercials are aimed toward them. On the other hand, it takes less than a strategic mind targeting children because they are fascinated by the simplest things. For years businesses have been perfecting commercials. Although marketing has had an impact on some adults, a more efficient route was discovered. That was by publicizing through the vulnerable minds of children.

This can be problematic because the ads children see after shows can shape all sorts of habits into them : “food preferences, norms, tastes, behaviors, and preferred portion sizes are established during childhood and adolescence and are very difficult to change” (Pomeranz). That is to say that the ads that children see after shows can have profound impacts in a child 's life. Watching a repetition of a sugary cereal commercial can influence a child into buying that product when grocery shopping. Children are power holders and can shape the buying habits of a family: “two to fourteen year olds have sway over 500 billion a year in household purchasings (Calvert). Children really do hold power in a family. They can become targets and fall under the influence of advertisers. In return, advertisers can make children want needs that they don 't really need. Therefore, conflict can arise when a child is denied a product by a parent.

Advertisements can be quite difficult for anyone to fully comprehend. As we get older, we generally gather enough information to know whether or not most of the advertisements that we see on a regular basis should be taken seriously or not. That is not to say, however, that we don’t still get trapped in their webs, it just means that we become a little harder to trap. Although most adults understand the purpose of advertisements, children do not have that luxury. For this very same reason, children are becoming progressively more targeted in company’s ad campaigns, even for ads that should not have anything to do with them. In my own life, for example, I can think of numerous instances where advertisements and the media have affected the purchases of others. Since watching the Consuming Kids video, I have been much more aware of the different tactics that advertisement companies use on the general population in order to get them to continue their spending at an unprecedented rate.

How much are ads part of everyday life? The New York Times recorded a study by Yankelovich, a market research firm, and they estimated that people living in a city see up to 5,000 or more advertisements a day. By the same token, children are heavily exposed to advertising, and most of the ads today are directed right at them. Advertising to children is a big part of the market today. Therefore, advertisers should not market to children because it is unethical. It can influence children’s behavior in a negative fashion, and markets can exploit children, and can use the media to reach children at young ages even though they are not able to understand its intent.

Advertisers use television as a medium to target children, especially during Saturday morning cartoons on popular children networks such as Nickelodeon, PBS Kids, Disney Channel, and Cartoon Network. Children can view up to 40,000 commercials annually on television, most advertisements that are

Besides influencing society as a whole, television particularly impacts children and adolescents. It can be a part of a healthy childhood, but too much screen time is not ideal. In “What are TV Ads Selling to Children?” by John J. O’Connor, he explains how “things haven’t changed much in the television business of children’s merchandising” considering that TV still feeds children “pitches for sugary cereals, sweet drinks, fruit-flavored candies and blond, blue-eyed dolls with fabulous hair and the hottest clothing.” For example, on Disney Channel, they showed children drinking sugary, sweet drinks such as Capri Sun. Also, most of the advertisements were primarily based on the newest, most up to date toys from Minecraft, to Frozen, to Spider Man Homecoming. With that being said, when advertisements like that come on TV, children

The data Adams et al (2012) utilised was supplied by an audience research bureau (Attentional) and although it was considered to be the most accurate available, it is widely used by the retail and manufacturing industry so may be subject to reporting bias. Nutritional specific data for the HFSS values of the foods advertised in both 2006 and 2009 was from data collected in 2009, this data could therefore be an underestimation of the HFSS values in 2006. The comparison of data from different time periods throws up the possibility of differing levels of advertising due to seasonality. It is likely during July there are more adverts for ice-lollies when compared with October.