Can Offensive Art Be Good Analysis

The world would be nothing without art. Art is another way of expressing your feelings. In Anna Deavere Smith’s excerpt From Letters to a Young Artist, she argues that to create great art, an artist needs both knowledge and empathy.

The thought of art is more than what you see it is what you feel and what you learn from looking at it. Art can heal the soul and create and new outlook on images we may see every day. Sadly, we may not always see the art in things, pieces, or, humans.

To elaborate, both Collins’ and Rubin’s application of symbolism reflects how censorship can disintegrate into a broader societal naivety. For instance, though the history teacher believes he is protecting his students’ innocence by excluding violence from the lessons, the children never learn the reality of their world’s past. Walking home, the teacher passes “flower beds and white picket fences”, both of which are typically seen in an isolated, sheltered suburban area (18).

In the contemplation of art, or rather the conceptually intangible definition it currently possess, it is imperative to be mindful that “art” has been utilized as a promotional device, ceremonial item, aesthetically purposed article or perhaps none of these or all. It is because of this vague term that Carolyn Dean, in her text, “The Trouble with (The Term) Art”, makes a case for the consequences of applying the term “art” in societies that lacked such a notion which also accounts for the Western-centric lens the field intrinsically utilizes when viewing non-Western art. The claim is deftly supported by the utilization of expert accounts in the subject, alternative perspectives for what is considered the current norm, and self-examining questions,

“At its best, what art does is, it points to who we as humans beings and what we as human beings value. And if Black Lives Matter, they deserve to be in paintings. ” “Kehinde Wiley reimagines old portraits because 'if Black Lives Matter, they deserve to be in paintings'.” Public Radio International,

By definition, art means “something that is created with imagination and skill and that is beautiful or that expresses important ideas or feelings” (Merriam Webster). Art culminates self expression and allows artists to express their feelings regarding any aspect of their lives. Since art is so open-ended, people are able to express their ideas without inhibition. In the movie Pleasantville, Mr. Johnson and Bud used art as a medium to express their feelings regarding the ban on color and music. This expression further caused change as it was a large scale expression of hope and union for the rights of the colored

Art work with freedom to express aesthetic seems always standing in an opposite pole to social constracted rule, such as ethics. Expecially when I walk in a contenpeary art galleary, it is often to hear commons about a work as “new”, “rebellion” or anti-something. In the chapter Guide for the Misbegotten, Tillman write about John Water, a “ reluctant ethicist” summerized by her, felt guilty about “using the Manson murders in a jokey, smart-ass way in [his] earilier films without the slightest feeling for the victims’ families or the brainwashed Manson Killer kids who were also victims in this sad and terrible case.” To have sympathy for victims is like an instinct of human being, to apologize for bring hurt to others are also common sense. However, what would Tillman and other writers write about John Waters if he followed common sense and old fasion, would his work be recommend just by what it is ? If not, then how to explain an art forgery of old painting made by contempoery painter is

Censorship is “anti-creation” and “the censor’s lie actually succeeds in replacing the artist’s truth”. When something is censored, it is then “thought to have deserved censorship”. This shows that artists need to feel liberated to feel safe enough to be creative and not be silenced by people’s criticism. When something is censored it becomes attacked and starts to define the

“It Isn’t pretty…But Is It Art?” is an article written by Diana Mack, an affiliate scholar at the New York-based Institute for American Values. Mack talks about some public disputes that revolved around popular works of literary and art such as the Harry Potter and Picardo Venus, as well as her opinions that center around “the question of what makes a good work of art.” Mack explains that art works carrying “a serious tone of death, hate…and…evil” but not carrying “publicly reflect(ed) community standards of taste, decency, and respect for religious faith” are constantly criticized and sometimes banned. Clearly felt throughout the article through her tone and statements, Mack’s main point is that individuals should not reject or criticize an art work that seem “alien and unappealing.”

Art can be a touchy subject in a sense. It takes a special type of mind to have a perfect understanding of art. It is a subject that some find intemidating. In my opinion, Sarah Dowling is a spectacular artist who gives deep meaning to her work.  While reading her interview with Alyice Edrich, I learned what Sarah Dowlings work was really all about.

When most people think about art, the first thing to come to mind would usually be paintings that are hung up in a museum. Unless you really understand the value of art you may not believe me when I say the value of art is essential to the well being of free individuals. This idea can be supported by Bell Hooks story named “ Art On My Mind”.

Art is entirely subjective, there is no medium that should be censored because, artist should be able to create with no restrictions, America is not a dictatorship, and families should decide what’s appropriate for their homes.

Art is meant to make someone feel something. Artists can convey emotions through their art. However, what happens when the emotion that is conveyed in anger, sadness, or grief. This creates controversy in art. I believe that the painting Myra, by Marcus Harvey creates a feeling of anger and sadness within its viewers that creates controversy. This controversy comes from the events behind this painting but also the way the artist, Marcus Harvey, painted it.

I agree with James Baldwin’s idea because if a person painted, scripture, calligraphy and any artwork, then the art work can be creative by reflecting the society but it does not belong to you.

First, censorship may obstruct the Freedom of Creativity‬ of the artist, which will affect the development of the Art industry. The idea of the artworks is independent to the artist, who