Can Your Environment Increase The Expectence Of Violent Behavior

My operational definition of violence is any kind of physical action where the intention is to hurt, damage or kill someone or something. There is the question of whether violence is a part of human nature or simply some people way of interacting with the world around us, were we always violent or is it a more pronounced feature of the modern era? I believe that violence is a key part of human nature and has contributed to our survival and evolution on many occasions, however it can also a major drawback and has led to some of humanities most devastating mortality rates, wars and atrocities. It is widely accepted that violence is present in at least some humans, and so where does this violence originate from? The nature vs nurture debate explores whether people are born with this violent gene or are raised by their parents or guardians to act in a violent way but are not born with it. The nature vs nurture debate is a key part of violences origins in humanity and so will be explored in this essay.

Violence take multiple forms, many of which are covered in the nightly news. Murder, rape, familial abuse, bullying, workplace hostility, armed robbery—all of these are societal problems with far-reaching repercussions. There have long debates and discussions regarding whether nature or nurture influences individual violent behavior. People are concerned about what makes an individual to engage in violent behavior such murder or burglary among other types of crimes. They are also concerned about what makes people stop such behavior. However, there is no precise conception whether nature, nurture or both influence violence. Some people assume that, violent behavior results from individual’s life experiences or upbringing also known as nurture. Others feel that violent behavior is more complex and results from individual’s genetic character or nature. In other words, it is not clear whether violent behavior is inborn or occurs at some point in persons’ lives, but even it’s hard, emphasizing one and ignoring other influences is always an unwise way to go.

Aggression is a critical concept in understanding social psychology. Many have defined aggression as a type of behavior that is used to purposely harm someone (Arndt, Greenberg, Landau, & Schmader). In a study conducted in 2016 regarding school crime and safety, it was reported by their principals that nearly 5% of the students have been experiencing moderate to severe discipline issues (Musu-Gilette, Zhang, Wang, Zhang, & Oudekerk, 2017). Since this behavior comes in two forms, verbal and physical, it can have an influence on a person’s psyche. The long-term consequences of experiencing and witnessing family violence have been seen to have an effect on how a person communicates and handles situations. Family life is a leading predictor in determining aggressive behavior. The interaction between family members does play a key part in the development of a child. Considering children do learn how to behave and react from their surrounding environment through imitation. Aggressive behavior can be influenced by family relationships that can have a lasting impact on adolescents.

The inquiry whether violent entertainment affects a child's brutal behavior is an argument that has been disputed upon for several years. Most researches performed have concluded that violence in the media does not relate to the acts of a child, unless the child has been exposed to various types of environments. Other research is clearly lacking a direct causal relationship between violent video games and youth violence (MassGeneral,2012). Children's acts of violence are determined by what or with whom they are associated with.

What drives individual human behavior? Personality that’s what. Not one person is the same. We all have a personality that is different from each other. To help with this process we turn to biological theory. Biological Theory of crime seems to focus on the genetic factors; genetic factors tend to influence criminal behavior. When people think of the word biological they tend to think of genetics they think they are one and the same. There are however people who just assume that people are born bad. In fact, biological factors are more inclusive, consisting of physiological, biochemical, neurological, and genetic factors. Genetic factors refer to biological factors that are inherited (Tehrani, Jasmine A & Mednick, Sarnoff

In the time as which my parents grew up the world was very different. They played outside at all hours of the night and they got into more trouble with each other and less with the law. Growing up I had always heard my dad’s stories of wandering around the small town with his friends getting into fights and meeting girls. Somehow now day’s things have changed but remain the same. For instance, we often act like boys fighting at a young age is just stupid or even “childish” but to a boy these fights are often almost something he will need to for the rest of his life it is almost as the fights begin to shape a boy physically and mentally. Fights prepare him for the physical struggles he may later face. If a man

There are some cultures that believe that people are inherently evil. Brought by the early Puritans, this belief flourished in the United States for many years. It wasn’t until the 20th century that Americans began to consider themselves as a combination of good and evil. Many Americans now believe that with constant hard work, control, education, self-discipline and by following certain rules that people can change and improve themselves and achieve goodness (Samovar 195).

Many can say that humans are naturally violent, especially when when they are put in stressful situations. On several occasions we have proven when worst comes to worst we usually end up making the wrong decisions because in some way that seems easier to us . For example we’ve started wars, riots and genocides. Not to say that there aren’t any people who haven’t resorted to violence but generally speaking most humans will participate or at least agree to these violent actions if it can benefit them. Even though they know it’s wrong.

I also do not think that we can shelter our children from violence and negative behaviors they learn from others since many invalidating, and influential factors are part of our world and our reality. In any case, one thing I know without a doubt is that we, as parents (or even as adults), we can be good role models. We can model proper emotional control and anger management. We can teach our children how to express their emotions and sentiments (both positive and negative). We can demonstrate that people can be assertive without being aggressive. We can also model effective problem-solving skills that can help them with their frustration. We can't supervise our children 24/7 because they will see and learn things outside our home, but we can

As there is an increase of violent television shows that children watch there is an increase of aggression in children.

It is unreasonable to say that people are evil at birth; the determining factor of whether or not one is good or bad is their upbringing and obedience. Life situations through childhood and parental guidance can influence ones' character. In Is Human Nature Fundamentally Selfish or Altruistic,

The environment of where a person was raised is another leading cause of crime. When someone grows up in a place where they see all these bad things happening in their society it serves as a role model to them and they adapt other people’s actions. Growing up in a household where somebody does not have parents or a guardian telling them what is right from wrong leads you to do the unthinkable because they do not have any family direction showing you the right way to live life.” One of the most important environmental factors during childhood development is that of socialization or the way a child is ‘taught’ how to act”(Chemistry Web) Lack of faith causes a person to think of violence as their only way to get attention. When someone has no religious values, they think of all the bad things that are bothering them instead of the good that they can bring into their life. Gangs in an environment are a big cause of bringing crime to a society because they are the people who do the most outrageous crimes. They are the ones who are drug dealers, who bring graffiti into neighborhoods, and who commit drive by shootings. Individuals join these gangs to be accepted, to be honored by the people within the gang, and because they may not value themselves

In “Casual effects of violent sports video games on aggression: Is it competitiveness or violent content, Craig A. Anderson, and Nicholas L. Carnagey Believes that aggression comes from the violent video games or only competitive video games. It all started in 2002, when ESPN aired and examined the impact of extremely violent sports games on youth’s attitudes towards sports (ESPN, 2002). When ESPN aired this piece Midway games was producing several sports games that had unrealistic violence far enough to just to appeal the non-sports fan or gamer. In these games that Midway games produced they allowed players to control real-life players on the video game platform, and could perform very extreme violent behaviors. It became so excessive that

Causes of conformity between individuals have long been discussed over the past years and recent times of today’s lives. Many are the times an individual beliefs to be better and unique unlike anyone else. It’s true we all possess specific behaviors that differentiate us from every other person in the universe. However, imaginations, thoughts, and wishful thinking, for most of the people goes hand in hand with certain rules of the society in numerous cases. Some examples of conformity include children attend school and adults go to work; cars will stop at a red light and move once it turns green. If we never complied with any set rules in the society, the whole entire structure would break down. The research examining this piece will fit various model categories to derive five main reasons that motivate conformity.

We live in a modern world conquered by wrong doings. Why, we tend to ask. What encourages individuals to move towards evil doing? Isn’t self-restraint a sufficient obstacle in the pursuit of evil? One of the many questions which strike us when we are surrounded by injustices is whether it is the wrong individuals or the collective society which drives those particular evil doings. In a sociocultural context, this may be a very subjective question due to the lack of universality in the definition of ‘bad’ in itself. Philosophers, and more recently psychologists, have studied intellectual and neurological causes of wrong actions in search for an answer to the concerned question.