Canada's Immigration Policy Research Paper

One of the first major acts towards immigration was the Canadian Citizenships Act of 1947, which was passed by WL Mackenzie King on January 1, 1947 (Towards the Citizenship Act. Government of Canada). This act enabled non- Canadian immigrants to live in Canada regardless of their origin and were also able to apply for citizenship after 5 years of living in Canada (Ibid). Other changes included that women would not lose their citizenship if they married a non- Canadian (Erica, Gagnon. Canadian Citizenship Act, 1947). However, Canadians could lose citizenship if they adopted other citizenships (Ibid). This act was significant as Canada was the first Commonwealth country create separate citizenship, which aided in defining their independent nationhood (Towards the Citizenship Act. Government of Canada). Another pivotal movement was the introduction of the Point System in 1967, which instituted three classes of immigrants: independent class, family class and humanitarian class (A.E, Challoner. Canada's Immigration Policy). These classes categorized immigrants’ potential to be active and beneficial to productivity in Canadian society. This act also empowered for provinces to manage their own immigration laws (Ibid). Furthermore, Canadian independence was critical in

As we all know, Canada is an immigrant country. This beautify country attract more and more people who are longing for good future. In 2011, the population of foreign-born in Canada is about 6.7 million. No matter where we are from and what background we have, from the moment we land in Canada as immigrants, there are some problems we need to face to. The commonest three problems are learning a new language, adjusting to a new life-style, and finding a suitable job.

6th July 2016, New Delhi: Immigration to Canada depends on your skills, qualification, experience, and the way you choose and follow the whole process. Canada is one of the most preferred countries for migration –henceforth the country witnesses millions of people across the globe applying for permanent residency of Canada. Here is an overview on gateways to get Canada PR.

Immigrants today now have the privilege of entering and residing in Canada but along with this privilege, there are also barriers that impede their integration and deprive them of equal opportunity in the society. The undervaluing of foreign education and credentials has emerged over the years as a huge obstacle faced by recent immigrants who seek employment in the areas that they have been trained, and worked in for decades in their respective home countries. For years, newcomers in Canada have been denied inclusion into the Canadian labour market simply because of policies that were

The immigrant act was established in the parlimement of Canada in 1976, the main focus was not to discriminate who should not be allowed into Canada act, however it gave power to individual provinces, so they set out their own immigration rules and regulations called “forbidden classes” to continue forbidden classes refers to people who may be seen as a burden to the general society, also only independent immigrants were asked to take part in the points system. The levels of government involved were provincial and federal the responsibility’s are divided between the two levels of governments, the federal government has exclusive jurisdiction over deciding how many immigrants are accepted into Canada and the provincial governments job is is

On June 28, 2012, the Protecting Canada’s Immigration System Act (Bill C-31) took effect. This act was put in place to bring further reforms to the asylum system, add measures to address human smuggling, and add the requirement to include biometric data as part of a temporary resident visa, work permit, and study permit application. These changes were claimed to help the system to function better, cut down wait time, make the process faster, screen applicants better, and to prevent needless complications. This resulted in many changes to Canada’s asylum system.

The period of 1914 to 1939, Canada’s immigration policy got very unfair. Changes were made to the Immigration Act in 1914 that allowed the rejection of anyone from any race that was deemed

To further add to the strengths of Canadian immigration policy, Canadian views on immigration are supported by a qualitative support, rather than misconceived narrative of immigrants. To elaborate, the media has created a narrative where certain races of immigrants are more prone to committing crimes through the over-reporting of immigrant crimes and incidents (Rossiter & Rossiter, 2009, p.2). This then creates a false impression of them that is reflected in the immigration policy, which then further fuels the discrimination. Statistically speaking, this impression is false as immigrants do not commit crimes at a greater rate than native population (Rossiter & Rossiter, 2009, p.5). In fact, according to empirical research, immigrants who have

Throughout many years, people from various countries throughout the world have immigrated to other countries for their own life necessities. Some countries provide a minimize of the things people need, so they come to the conclusion that finding another home with better options might be better for their lives. The United States having the most immigrants with 44 million, and Ukraine having the most emigrants with 6.6 million for different reasons. Many people go through tough phases during their existence in their own countries, wanting to live a better life with, and for their family members. The number of immigrants that come to Canada in a year is 250 000. But why is it that people immigrant to Canada? Canada provides 3 major

This focus of this article is on the liberalisation of immigration policies in Canada and the US post WWII. Triadafilopoulos (2010, 169) makes an argument that liberalisation of immigration policies were driven by “shifting norms” in concern to race, ethnicity, and human rights. Canada’s commitment as part of its membership to the UN entailed an “unqualified obligation” in eradicating racial discrimination and promoting human rights but this conflicted with its domestic practice (Triadafilopoulas, 2010, 178). Canada’s vision was to preserve its white-European ‘composition,’ which meant discouraging those who do not fit in this vision (Triadafilopolous, 2010, 178). Critics used the shift in normative context to challenge discriminatory policies.

There are various issues that revolve around Canadian politics. These issues can include various subjects, such as economics, multiculturalism, health care, immigration, and foreign policy. An important issue in Canada that is discussed in this essay is Canada’s constant changes to its immigration policy in order to improve its economic goals and the labour market. These issues are changing by different policies that the Canadian government are putting into place, which creates a more strict system in choosing who can immigrate into the country. Three articles that thoroughly analyze Canada’s immigration policy in order to implement these changes are the following. The first article is named: “New Directions in Immigration Policy: Canada’s

Since 1867, Canada has had laws and regulations governing the admission of immigrants. Immigration legislation has evolved and changed over and over, which shaped by the shifting social, political and economic climate, as well as dominant beliefs about race, desirability and integration. In this essay I will discuss about how effective of both policy “head tax” and Japanese Interment”. Though the “Head tax” the Canadian government make the money and the Canadian government have no intention to keep the Chinese worker from immigration in which result in the discrimination problem. Second I will talk about Japanese internment, how the Canadian government forced relocation subjected Japanese Canadians to government enforced curfews and interrogations. Moreover, their jobs and property were removed and they were sent to internment camps. The “Japanese Interment” and “Head tax “were very effective. it totally change their lives which make them harder to live and not getting the respect.The Canadian government does not allow both Chinese Canadian or Japanese to work for high wage jobs and living without the family. It seems like all the actions are set to protect the country Canada but it some how against the human right the discrimination problem again not only the Chinese but also Japanese.

During the early 20th century, Asian immigrants who came to Canada faced a great deal of backlash from Canadian society. Among these men and women who came overseas, the Chinese suffered the brunt of the racial discrimination that ran rampant in Canada, and were treated distinguishably worse than any other group of immigrants. Although many other immigrants were met with prejudice and racial stereotyping on arrival, there was no other group that experienced the same level of organized racism as Chinese immigrants did. Discriminatory acts were not only conducted on a communal and societal level, but also found its way into Canadian politics. What resulted from this was a national effort to limit the Chinese from both entering Canada as well

Canada’s roll in accepting immigrants and refugees ultimately changed the make-up of Canadian society. Canada, slowly becoming a cultural mosaic, changed immigration policies to improve the life for both immigrants and refugees. This nation, was immensely important in the aspect of immigration through the 1970s to the 1990s. Canada’s acceptance of immigrants and refugees not only boosted the economy but showed that Canada was a kind, caring, and compassionate country, and with that came cultural diversity.

The purpose of this paper is to provide an analysis of the immigration experience of “Calvin” who came to Canada from Hong Kong in 1997 in order to avoid the negative repressions of the transition from British to Chinese rule. Sociologists that have been read for this class claim or found that about international migration is a combination of micro and macro as well as push and pull factors. For this paper, the neoclassical model, as discussed by Massey et al, will be discussed as it focuses more on the individual cost-benefit analysis that compelled Calvin 's family to come to Canada than