Candidate Hamm Summary

Candidate Perras delivered the five paragraph order in the correct order and covered all details; however, he did tend to take long pauses that did not allow for the order to flow. During the execution phase, SNC lost sight of the tactical mindset by allowing a member to pass off his weapon. Even though the fire team remained focused on accomplishing the mission, at times they seemed lathargic. SNC maintained solid communication with the security. Upon realizing that his initial plan of attack was not going to work, he quickly devised a new plan without hesitation. He was able to use all of the fire team members effectively and they followed his lead without hesitation or conflict. SNC remained calm and confident and there was no question

Candidate McKillop was able to brief a five paragraph order that included most sub-paragraphs, except for an initial scheme of maneuver. During the delivery, SNC sounded nervous and often used filler words. His inability to brief confidently and lacking a scheme of maneuver caused him to have a delayed execution since he had to brief all of the mission details again. During the execution, SNC was able to take charge and display more confidence than he had displayed in the brief. SNC employed his fire team members appropriately based on their physical capabilities to tackle specific tasks and sent the lighter ones through the planks first. Candidate McKillop struggled the most with being able to make adjustments to his initial plan. Although

Candidate Blackmon successfully plotted the current location of the objective. SNC’s five paragraph order was delivered confidently, however he did not properly state the friendly situation. SNC stated that friendly units were northwest of the current location instead of friendly units being one mile north then west along Guadalcanal. Without this information SNC’s brief was inaccurate. Though SNC was confident during his brief, he did not have the attention of his squad as members who were focusing in different directions staring into the trees or cleaning their nails. The squad's lack of attention was ignored by the squad leader. After engaging the enemy SNC was informed that he sustained casualties and the bridge was covered by enemy fire

Candidate Passafume's brief was confident and clear. His order included a complete enemy situation utilizing the SALUTE acronym. SNC had an initial plan. His initial plan did not include key elements to drive the mission such as how to enter into the sewage system. Prior to execution, SNC spent an elongated period to explain each miniscule task. As a result, his fire team stood around, not progressing towards mission accomplishment, and waiting to execute. During points of friction and throughout the evolution SNC was not a clear leader. SNC routinely failed to provide guidance and necessary and make decisions. SNC seemed overwhelmed and repeatedly failed to make a decision. Candidate Passafume did not always give orders to his fire

Candidate Otoole confidently briefed her five paragraph order to her fire team, but failed to brief the “why” portion of her mission statement. She identified the urgency of time, and decided to utilize the column formation to move quickly to the objective. SNC then briefed upon contact, the fire team would move into a skirmisher to appropriately attack through the enemy. Through the movement to the objective, Candidate Otoole controlled her fire team by maintaining eye contact with each member and consistently passing the formation of the fire team. Candidate Otool attacked through the objective and conducted an incomplete inspection of the cache site; she did not thoroughly look through the ammo can. SNC had a clear understanding of

Candidate Barrowcliff's tactical mindset and seriousness about the problem was evident when he posted security before he started his order. SNC's order was relayed with a great level of confidence. SNC covered all the details while having a complete understanding of the mission. At the end of his brief, he pointed to a candidate and asked him to restate the mission to check for understanding, ensuring there wouldn't be any confusion. Candidate Barrowcliff formulated an initial plan and completely briefed his fire team. SNC displayed a sense of urgency and desire to move toward mission accomplishment. SNC's adjustments to his plans were decisive and effective. Candidate Barrowcliff was clearly in charge and demonstrated calm demeanor in a

Candidate Fowler successfully calculated the azimuth, however failed to calculate the distance and plot the location of the objective. SNC’s five paragraph order was delivered confidently, however lacking information. SNC failed to properly brief the enemy situation, regarding the location of the enemy. SNC stated that the enemy was seen in the area, however he failed to mention they were seen west of the area which is in the vicinity of the objective. SNC was provided with the accurate information regarding azimuth and distance; however when briefing his squad he still provided an inaccurate distance. Upon enemy engagement SNC properly assessed threat by engaging with buddy rushes. SNC did not ensure area was clear before bringing the casualties

Candidate Biondo briefed all five paragraphs of the order but it was lacking detail. He did not brief scheme of maneuver in the order and he did brief not a plan. Also, he would say "I say again" prior to even stating the mission statement once, which displayed that he was not confident in his order. SNC was able to come up with a plan on the fly prior to executing. When his plan was clearly not working he adjusted the plan about five minutes into the executions. SNC was able to act in a timely manner. SNC positioned himself in the best position to control his fire team. SNC addressed security and he had one fire team member establishing security throughout the mission. After making some quick decisions initially, SNC appeared to get

Enemy combatants, in familiar terrain, chose to stand and fight from fortified positions; forcing commanders to improvise and adapt quickly to unforeseen circumstances. Support elements received the operational order within just one week of the expected execution date. Staff elements created analysis and plans on poor intelligence estimates and recent experience. Strategic planners also failed to establish command and control of the assault force. Lack of forethought for an integrated joint operation, although ultimately successful, led to the death of U.S. service members. Joint planning for Operation Anaconda, with its complex variables requiring integrated skills, failed to account for enemy variables, withheld information from support elements, and failed to establish effective command and control.

Upon issue of his order to his fire team, it was immediately apparent that Candidate Woodgie took time to think about and develop a clear initial plan. SNC briefed a scheme of maneuver that both outlined his plan to negotiate the obstacles from start to finish and included anonymous, sequential, and thorough tasking statements that painted a very clear picture for his team what needed to be done. This was followed by both specific tasking statements but also the assignment of specific roles in the fire team. SNC also briefed very specific coordinating instructions as tactical control measures indicating an keen understanding of the five paragraph order format. More importantly, those clear instructions further amplified the plan for his

SNC’s five paragraph order was delivered meek tone which lacked authority and command presence; SNC appeared aloof and distant throughout the brief. SNC’s Situation paragraph included fabricated information contrary to what the evaluator briefed; these omissions caused the squad to not understand the mission. SNC briefed specific, relevant tasks but failed to brief any coordinating instructions beyond “attack begins immediately after this order.” SNC briefed Admin and Logistics as “unchanged since the last order.” SNC’s brief was punctuated with filler words. SNC departed towards the objective without the ammo cans required to complete the mission. During movement to the objective, dispersion was poor; at most times 5 candidates were

Candidate Kidd delivered a complete and sequential five paragraph order. Throughout his entire brief, SNC had several pauses due to obvious signs of nervousness and dependency on his OSMEAC template. Nonetheless, his order contained sufficient information for his fire team to execute the mission. During the execution phase, SNC moved his fire team with a sense of urgency as instructed by the order. He was knowledgeable to place them in a column formation for maximum speed. When SNC received unexpected enemy contact, and subsequently received a casualty, he quickly reacted by returning fire and aiding proper aid to the casualty. SNC responded well and in a calm matter during the chaotic situation. Once reaching the objective, SNC was conscious

Cadidate Gibbs delivered his five paragraph order lacking information. SNC did not have a clear understanding of the information that was briefed to him. During his brief SNC failed to fully explain the Orientation, Friendly Situation, and Mission. SNC appeared to not understand the structure of the five paragraph order. SNC lacked confidence, which was evident through his timid voice and lack of command presence, SNC was allotted plenty of time prior to the beginning of his brief time for questions. SNC stated that he had none. While briefing, SNC stopped to ask the evaluator questions pertaining to the Coordinating Instructions. SNC did not establish a plan prior to execution. SNC displayed a great amount of nervousness, as he barely covered

SNC was confident while presenting the brief. He did not provide the purpose during the Orientation, the Enemy statement was simply a repeat of what was given by the evaluator, and there was no “in order to” for the Mission. The SOM briefed was too vague with no executable instructions provided, and SNC failed to provide any Tasks. During the execution, SNC placed himself in an appropriate location where his FT could hear him and he would be able to assist as necessary; however, he was timid with little confidence or command presence. Instead of ordering his FT members to complete tasks he asked them if they were comfortable doing those things. Because of this, SNC did employ his FT members well and when they were able to successfully complete a task SNC was unsure how to continue on. This indicated that SNC was

Candidate Mantecon briefed all paragraphs of OSMEAC. However, he stumbled through the brief at times and momentarily lost his bearing by laughing when he reached a moment of difficulty. After the brief, SNC began to task his subordinates, which should have been done during OSMEAC. Instead of coming up with an initial plan SNC made statements such as, "it's not the far we shouldn't lose our bearing" and "let's stay disciplined." SNC lacked key elements required to complete the mission. During the execution phase, SNC was able to control his fire team. For example, SNC adjusted dispersion and adjusted speed. Upon enemy contact, SNC was able to make adjustments. SNC took into account the changing environment and quickly adjusted the