Candidate Wessner Case Summary

0715 hours CSW arrived at the above residence and met with Hillsboro PD Officer Parchim, Officer Miller, Officer Curtis and other Hillsboro PD personnel.

Summer Wilks, who was 88-years of age, died a horrifying death in 2012 as her left lung gradually filled with liquid that should have been streaming into her stomach. Over the time of 12 hours, while Ms. Wilks was cognizant and limited in her bed, her lung was being filled with liquid, which caused her to gradually drown. The patient was given a feeding tube since she experienced dementia and had no gag reflex or capacity to swallow sustenance. Ms. Wilks had been transported from a nursing home to Phoebe Memorial Hospital for successive blacking out scenes. Once in the hospital she was given a feeding tube, which she pulled out. In the wake of restraining her, doctors re-supplanted the feeding tube and checked with a x-ray that it had been improperly set, so a third tube was embedded into what the doctor believed was Ms. Wilks stomach. The placement was checked once again utilizing an x-ray, which was misread by the specialist. As opposed to being inserted into her stomach, the

Julie Fisher was employed as a surgical nurse at San Pedro Peninsula Hospital(SPPH) along with her husband Cordell Fisher, who was a pediatric dental surgeon. The defendants SPPH, DR. Tischler and DR. Brow. Dr. Tischler is a member of SPPH's medical staff specializing in gynecology and obstetrics. Dr. Tischler controlled Ms. Fisher's employment by giving her direct orders and making recommendations about her performance. Dr. Brow is a member of SPPH's medical staff specializing in pediatrics. From 1981 until November 1982,

Neser aptly observes that the persuasive value of Griffin’s testimony regarding the intent of the HCGPP is discounted by the fact Griffin articulated his statements regarding the section’s intent after this question into the nuances of this provision arose. Indeed, the persuasive value of Griffin’s testimony is discounted to the extent that it might constitute an ad hoc iteration of the agency’s subsequently articulated intent. Griffin’s testimony regarding the intent of this provision is nevertheless consistent with the subsequent amendment made to adopt the Board’s interpretation of the statute. “While amendments are not controlling as to the meaning of prior iteration of the same statutory scheme, ‘nevertheless, subsequent legislation

1 The service I will be choosing the ticket sales of the Ohio State football team over the past twenty years. The price of this service has fluctuated over the past years. There are many reasons why these ticket prices have changed such as the scandal in the 2010 season, the National Championship in 2014 with Ezekiel Elliot and the rest of the Buckeyes, or the stadium renovations in the early 2000’s.

Mr. Womack shared that he is working with ex-felons who are unable to obtain employment and/or housing and would like to see this situation improved.

Paul Branzburg was a reporter for The Courier-Journal, Louisville, and worked on the article about young people synthesizing hashish from marihuana, which brought them about $5,000 in three weeks. He investigated the issued of drug use in Louisville and wrote two articles about it. The first article contained a picture of unknown hands holding hashish, and the second was written based on the interviews with drug users. Both of the sources requested not to be identified. After a few month of the publication, Branzburg was issued a subpoena by a grand jury about illegal actions they were witnessing, because the articles caught the attention of the local law-enforcement personnel. He was requested to name his sourced. He refused to testify, based

Candidate Hairston was confident and thorough when briefing his order. Although confident and thorough while briefing, Candidate Hairston failed to ask fire team members if they had any questions at the end of his brief. This caused a little confusion, leaving fire team members with unanswered questions. Prior to the execution phase SNC posted security and ensured security was able to hear everything in the event he had to replace a fire team member. During the start execution phase, SNC did not utilize the gear provided and attempted to use his fire team members as a means to traverse the obstacle. For more than two and a half minutes, fire team members were standing around waiting for direction, not progressing towards mission accomplishment,

Candidate Sharp demonstrated a basic understanding of the five paragraph order, but did not clearly articulate his words, paused intermittently, and rushed through parts of his brief. SNC failed to develop an executable plan and did not brief any tasking statements to his team. SNC also ended the brief and then went back to finish it after he had already begun executing the mission. After a suggestion from another candidate, SNC delegated security to a team member. Another team member would continually ignore SNC while executing the obstacle. However, SNC lacked the command presence and communication skills to correct the candidate or recognize the need to replace him at a key location. SNC had difficulty leading multiple candidates and failed

Candidate Pennington delivered a strong order that addressed all necessary pieces of the five paragraph order. He provided a unique orientation to the obstacle on the terrain by physically showing his fireteam the parts that were contaminated. This greatly helped the fireteam's situational awareness to the problem. It allowed him to utilize mission type orders and stay in a position to supervise the overall execution rather than focus on unnecessary details. He communicated well with his team and gave and received suggestions while remaining in obvious control of the team. Candidate Pennigton broke down his security early and gave it minimal thought following the delivery of his order. He utilized strong concurrent actions by using each avenue

Candidate Lofswold’s initial brief was succinct and covered the entirety of the five paragraph order and contained detailed information. Candidate Lofswold assigned ready, fire, and assist to his fire team, but did not establish an initial plan or specific tasks for the plan. Upon starting the evolution, Candidate Lofswold emphasized teamwork and communication, but because of the lack of planning, he encountered a point of friction requiring a rapid decision, which caused a loss of momentum. Candidate Lofswold briefly stepped out the situation to assess and supervise, causing another candidate to step in and provide directions to the rest of the fire team. Candidate Lofswold’s security detail was completely unaware of his surroundings and no

Candidate Briggs struggled delivering his order as he was unable to clearly read his notes and stumbled through nearly every section. The general lack of confidence or plan coming out of his order left his fire team at a loss initially with how they were to accomplish the mission. He posted security but then failed to check on them for the remainder of the time. Once they began executing, SNC was able to provide direction for tasks to accomplish and started making some progress. When he encountered friction, both from a fire team member unable to lift a pole alone and another unable to successfully throw a rope across the obstacle, he directed them to just stop trying instead of attempting to overcome the problem. Candidate Briggs was

Candidate McGinnis posted security prior to issuing her order, this displayed having situation awareness of the enemy. SNC demonstrated an understanding on how to brief a five paragraph order, however she did omit the administration/logistics and command/signal paragraphs from her order. The execution paragraph outlined a vague scheme of maneuver with tasking statements that gave an idea of what needed to be done to accomplish the mission. Once they began the execution SNC took an excessive amount of time to look over the problem, causing the team to lose focus. Upon the first friction point SNC was hesitant to alter her initial plan. After several failed attempts SNC continued to stick with her initial plan which slowed down the momentum

Candidate Wallace successfully briefed the entire five-paragraph order, though she added an additional element, referring to the environment as urban terrain, and neglected to brief the location of the friendly platoon. Candidate Wallace also briefed that communication would be arm signals only, but utilized only verbal signals on the obstacle. Once on the obstacle, Candidate Wallace came up with a good plan, which was unfortunately poorly executed. In the conduct of her plan, Candidate Wallace also removed the fire team's security, bringing in that candidate to assist, and did not replace security for two minutes. Additionally, Candidate Wallace had a candidate who was doing well throwing the rope over the top bar, but replaced her with

Candidate Shuma delivered most of the elements of a five paragraph. He failed to brief the admin and logistics, command and signal paragraph, and did not brief an initial scheme of maneuver. As a result, he had to take some time during the execution to brief a plan to his fire team which delayed the start of the problem. During the execution, he failed to understand the mission and erroneously focused all his efforts in getting the ammo can across the bridge without him or his fire team also getting across. When a member of his fire team asked him if they needed to get over the obstacle too, SNC incorrectly said ‘no’ that it was only the ammo can and that they would be unable to cross due to there being a mine field. The fire team member pointed