Canlii Week 2 Case Study

The Plaintiff’s estate was sequestrated in Federal Magistrates Court on May 12 2009, for failure to pay Council court costs [10]. An application by the Plaintiff for an extension in time to appeal this sequestration was

The district court granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment on the plaintiff’s Americans with Disability Act claim. The plaintiff’s is not estopped by her SSDI and long term disability claims.The court foreclosed to grant the plaintiff new trial. The appellate court the district court’s ruling.

Analyze Luxford & Anor v Sidhu & 3 others [2007] NSWSC 1356 (3 December 2007) as follows:

Your managing partner has handed you the Supreme Court of Queenslands’ decision in The Public Trustee of Queensland and Anor v Meyer and Ors [2010] QSC 291 and asked you to answer the following questions. You should assume you are answering questions for someone who has not read the case, so be sure to provide sufficient detail in your answers. You do not need to provide reference details for Part A of the assignment.

First off, I was extremely surprised about how many landlord-tenant cases take place. However for a majority of the cases, the defendant failed to appear in court resulting in numerous default judgments. For instance, the plaintiff: Stadium Drive Apartments made three attempts to deliver notices, one being a personal delivery attempt, and the defendant Joyce Russell failed to appear in court. The result, a default judgment, fines of $1149 and $139.74 totaling to 1288.74. There was another instance where a defendant Ramsey had 2 months of unpaid rent, which were grounds for eviction. The landlord began the eviction process, serving multiple nonpayment of rent notices, and later a Demand for Possessions for Nonpayment of rent. These lawful eviction procedures require completion prior to going to court, therefore the plaintiff did everything they were entitled to. Subsequently, in court the plaintiff filed for termination of residency. The defendant astoundingly did not appear in court, and yet another default judgment was made. The judge ordered either a sheriff or a court

The summary of the judgment claims it had improperly granted the respect for the plaintiff claims for the paper restriction inside his cell and with having his First Amendment rights violated. After the disciplinary proceeding, the subject of the plaintiff had deprived his protected of aspects of the district court dismissing his disciplinary proceedings. As for the plaintiff’s he received for merit for his claim of having his rights being violated in the California Department of Corrections. His case wasn't continued based on the judges ruling because there wasn't any evidence for him to provide that his rights were violated. I think this is a tough ruling because it's like a man vs the jailhouse which he has no other witnesses while the jailhouse officers could be witnesses for the guards that went into the cell to take down all the paper off the plaintiff's wall. While he claims that his first amendment rights were violated, the retaliation for the plaintiff is that”the Eighth Amendment requires only that prison officials not be"deliberately indifferent" to the safety of their inmates.”Overall this plaintiff had a couple of other cases that he took to court which he stated in most of them that his constitutional rights were violated in all of his

Plaintiff 2 is Joletta Watson, friend and roommate of Elizabeth Stroot and a tenant of Haverford apartments from 1990 to 1994.

The letter informed Complainant that his rent was being readjusted to $100 per month effective November 2017. Respondents state that they did not receive this letter until around mid-December 2017. Subsequently, Respondents adjusted Complainant’s rent to reflect new monthly charge of $100. However, Respondents assert since November 2017, Complainant has failed to make any rent payment of $100 even after the rent adjustment. Respondents maintain that Complainant’s failure to make his November rent payment which led to the issuing of the eviction notice. Respondents maintain that Complainant’s source of income had absolutely nothing to do with the decision to issue the eviction

Staffing completed on 4/27/17 with CAN worker (Ericka Womack), Case Worker (Kenesha Grant, and Ondria Moore. According to the CAN worker, DHR got involved because of domestic violence between Philip Miller and Lena Miller (current wife /step mother of the children) while the children were visiting their home. Mr. Miller was arrested. After released Miller is reported enrolling in AA class. Mr. Miller works on the red stone arsenal with security clearance. According to the Can worker, the biological mother of the children, Melissa Carson (ex-wife) has full custody of the 3 children (Judah, Jianna”Lilly Miller and Penelope Miller) along with protection abuse order (PFA) against Mr. Miller. Mr. Miller is reported having a gun under his bed and

In this case, the Department credibly testified to mailing the Appellant a Notice. Although the Appellant stated that she did not receive the Notice, she provided no evidence to show that that it was caused by the Department. Furthermore she testified to her mail carrier placing her mail in the mail receptacles of other tenants as well as other unassigned places. The ALJ finds that errors made by the Postal Service, are not caused by the Department, and therefore finds that the Department had no fault in the non-receipt of the Appellant’s

- This issue was last tried on May 27, 2011, in the Supreme Court of Canada

The appellant in this case is Mavis Baker. She is Jamaican citizen and came to Canada in August of 1981. She came to Canada as a visitor and didn’t go back to her own country and she was working in Canada illegally as a live in caregiver. She didn’t get Permanent Residence here .Mavis Baker has four Canadian Children .When her Younger child was born in 1992 after she get suffered problem of the post-partum psychosis and was diagnosed with paranoid schizophrenia. Because of her illness, she applied for welfare.

JASPER COUNTY, Ind. (WLFI) — According to Indiana State Police, a driver of a passenger car spilled a drink on herself causing her to sideswipe a Griffith School Corporation bus causing it to roll over.

Before delving into the recommendations, it is important to get a brief background and understanding of the current situation regarding PMI and police officers in Canada. In some situations, police officers are given only mere seconds to react to a perceived threat. Unfortunately, police officers sometimes have no other options, or no other training, than to use lethal force (3). This is also because there is legislation in the Criminal Code of Canada which permits lethal force (sections 25-30), specifically section 25(1) which states that “everyone who is required or authorized by law to do anything in the administration or enforcement of the law (b) as a peace officer or public safety officer” (4). Section 5 of the Police Services Act: Regulations

Chobani is a greatly successful company based in New York, where their Founder Hamdi Ulukaya moved to when he came to the states from Turkey (Chobani History 2016). Chobani is a company known for having the best Greek yogurt in the United States. Chobani prides themselves on having a high quality yogurt that is incomparable with any other brand of yogurt out on the market. This dedication the quality is what sets Chobani above everybody else is directly causing their positive business growth. By the end of 2015 Chobani’s revenue was at “$1.5 billion where their competitors were at $250 million” (Giammona 2015). What differentiates Chobani between its competitors is its dedication to the quality and the fact that the Chobani Greek yogurt is healthier than that of Dannon and in any other competitors brings as they use all natural ingredients on where others may have antibiotics and other unhealthy byproducts in their yogurt which can be poorer for health of the consumer. With Chobani’s small staff of 2000 employees and their solo headquarters and different type of product manufacturing, Chobani makes a huge difference in less mechanical and robotic form of creating the yogurt that those of the competitor’s process to creating quality within the product. Companies such as Coca-Cola or Pepsi Co would want to buy a Chobani there has been no offers them product differentiation such as the purchases the Coca-Cola has made with Vitaminwater (Martin, Sorkin