Capital Budgeting And Its Effects On A Business

This mini-case provides a review of the methodology and rationale associated with the various capital budgeting evaluation methods such as payback period, discounted payback period, NPV, IRR, MIRR,

NPV is known as the best technique in the capital budgeting decisions. There were flows in payback as well as discounted pay back periods because it don’t consider the cash flow after the payback and discounted pay back period. To remove this flows net present value (NPV) method, which relies on discounted cash flow (DCF) techniques is used to find the value of the project by considering the cash flow of the project till its life. To implement this approach, we proceed as

Target Corporation was founded in 1902 as Dayton Dry Goods Company, headquartered in Minnesota. In 1962, the first target store was initiated with the purpose of catering customers with discounted values. In United States and Canada, there are currently 1888 stores, in addition to this, in 2004, all of the subsidiaries were sold by the company following the objective of focusing on select stores of Target Corporation. Currently, it is second largest and renowned discount retailer throughout the world. In contrast to this, the company has been facing fierce and strong competition from market leaders such as Wal-Mart and Costco. There is also a need that the company must adjust its capital budgeting process.

When making capital budgeting decisions, there are various techniques that can be utilised. Ross et al. (2008) describes that the predominant capital budgeting methods used as being the Net Present value (NPV) method, the Internal Rate of Return (IRR) method, the Payback method, and the Accounting Rate of Return (ARR) method. Conversely, Brealey, Myers and Allen (2011) proposes that the NPV and IRR methods are considered prestige compared to the ARR and the Payback Methods, as they take into account the time value of money. Thus, the following project evaluation will focus on using the NPV and IRR methods.

The Investment Appraisal are techniques used in an organisation’s overall strategy and decision of capital investment. In general capital investment appraisal are used for ranking projects. A firm can usually have many projects that are appraised at the same time and those techniques will compare the projects and once completed will determine the highest one and this will be implemented. The investment appraisal considered are: ARR, PAYBACK, NPV AND IRR.

The use of an accounting rate of return also underscores a project 's true future profitability because returns are calculated from accounting statements that list items at book or historical values and are, thus, backward-looking. According to the ARR, cash flows are positive due to the way the return has been tabulated with regard to returns on funds employed. The Payback Period technique also reflects that the project is positive and that initial expenses will be retrieved in approximately 7 years. However, the Payback method treats all cash flows as if they are received in the same period, i.e. cash flows in period 2 are treated the same as cash flows received in period 8. Clearly, it ignores the time value of money and is not the best method employed. Conversely, the IRR and NPV methods reflect that The Super Project is unattractive. IRR calculated is less then the 10% cost of capital (tax tabulated was 48%). NPV calculations were also negative. We accept the NPV method as the optimal capital budgeting technique and use its outcome to provide the overall evidence for our final decision on The Super Project. In this case IRR provided the same rejection result; therefore, it too proved its usefulness. Despite that, IRR is not the most favorable method because it can provide false results in the case where multiple negative

In fully investigating all of our calculations we are fully invested in using the Net Present Value figures we calculated as a means of ranking the eight projects. In doing so we found reasons in which why the Net Present Value was our benchmark for ranking the projects and why we did not use the Payback Method. The Payback Method ignores the time value of money, requires and arbitrary cutoff point, ignores cash flows beyond the cutoff date, and is biased against long-term projects, such as research and development and new projects. When comparing the Average Accounting Return Method to the Net Present Value method we found that the Average Accounting Return Method is a worse option than using the Payback Method. The Average Accounting Return Method is not a true rate of return and the time value of money is ignored, it uses an arbitrary benchmark cutoff rate, and is based on accounting net income and book values, not cash flows and market values. Plain and simply put, the Net Present Value method is the best criterion to use when ranking these eight

There are several traditional methods that can be used in appraising investment decisions. For instance, the net present value method (NPV) which entails estimating the costs and revenues of a project and discounting these figures to get their present values. Projects with the biggest positive net present value are the ones chosen as they represent the best stream of benefits of investing in the project over and above recovering the cost of initiating the projects. The discount rate is another method which is similar to the net present value method but reflects more on the time preference. This approach may focus on the opportunity cost of

evaluate a certain kind of project irrespective its nature and level of complexity. Once the

It is identified that internal rate of return is relatively a rate at which the value of net present value tends to be zero. The internal rate of return is an appraisal that is mainly associated with a hurdle cost of either capital or discount rate against which it is compared. The hurdle cost mainly corresponds to the advantage cost of capital. In reference to public projects, the hurdle rate represents to be TDR. The major advantage behind making use of this financial appraisal system is the aspect that internal rate of return is mainly dependent on the percentage of rate of return as well as cash flow in order to effectively access a specific investment with the identification of the time value of money over the life of proposed project and it significantly analysis the risks as well as constraints that are associated with the implication of the project (Götze, Northcott, & Schuster, 2007). In the similar way, when discount rate represents to be anonymous, it is not substantial to make use of internal rate of return in determining whether or not to implement the project, even it is a fact that for IRR estimation which is observed as merit. Along with benefits there are number of disadvantages as well that are linked with IRR appraisal technique. It is not highly suitable for the purpose of ranking of different competitive projects. It is relatively possible that internal rate of return of two competing projects are similar but referred to have distinguishing values of NPV due to distinction in the timing of costs as well as advantages (Haka,

The internal rate of return (IRR) and the net present value (NPV) techniques are 2 investment decision tools that satisfy the 2 major criteria for the correct evaluation of capital projects. This criterion is that the techniques should incorporate the use of cash flows and the use of the time value of money. This makes them viable techniques for evaluating investment proposals.

Once the appropriate information has been collected and analysed, different forms of investment appraisal can be conducted. Here the client will be able to assess the viability of the investment proposal. There a number of different methods that can be used to do this. They include the; internal rate of return, net present value and payback period of the proposal (Horngren et al, 2012). These methods will assist the client in deciding if they should accept or reject the project.

The five investment appraisal techniques used for this report are the Accounting Rate of Return (ARR), payback period, Net Present Value (NPV), discounted payback and Internal Rate of Return (IRR). The results of the five investment appraisal techniques may not be similar because of differences in their approaches and calculations. However, it is advantageous to use more than one investment appraisal technique and understand the importance and problems of each method before making a final decision.

The following paper analyzes a project from financial perspectives using the capital budgeting techniques like Net Present Value (NPV) and Internal Rate of Return (IRR).

Project appraisal techniques are used to evaluate possible investment opportunities and to determine which of these opportunities will generate the best return to the firm’s shareholders. Therefore, it is vital for the firm if they wish to continue receiving funds from shareholders to employ the best techniques available when analysing which investment opportunities will give the best return. There are two types of project appraisal techniques: non-discounted cash flows and discounted cash flows. The Net Present Value and internal rate of return, examples of discounted cash flows, are in use in many large corporations and regarded as more effective than the traditional techniques of payback and accounting rate of return. In this paper, I