Understanding Capital Punishment
Quamere Rooks
Saint Leo University
Abstract
Capital punishment, or the death penalty, has existed in many societies for as long as one can remember. This form of discipline is enforced on those individuals who display the most unfathomable criminal behavior against other fellow beings. In recent years, there has been great controversy over the necessity of methods such as this, and whether this form of inhumane discipline is justified. Some would agree that it is the correct way to punish severe acts of crime. Others would argue that murder is a crime, not a punishment, regardless of the act being committed by the justice system or the regular civilian. In this paper, I will be addressing some of the issues surrounding capital punishment. There will be a brief description of what capital punishment is and its origin. I will also be observing the effects that this disciplinary method has on the deterrence of crime, to distinguish the success of this method compared with those less severe. I conclude that the death penalty is not humane, nor necessary, to inflict on any individual, considering the risks.
Understanding Capital Punishment
Capital Punishment has existed as far back as the Ancient Laws of China, but the first documented execution carried out in the English American colonies, dates to 1608 (Reggio, 1997). Officials executed a man named George Kendall, of Virginia, for supposedly plotting to betray
Inviting the reader to explore diverse ways of thinking about the morality of capital punishment. First, foundationally the death penalty seems moral, the act of wrongdoing results in wrongdoing being done upon the actor. However, this is a very hypocritical and barbaric way of punishment for a human being. One of the main purposes of prisons was to strip criminals of their rights and keep them secluded from society, which is a serious punishment in and of itself. It is extremely unnecessary to take away a person’s life, regardless of what crime they committed.
When European colonists came to the America, they brought the tradition of capital punishment. Capital punishment came on the North American shore with the British colonies. The first recorded case of capital punishment was established in the new colonies. Captain George Kendall was first executed in 1608 in the Jamestown colony of Virginal Unite State. First execution was by hanging to the
Is capital punishment justice? Capital punishment, also known as the death penalty, remains to be one of the most hotly debated issues in the justice system. This subject contains large gray areas concerning many aspects of what is we consider modern justice. Many wonder if such a punishment should be allowed in our modern society. The argument of this paper is to convince others that capital punishment and all that it entails is a practical and just form of delivering justice, providing both secular and religious explanations as to why the death penalty is just.
The legitimacy of the use of capital punishment has been tarnished by its widespread misuse , which has clouded our judgment regarding the justifiability of the death penalty as a punitive measure. However, the problems with capital punishment, such as the “potential error, irreversibility, arbitrariness and racial skew" , are not a basis for its abolition, as the world of homicide suffer from these problems more acutely. To tackle this question, one must disregard the currently blemished universal status quo and purely assess the advantages and disadvantages of the death penalty as a punitive measure. Through unprejudiced examination of the death penalty and its consequential impacts, it is evident that it is a punishment that effectively serves its retributive, denunciatory, deterrent, and incapacitative goals.
This paper examines the topic of capital punishment as a relevant public policy that is related to criminal justice. The history, justification and evidence for the policy, factors that have influenced the policy, competing positions and stakeholders, negative consequences of the policy, and evidence based changes to the current policy, will all be discussed. Relevant examples will be provided within each appropriate section. A comprehensive approach will be used to identify all key elements in regards to capital punishment. Finally, a concluding paragraph will summarize all salient information and takeaways from this topic.
In the past decades, many policy issues were heard around the courts and one of these matters were the capital penalty. Many citizens agree with the death penalty and some of them do not agree with it. Moreover, this law brings several discussions within the population since Americans have different points of views about death sentence. Furthermore, there are numerous reasons, positive and negative about the death penalty. After all, three positive reasons are morally, fairness and effectiveness.
The first death penalty laws go way back to the eighteenth century, in Babylon. In the tenth century hanging was the major execution style, later in this century William the Conqueror did not allow people to be hanged for any reason unless in times of war, that didn’t last. The American system of capital punishment comes from the British law. In America it mainly started in the ancient western. They encouraged people to seek retribution by killing their offenders; they also started listing what crimes would be reasons to use the death penalty. Around the 17th century government leaders realized crimes harm society and became more involved in controlling and punishing crimes. Laws focused more on keeping peace in society than serving justice. In the ancient Greco-Roman time, the prime reason for execution was to punish those who attacked the religion of the state. Throughout this era, punishment was violent and often means of inflicting torture along with death. During the middle ages it became very important to justify punishing and convicted criminals by making sure they were guilty. The usual methods of determining guilt or innocence at the time were trial by battle, the ordeal and compurgation. Trial by battle pitted the offender and the victim,
This paper will briefly cover the world history of the use of the death penalty as well as its current use in the United States of America. The paper will discuss the statistics of how often the death penalty is utilized as a sentence for capital crimes as well as the time a convicted person spends awaiting the death penalty to be imposed. This paper will utilize research from published sources. This paper will also review current death penalty issues are the occurring in our court systems today.
In the United States, capital punishment has always been the spotlight of many debates concerning the consequences of severe crimes. Although capital punishment is deemed to be acceptable for violent crimes such as murder, there are numerous individuals who oppose the usage of capital punishment against violent offenders. Both proponents and opponents have given countless opinions concerning the deterrence effect of capital punishment. Research studies have also added fuel to the debate in regards to the effectiveness of capital punishment in the criminal justice system. With the differences in between the pros and cons of capital punishment, it is hard to come to a concrete conclusion on whether or not if this element serves its purpose in the penal system. This paper will further discuss if capital punishment is effective in deterring violent crimes as well its implications for the future.
In society there many things that are debated among the people based on their beliefs, morals, and values. For this paper chose the death penalty because it is one of the highly debated topics in not only today’s society but also in the past. The death penalty, also known as capital punishment, it used as a procedure of retaliation against those who commit violent crimes such as murder and other capital crimes. There are many forms of this punishment, for instance, the electric chair, lethal injections, and the firing squad. There are many feelings and arguments in relation to capital punishment. Some people believe that the death penalty is moral because they deserve it and it provides protection to the society. However, in this paper I will argue that capital punishment is totally immoral because it is not fair, is it unnecessary, and unethical.
Capital punishment has been used as a penalty for criminal behavior for many years; however, its’ utilization has not been constant throughout American history. The basis of capital punishment has undergone a number of changes and improvements in the past, essentially alternating in and out of public favor. At its’ start, capital punishment was ultimately used as a means of torture. Criminals were bludgeoned, boiled, burned, torn apart by animals, etc.—it was an ultimate torture method. Throughout the advancement of capital punishment, many legislators eliminated the use of death penalty as sanction for certain crimes, thus promoting the idea that a punishment should fit the crime to which it is being applied. In this regard, a number of pros and cons have been established in essence of the death penalty. Likewise, each of the U.S. states have developed respective laws pertaining to the use of capital punishment. The state of Texas, in particular, is one that sanctions capital punishment as a legal penalty for certain crimes.
This essay will out line the historical and definition of capital punishment. In the time of life each crime should have sentence which makes the criminal stop doing their mistakes again and again. People might not agree with some laws, their should believes that laws made only to protects them and their houses, farms, cars , also their life. There are a huge number of crimes such as robbery and assault on the street. If we couldn't find a sentence or laws to stop that which putting people life into a risk. It is hard to live in some places because crimes. Most of crimes are happened in dark pirod of the day. Some people thought that is it hard to control the night's crimes. Almost all people are fair from the death so that makes them agree that capital punishment is a great way to avid criminal. The death penalty is in common between King Hammurabi, Mosaic Law, and Hittite Code.
The purpose of this paper is to examine the ideas and views towards the death penalty. The death penalty has had a various view on whether it should be eliminated from the system due to the idea of it being cruel and unusual. While other view it as an effective way of keeping the serious criminals completely off the streets. The death penalty laws came existent around the eighteenth century. Most of America’s influence and methods for carrying out a death penalty came from Britain which is what they brought with them when they moved to the new land.
The debate on whether or not the death penalty should be abolished has been ongoing for quite a long period of time. While there are those who believe that the death penalty does not serve its intended purpose, proponents of the same are convinced that the relevance of the same cannot be overstated and hence it should not be abolished. In this text, I examine the arguments for and against the death penalty.
Capital punishment is beneficial to the community. It provides the society with a sense of security. The death penalty contains a positive influence on the future. A heavily debated topic is, “Does capital punishment deter people more than a life sentence to prison?” An explanation on why will be covered later. An issues many people have with capital punishment, is when it is just or not just. This is a topic many stray away from, because it is difficult to decide. Finding the right consequence for an action is difficult. While this paper is for the use of capital punishment, it is clearly not needed for every crime, or even every murder. Overusing capital punishment, such as using it for every murder, will negatively impact the country, and not using it has the same effect.