Capital Punishment Essay

The system works that the criminal does the crime, the criminal gets caught, tried and convicted, and it is understood that the punishment will be severe. The person the criminal has killed no longer has a part to play in this. Unfortunately the murderer has deprived their family and friends of a loved one. Their grief begins with the murder. “It may not end with the murderer’s execution, but the execution does engender a feeling of relief at no longer having to think about the ordeal- a feeling which often fails to arise while the murder still lives on” (The Facts). the system in place currently is there for the purpose of granting justice, cannot do so for the surviving victims, unless the murderer himself is put to death (The Facts).

The death penalty is a hotly debated topic in the society today. The aims of the criminal justice system are to protect people in the society from the offenders who are not rehabilitated as well as rehabilitate offenders. Using death penalty is one of the primary methods to reach these ends. Nonetheless, it is the most questionable means of achieving these goals. Is it ethically right? Whether the death penalty is morally right or not, one issue remains. With or without capital punishment individuals in the society still, commit crimes. Therefore, the death penalty is not an effective deterrent to crime, and it cannot be justified based on its deterrent effect.

Have you ever thought how many criminals get away with intolerable crimes without getting any punishments. The controversy about whether or not the death penalty looked at as unethical or perhaps needed has been discussed throughout every state and 31 states have already applied it. Criminals need a higher penalty for those who don’t care about going to jail. Criminals commit many crimes, making them a menace to society, and committing a crime can be harmful towards others and other's families. The death penalty allows the state to give appropriate retribution, criminals must face the consequences of their action. Along with historical writings like the constitution and the bible, both state that death should be done to anyone who commits murder, larcency, rapes, and burglary. Life sentences for criminals that deserve death penalty put an unfair financial burden on the state (Dave Anderson). Every prisoner has to be taken care for which makes a lot of costs and taxes.

One side of this debate is being for the death penalty. According to Van Den Haag (1983), people fear death more than life in prison. Having the death penalty will be a consequence that people don’t want to face so it will help decrease future murder. Also, Swift (2014) states that they deserve being put to death. They knew before they did the crime that the consequence for murder is being put to death. He also argues that having them put to death will help stop further crime and overcrowding of prisons.

Many criminals who commit murder are sentenced to death for the crimes they have committed. The death penalty is a highly controversial practice and the question that must be raised is: Should society continue to use the death penalty as a punishment for heinous crimes? Currently, this turbulent topic continues to be argued. According to the Death Penalty Information Center, there are already eighteen states that have abolished this archaic form of justice. Our society is moving towards a time and place where the death penalty is no longer an acceptable form of punishment. The use of the death sentence should be abolished from the justice system. The death sentence is an ineffective form of punishment that is morally wrong, potentially causes unnecessary deaths of innocent people, is costly, and does not accomplish the task that it has been instated to fulfill which is the prevention of crime.

Killing another person is one of the worst actions someone can take. It is “so evil that the perpetrator forfeits his own right to life. He or she deserves to die” (Pojman, 2005). Examples such as Ted Bundy, who raped and killed over 100 women and John Mohammed and John Lee Malvo who killed 12 people in a shooting spree in 2002, deserved to die for the awful crimes they committed (Pojman, 2005). Locking these criminals behind bars with life sentences would not serve as a severe enough punishment for the horrible acts they chose to commit.

It is thinks that death penalty prevents future murderers and the society has always used punishment to discourage future criminals from wrongdoing. As the society has

Today, one of the most debated issues in the Criminal Justice System is the issue of capital punishment or the death penalty. Having said that, crime is imminent. We could have an unexpected encounter with a criminal committing crime on a daily. Criminals have become a part of our daily lives. Does this mean we should let them prevail in our society? No, absolutely not. Eliminating crime and criminals is our duty, and we must not ignore it. Getting the rightly accused to a just punishment is very important. Some criminals commit a crime because they have no other option to survive, but some do it for fun. I do not advocate death penalty for everybody. A person, who stole a piece of clothing from a department store, definitely does not deserve the death penalty. However, a serial killer, who kills people just because or for malicious reasons, definitely deserves the death penalty. The death penalty should continue, in order to eliminate the garbage out of our society. Not everybody deserves to die, but some people definitely do. I support the death penalty for several reasons. Primarily, I believe that the death penalty serves as a deterrent and assists with reducing crime. Moreover, the death penalty assures safety to our society by eliminating these criminals.

Capital Punishment, also known as the death penalty is a legal sentence for a criminal to be put to death. The Punishment is rising to a controversial topic and has led to a lot of heated debates. As of 2014, over 150 countries have abolished the death penalty and 40 others have not used it in recent years, although it is still legal. The death Penalty is mostly used in extreme cases of crime like rape or murder. The convicted criminals are mostly put to death in inhuman ways such as lethal injections or electric chairs. The execution can only take place after a proper legal trial and can only be used by the state. As versatile as humankind is, they invented the term “death penalty” to contrast with the sanctity of life. The topic should

Many factors arise that deserve attention with regards to capital punishment that I see prove that it is an invalid, and unnecessary punishment.. Deterrence always come to mind with thinking about the death penalty, and has much controversy. Research indicates that the effect of capital punishment for a crime is not informative about whether capital punishment decreases, increases, or has no effect on the crime rate. I personally believe that capital punishment is a deterrent for others from committing similar crimes. According to a study published in the Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 88% of the country’s top criminologists do not believe the death penalty acts a

It is argued that the death penalty does not contribute to the deterrence of crime, but rather raises the crime rate. Countries use the death penalty for reasons regarding their legal, political, and religious belief systems. Capital punishment is used to prevent possible crimes, letting possible would-be-criminals be aware that they would be put to death if they committed a very offensive treason against the government. It is the ultimate warning against all crimes. If someone is thinking of committing a severe crime, he or she would be more apprehensive and hesitant in committing it due to the fact that they know that the justice system will not spare their life.

punishment in which so called offenders often serve unjust time in prison. Finally, pro-capital punishment

Since society has been in existence, there has always been a pondering question on how to punish criminals. Having the death penalty to actively punish criminals has been debated for many years. Some say it deters crime and others say it unfairly punishes the poor. More than half of the states in America actively use the death penalty. There have been recent debates over the methods used for putting people to death and over the abolishment of the death penalty. Despite its controversial nature, the death penalty must be in effect to diminish the rate of crime, regulate the overcrowding in prisons and for the solemn purpose of incapacitation.

Okay, a murderer commits a crime, now what? Well the convicted murderer usually on average serves a sentence of less than six years according to Nancy Jacobs. Six years behind bars for taking the life of another person! Six years of paying taxes to feed the mouth of a person who not caring for others took the life of somebody. Want some statistics? Well according to Justice for All, “Six percent of the young adults paroled since 1978 who were convicted of murder were arrested for murder again within six years of their release.” So what was the point of arresting them in the first place only to release them after a measly six years of prison time? If these people would have be executed the first time they were captured and convicted of murder, we would have prevented many murders of innocent people.

The Death Penalty is, undeniably, one of the most controversial issues of our day. Emotional tensions are high between those who hold human life above justice and those who hold justice above all human life. The Death Penalty, along with all other forms of criminal punishment, is barbaric. This form of punishment, indeed all forms of criminal justice, truly shows the level to which society has sunk. When people stand outside prisons and cheer as prisoners are murdered, there is a problem. When personal bloodlust is held above moral ideologies, there is a problem. When human life is assigned a value and weighed against other alternatives, there is a problem. The state speaks of Justice, but this word is only a reflection of the confusion,