Are serial criminals effectively being punished? Indeed much improvement must be done. The death penalty needs to be legal in every state. Capital punishment is the lawful infliction of death as a punishment and has been used in America since 1608. The death penalty has been mainly aimed at murder and rape perpetrators. For the past two hundred years with over 15,600 executions since 1608, most executions were completed though hangings; however, beginning in the 1900s new forms of execution developed. Although the death penalty is said to be more expensive, unethical, racially unfair, and cruel, than life without parole, each is flawed in its assumption. First, the cost of executing a person is far higher than that of giving them life …show more content…
Needless to say crime rates would lower drastically. A case study in Texas, which accounts for far more executions than any other state, is now showing clear evidence of a deterrent effect. In 1980, Texas had a murder rate of 16.88/100,000; however, in 2000 the murder rate was 5.9/100,000. In that same time frame, when execution was not a very long process the United States murder rate declined by fifty-four percent. The United States homicide rate dropped from 24,526 in 1993 to 15,522 in 1999 during a period of increased use of the death penalty. This is proven evidence that the death penalty deters. On the contrary, it is believed that racism is administered in the death penalty; however, statistics prove otherwise. At the end of 2007 the racial diversity was 1,804 white, 1,345 black, thirty five Asian, twenty six American Indian, and ten unknown. Also white prisoners are more liable to be sentenced to death, and less likely to have sentences commuted than black defendants. Although earlier times when blacks were looked down upon and they were not considered equals, this may have occurred. Racism is no longer a factor, and can no longer be used as an excuse. Lastly, the death penalty is “Cruel and unusual punishment”. Torture is cruel and unusual; needless to say, the United States does not allow torture until death. Lethal injection is the most used way of execution in the
Opposed on capital punishment. Capital punishment is also known as the death penalty, this is the most extreme of all the sentencing one can receive. In the US, capital punishment has been present since the establishment of the original colonies. It is especially for capital offenses; as in federal murder, treason, terrorism, espionage, and large scale drug trafficking. Everybody has an indisputable human right to life. This means even the people who commit murder. Sentencing someone to death and executing them violates this right we all have. Everyone believes that human life is valuable. Some of those against capital punishment believe that human life is so valued that even the worst killers should not be deprived of the value of their lives. These people believe that the value of the offender's life cannot and should not be destroyed by the criminal’s bad
The Death Penalty in America has been a talked about issue for some time now. Americans have their own opinions on the death penalty. Some people feel it is too harsh of a punishment, some believe if you take a life you should lose your life. I myself do not believe in the death penalty. To me it goes totally against what Americas was built on God. Even though over the last fifteen years or so we have slowly drifted away from “In God We Trust”. Looking at the death penalty in a whole it was never something that the United States came up with. It was adopted from Britain. (Bohm, 1999)The first ever recorded death penalty in United States history was that of Captain George Kendall in 1608. He was executed for being a spy. The death of Captain Kendall started a chain of other colonies jumping on board for the death penalty. In some colonies they were sentencing people to death for petty crimes, such as steeling, or trading with Indians. Over the years after the death penalty would be reformed and revamped numerous of times. Until it was only used when murder or treason occurred. Matter of fact Pennsylvania was the first state
If the defendant was found guilty in one of the thirty five United States that enforced the death penalty, he would most likely be executed by means of lethal injection. Lethal injection has proven to be the most humane way of euthanizing criminals. Before this, up to 4 different methods had been used in the United States. These included hangings, firing squads, gas chambers and the infamous electric chair.
The use of the death penalty has brought peace of mind to our citizens. Though through the mid nineteen sixties until the early nineteen eighties only about six death penalties actually took effect. When the number of executions dropped, the murder rate rose from 5.6 per 100,000 people to 10.2 which is almost double the murder rate. A society cannot live in fear but needs to live in reassurance and protection. As of nineteen ninety-nine, the murder rate dropped dramatically to 5.7 because the execution rate increased to 47 executions. Pearce, Matt. "Counterpoint: Defending The Death Penalty." Points Of View: Death Penalty (2014): 6. Points of View Reference Center. Web. 23 Sept. 2014. This demonstrates the deterrent effect capital punishment has on society. The result is deterrence shows if one kills then one will be punished for their actions and crime.
The costs of dealing out the death penalty are much more expensive than just giving life sentences. This expenses happen are due to the safeguards that are given to death row inmates by the constitution. These safeguards include giving two trails, one for being proven guilty
The use of capital punishment in the U.S. is a growing concern for most American citizens. According to statistics, seventy percent of Americans are in support of the death penalty, while only thirty percent are against it. These statistics show that few people are against capital punishment (“Fact” 1). With the use of the death penalty growing the controversy is becoming more heated. With only twelve states left not enforcing it the resistance is becoming futile (“Fact” 4). Many debates have been made and even clauses have been invoked, such as, the “Cruel and Unusual Clause” that was invoked by the Supreme Court in 1962 (Meltsner 179). The use of death as a punishment has been viewed as “cruel
Professor Robert B. Ekelund of Auburn University and his colleagues analyzed the effect that executions have on single murder rates, while there was no effect on multiple murder rates”. In another study, Professor Robert B. Ekelund did find that “capital punishment does, in fact, save lives. Each additional execution appears to deter between three and 18 murders”. Professor Joanna M. Shepherd of Emory University found that each execution, on average, results in 18 fewer murders. By using state-level panel data from 1960 to 2000 they came up with three crucial findings. “First, each execution, on average, is associated with three fewer muders. The deterred murders include both crimes of passion and murders by inmates. Second, executions deter
A study conducted by the Journal of Quantitative Criminology reveals that for every execution performed, fifteen murders take its place (Durlauf, et al). The study compiled execution statistics and murder rates across states in order to determine the efficacy of deterrence. Granted, executions do not directly lead to murders, but the data exposes the fact that the death penalty has not been successful in preventing them. In fact crime rates increase in states that resume the practice of the death penalty. For example, Florida had a twenty-eight percent increase in murder rates after executing a prisoner in 1979 for the first time after fifteen years (“White
The opposing side of the death trial have been getting a lot of attention, but what people fail to realize is that between 3 and 181 lives would be saved by the execution of each convicted killer. A study in 2006 found that each execution results in five fewer homicides, which follows the theory “If the cost becomes too
The death penalty is one of the most controversed punishments in the United States. According to The Death Penalty Information Center, 88% of criminologist do not believe the death penalty is an effective deterrent. According to deterrence theory, criminals are no different from law abiding people. Individuals settle on their choices taking into account the net expenses and advantages of every option. There is a basis provided for analyzing how capital punishment should influence murder rates, according to the deterrence theory. Throughout the years, a few studies have shown a connection in the middle of executions and reductions in homicide rates.
The death penalty information center explains that the criminologists that were surveyed do not believe that the death penalty lowers murder rates in states that enforce capital punishment. The criminologists also
Since 1976, 138 people have been put on death row (oadp.org). This happens more often than death penalty supporters would like to believe. One reason that innocent people may be put to death is because they may get poor representation at trial. The possibility of killing another innocent, wrongfully accused person is too much to risk. To kill an innocent person is morally irresponsible and highly reprehensible. Along with innocent lives, the method of choosing the people who receive capital punishment is wrong. It is supposed to be a random choosing, but that is in fact not true. African Americans are four percent more likely to get killed on death row than a white person. Three percent of death row trials are based on sex and heritage. Not only does this make our system discriminatory, it makes them very wrong.
Crime in America is something that has been around for many decades. While a large number of crimes are considered minor, many more result in the serious injury or death of another human being. “When we think about crimes, we … normally focus on inherently wrongful acts that harm or threaten to harm persons or property” (Bibas 22). The death penalty, also called capital punishment, has been used as a means of punishing the most violent of criminals in an attempt to prevent others from committing similar crimes. Over the centuries, the methods used to conduct these executions have evolved and changed due to effectiveness and public opinion.
Defenders of the death penalty often claim that the execution of criminals will teach others not to do bad, initially decreasing crime rates. This hasty form of generalization statistically proves to be wrong. “When it comes to criminals, Texas has the toughest punishments along with a strict court system. The state of Texas spent four hundred and seventy million dollars in 2001 just for punishing convicts. Despite all that money and stern punishment, the crime rate is still twenty four percent higher than the national average, according to 2003 data” (Gonzales). This supports the fact that tough punishment doesn’t necessarily help crime. Ironically, the harshest state in the U.S continues to house the maximum number of criminal acts. The death penalty, a harsh form of punishment, clearly doesn’t lower crime rate.
Some of those who support the death penalty base their argument on the fact that it is a cost-effective alternative to life imprisonment. However, it may be more costly to execute an inmate than to have that person serve a life sentence (Amnesty International, 1987). A 1982 study in New York concluded that the average capital murder trial and the first stage of appeals costs U.S. tax-payers 1.8 million dollars (Bohm, 1987). It is estimated that this is less than it would cost to incarcerate someone for one hundred years. Other sources estimate that it can cost up to 2.2 million dollars to obtain and carry out a death sentence (Johnson, 1990). The principal factor in this cost is the appeals process, which lasts an average of ten years and is deemed necessary to reduce the likelihood of the execution of an innocent person.