Career Burglars

There are numerous theories as to why a crime is committed. Rational choice theory, which is a subset of classical theory, says that before people commit a crime they think about what they are going to do. They weigh the pros and cons before committing the criminal act. The rational choice theory is well suited for the causation of burglary. The support for this theory is that burglars do not commit crime for the fun of it or just because they want to. It is usually because they need money to keep their heads above water. In their situation, they do not see any other way than to steal to make a living. The opposition for rational choice theory is that criminals do not think before they act as they may be incapable of thinking

This paper summarizes four theories of criminology. Rational choice theory states that criminals act based on a thought process that weighs the pros and cons of criminality. Criminologists who believe in this theory feel that most criminals are people capable of having rational thoughts before committing a crime. Trait theory is the view of criminology that suggests criminality is a product of abnormal biological or psychological traits. Criminologists who believe in this theory feel that criminals choose to commit crime because of a brain anomaly or chemical imbalance. Social structure theory is “a view that disadvantaged economic class position is a primary cause of crime” (Seigel 139). Those who follow this theory often believe social forces can have a great effect on whether or not a person commits a crime. An example would be those who are poor are more being more prone to commit crime. Social process theory is a view that criminality depends on how a person interacts with different organizations and institutions and processes in society. For example, a family would be considered

(Torres, S. 1998) Research indicates that fear of crime, whether self-imposed or realistic, can immobilize individuals, harm the local economy and negatively impact social interactions as well as the quality of life (Albanese, 1990 Skogan (1987) argues that crime victims believe that more crime exists, are worried about victimization and attempt to protect themselves. Parker and Ray (1990) as well as Krannich et al. (1989) revealed victimization to be a predictor related to fear of crime. Additional support for these findings was provided by Smith and Hill (1991), who showed that actual victimization appears to increase fear of crime by increasing the perception of vulnerability. (Torres, S. 1998) Research also shows that fear of crime among minorities and those of lower socioeconomic status is related to their vulnerability in the urban environment (Liska et al., 1982). The elderly who are physically vulnerable and less agile are more fearful of crime even though they are less likely to be victims. (Torres, S. 1998) The proliferation and presence of gangs in the United States is also linked to the concept of social incivilities and increased fear of crime. This problem of fear does not go away. The people not only have a constant fear, it continues to the next generation of people in

Burglary has an undeniably large presence in society. Consequently, there is significant discourse surrounding the major criminogenic forces that motivate burglars. As a result, this essay asserts that to a large extent, strain theory provides the most effective explanation for burglary. However, this essay recognises the limitations of strain theory, thus the essay acknowledges the smaller, albeit still significant roles that theories like Seduction of Crime theory and Conflict theory play in explaining burglary. To develop this hypothesis, a number of factors are explored. First however, a definition of burglary must be established; for the purposes of this essay, the Common Law definition shall be used. Additionally, strain theory’s fundamental

This book provides an excellent and brilliant dissection of the issue of crime and criminal behavior

Criminal behavior has been around for centuries, which is why many criminologist study and create theories based on criminal behaviors. They do this as a preventative measure, if you can find a causation of a crime you can stop its occurrences. Criminologist, took these theories and broke them down into three major factors of criminal behavior, psychological, sociological, and biological. Each factor focuses on a key component of criminal behavior, which is explained in theories. However, these theories all have strengths and weaknesses, which is what will be illustrated in this article.

These routines influence offenders to commit robbery since it bring together targets at their locations or separate targets from their locations, for example, special events, holidays and annual routines. Offenders know during the holidays individuals are carrying large sums of cash for shopping. People can become victims at special events where there is alcohol and become less aware of surroundings. There are commuting patterns of robbery where victims may have to take detours on other routes and may get lost and become a victim. Offenders’ ideal locations when committing robbery are areas where there is no guardianship. These areas lack people that can aid robbery victims, but can cause these guardians to become secondary robbery victims or lead to other crimes like murder. Offenders also like areas that provide quick escape routes from the crime scene or areas of familiarity since the offender will be aware of the routines of the victims and whether guardians or police patrol the area. The occurrence of robberies can cause a major problem of fear mainly for the victim, but also within the community the crime took place. Robbery victims feel vulnerable, not able to carry out daily routines without the fear of being robbed again, a feeling of guilt that it was their fault the crime occurred. Robbery victims feel they don’t have control and fear to lose their

Property crime and burglary are still a subject were people are scared of, even is the numbers have fallen there are always many victims of those crimes. In this paper this research will examine the public’s fear of burglary in London. On this study there is three objectives to achieve to understand and explore this fear.

When it comes to a criminal career in criminals, it depends on the four dimensions for examples participation, with participation a criminal, those who decide to associate themselves with the life of crime or those who deter themselves from it. This focuses on life paths and certain transitions that people go through relationships, peers, marriage change people to either mature to become responsible and go towards the right path to want to become

The demographics of urban areas show a younger population more susceptible to be a victim of a crime. The principal findings for the most part supported the spatio-temporal theory. Burglaries were found to almost always occur in spatio-temporal fashion making the closeness of urban residency a perfect target for burglaries. Robberies occur in same areas, but longer windows of time. A series of robberies are significant for the first 1-2 days and then lose significance for a 4-6 day window and return to significance around day 8. An urban setting allows for robbers to observe their targets more closely. Robbers typically engage in these easy and profitable targets in the urban settings rather than leaving their known territory unless for a major incentive. They found the urban Cincinnati's setting hosted an environment conducive to criminal behavior, “The likelihood of illicit activities often increases in neighborhoods ridden with socio-economic strife and in urban environments conducive to criminal behavior” (Grubesic & Mack 299). The conclusion of the study emphasized the importance of the Knox and Jacquez k

Some scholar has talked about number of components that impact the extent of wrongdoing. In some of these components, they specify statistic which is viewed as the as the most grounded elements of wrongdoing rates and subsequently have been fundamental to expectations about the eventual fate of wrongdoing. The statistic variable that appears to most impact wrongdoing is the extent of the male populace inside the wrongdoing inclined years of 15 to 25. Accordingly, it has been contended that the age structure of a general public has the most compelling impact on the level of wrongdoing in a general public. Time arrangement examinations that associate authentic property wrongdoing patterns with statistic and financial estimates demonstrate an upward weight on property wrongdoing later on subsequently of current increments in utilization consumptions and a few increments in the quantity of youthful guys (Field, 1998; Dhiri et al., 1999). Conversely, Deadman (2000), utilizing a similar estimate values for the customer utilization, and unemployment factors as Dhiri et al., predicts a slight decrease in private robberies in the initial couple of years of the 21st

The property crime rates of 45.7% occurs more in urban areas. About 16.8% of the crimes were committed by high school dropouts and only 0.4% of the crimes that occurs were related to the population density. The type of property crimes that happens includes larceny-theft, home burglary, home invasion, grand theft auto, forgery, and arson. These types of crimes may be caused by factors such as high school dropouts, the population density per square mile, and people living in urban areas. The paper will focus on the crimes against properties such as larceny-theft, home burglary, and grand theft auto, not a person.

The logic of some individuals has attempted to justify the criminal activity of offenders. Essentially, unlawful behavior has been attributed to a number of conditions such as the offender’s environment and the nature of the adversities they have encountered. For example, it can be contended that a lawbreaker committed an infraction because of the absence of positive adult influences present during their childhood or that they were compelled by need in which they may have resorted to stealing as a means of survival. Ultimately, although a degree of reason may exist to warrant an offender’s actions, they cannot evade that fact that they are predominately accountable for their misconduct. Thus, except in the most exceptional of circumstances, the decision for individuals to violate the law is impermissible. Burglary is one type of crime in which its severity may be minimized because physical harm was not sustained by the victims. However, burglary can deprive victims of their sense of security and strip them of irreplaceable possessions. Furthermore, such an outcome had materialized when the home of Trinidad and Maria Lupercio was breached. Overall, a burglary was perpetuated at the Lupercio residence and in Arizona; this particular case qualifies as burglary in the second degree due to the elements of the crime.

The aim of this essay is to attempt to identify the epistemology implicated in the research conducted by Emmeline Taylor about the decision making process of burglars. Essay begins with a concise definition of Criminology and a brief outline of ‘Rational Choice Theory’ which can be utilised to understand the decision making process of offenders and to provide a background for the notion of the rationality among burglars whilst acting criminal behaviour. Then it will continue with the explanation of the some key notions underpinning the theoretical assumptions of a study to be presented. It will conclude with the final consideration of epistemological stance of the study.

The purpose of this research proposal is to facilitate understanding of what different factors may affect crime occurrence. In this proposal, several independent variables such as age, race, social class, and gender will be examined to see how they affect crime occurrence. Additionally, the proposal evaluates information from previously conducted research to strengthen its research and to get the answers that it seeks. Furthermore, this research proposal evaluates three research questions that will be answered throughout the