Case Analysis : Johnson And Johnson

NIKE, Inc., is a company that was founded in by William Jay Bowerman and Philip H. Knight in 1964, and was originally called Blue Ribbon Sports, Inc. It’s name was changed to Nike, Inc. in 1971. It’s base of operation is located in Beaverton, Oregon. NIKE, Inc., is the world’s leading designer, marketer and distributor of authentic athletic footwear, apparel, equipment and accessories for a wide variety of sports and fitness activities worldwide. Entirely owned Nike subsidiaries include Converse Inc., a brand that develops, advertises, and sells athletic apparel and accessories; and also Hurley International LLC, which designs, markets and sells surf and youth lifestyle clothing and many different accessories. Its athletic footwear products are designed primarily for specific athletic use, although a large percentage of the products are worn for casual or leisure purposes. Nike offers products in many different categories such as men’s/women’s training, running, basketball, golf, and more. The company also sells products designed for children and youth athletic activities such as baseball, cricket, lacrosse, outdoor activities, football, tennis, volleyball, walking, and wrestling. Also, Nike sells sports apparel and accessories; and markets apparel with licensed college and professional team and league logos. Further, it sells a line of performance equipment and accessories, including sports bags, balls, eyewear, digital devices, bats, gloves, protective equipment, golf

Intellectual Property: Johnson & Johnson have the rights to many products including: JOHNSON’S® BEBE® PENATEN® PRIM’AGE® JOHNSON’S® BEDTIME™ JOHNSON’S® SOOTHING NATURALS™ DESITIN® NATUSAN® NEUTROGENA® SHOWER TO SHOWER®PIZ BUIN® AVEENO® LUBRIDERM®AMBI® SKINCARE VENDOME® CLEAN & CLEAR® PURPOSE® ROC® ROGAINE® BAND-AID® Brand Adhesive Bandages BENGAY® CALADRYL® PURELL® NEOSPORIN® CORTAID® SAVLON® COMPEED® TUCKS® DAKTARIN® LISTERINE® EFFERDENT® LISTERINE® WHITENING REMBRANDT® REACH® STAYFREE® MONISTAT® CAREFREE® e.p.t.® K-Y® O.B.® TYLENOL® SUDAFED® ROLAIDS® DOLORMIN® MOTRIN® MOTILIUM® MYLANTA® ZYRTEC® and ZYRTEC-D®12-HOUR® BENADRYL® IMODIUM® PEPCID® NICORETTE® SPLENDA® LACTAID® BENECOL® SUN CRYSTALS™ VIACTIV® VISINE® ACUVUE® CONCERTA® REMINYL® /RAZADYNE® TOPAMAX® HALDOL® RISPERDAL® INVEGA® RISPERDAL® CONSTA® DORIBAX™ PREZISTA™ INTELENCE™ RETIN-A MICRO® LEVAQUIN®ORTHOCLONE OKT-3® REMICADE® DURAGESIC® AXERT® ORTHOVISC® ULTRAM® ER Tylenol® with Codeine DITROPAN XL® TERAZOL®ORTHO TRI-CYCLEN®ELMIRON® ORTHO-CYCLEN® ORTHO TRI-CYCLEN® LO ORTHO EVRA® ORTHO-NOVUM®RhoGAM® DACOGEN® PROCRIT® DOXIL® VELCADE® LEUSTATIN® ACIPHEX®/PARIET® REGRANEX® NATRECOR® REOPRO®. They also have the patents and copyrights to a wide array of drugs and medical equipment.

Johnson & Johnson, a 130 years old famous multinational healthcare company through its family of companies is involved in the research and development, manufacture and sale of a wide range of products in the healthcare. Product that related to human health and well-being has always been their main interest over the years and also presently. Johnson & Johnson was incorporated in the State of New Jersey in 1887 by three brothers; Robert Wood Johnson, James Wood Johnson and Edward Mead Johnson.

As consultant to Sanders and Myers, I would suggest they rethink the continuation of economic value added (“EVA”) bonus payout process. The proposed EVA bonus payout structure is supposed to be an objective way to gauge and reward employee performance; however, through no fault of their own, the Dermatology group is slated to undergo severe ebbs and flows in their incentive and could potentially wreak havoc on employee morale and retention.

Johnson and Johnson, commonly called J&J for short, is one of the world's well known, largest, most decentralized and most diversified health care companies. Since 1887, Johnson and Johnson has been producing, manufacturing and selling products related to human health and well-being. Today J&J has over 200 autonomous operating companies and do business globally specializing in consumer products, medical devices and diagnostics, and pharmaceuticals. Consumer products are the company's most recognizable segment, including popular brands like Tylenol, Johnson and Johnson Baby Shampoo and Band-Aid. The medical devices and diagnostics segment manufactures products including surgical equipment

To apply utilitarianism to this ethical controversy one has to evaluate which option would benefit society

Let’s start by gaining an understanding of what utilitarianism means. The definition given to us earlier in our textbook, Exploring Ethics, in the article, Strengths and Weaknesses of Utilitarianism, it defines act utilities as an act that, “is right if and only if it results in as much good as any available alternative”. This goes back to the tedious task of trying to analyze countless number of alternatives and figure out which one brings about the most

The public has been alerted about these problems starting in 2008. A safety warning was put out regarding the risk of such complications brought on by the trans vaginal placement of surgical mesh to treat the problems. Since 2008 it has brought on over 1000 cases of issues from nine different mesh manufacturers and continues to

availability of substitutes 1, and the threat of retaliation from incumbents (by lowering price, for

Scope, a green mint tasting mouthwash, was positions as a great tasting mouth refreshing brand that provided bad breath protection. It is the first brand that offers both effective protection against bad breath and a better taste than other mouthwashes.

A Utilitarian standpoint weighs the hedons and dolors in a situation. Ultimately it says that the most ethical thing to do

From deontological ethicist Immanuel Kant’s reasoning this is unethical as “Each individual is valued, not on what they can do, but on that fact that they are persons. Treating them as means to an end does not give them the individual freedom they deserve. Treating them as an end in itself looks at what would be best for that person” (Nelson, 2009).

This mouthwash market was initially developed by Warner-Lambert being pioneered by brand Listerine. In 1977 Warmer-Lambert launched Listermint mouthwash as a direct competitor to Scope. Before 1987 the mouthwash market was continuously growing on average of 3 percent per year, in 1987 the market experienced a 26 percent increase after the introduction of new flavor. In 1976 Scope was the leader in the Canadian market.

United Beverages’ CEO is debating with his department heads on the course of action the company is going to take in the future. Their flagship product, GangBuster, has been highly successful for the past 5 years. However, they have been thinking of entering the market for Energy Drinks for kids. Paul Diaz also comes up with a revolutionary idea of the dual-drink, having two separate flavored drinks in a bottle and being able to mix both flavors. Due to the limited resources of United Beverages, they have two weeks to decide whether to expand their portfolio or not?

The utilitarian view takes this into account where the Natural Law does not take into consideration the long term effects. I believe that the utilitarian view on this issue is a more plausible and realistic viewpoint in today’s society.