Case Analysis : Mumbai Police Arrested Two Girls Shaheen Dhada And Rinu Srinivasan Essay

This law emphasizes that citizens will not be allowed to any type of searching or arresting without any specific reason by the

They appealed on penalty, The hearing officer made fundamental errors in both principals and law. She considered disciplinary matters for 1999 and 2000 which clearly postdated 1997 offence, when making the decision of the 12 day suspension she clearly had antecedents in her mind. Clearly they where not antecedents and should not have been considered. After getting a new hearing they decided that

The emotional increment in the quantity of ladies in jail in this nation is a consequence of changes in criminal equity arrangement that were expected to 'really begin to tackle wrongdoing' and pay a 'war on medications'. The outcome of these strategies for ladies is from time to time said and even less is caught wind of their effect on youngsters. 76.4% of the ladies in State detainment facilities are moms contrasted with 59.6% of male detainees who are fathers. (As indicated by the Department of Justice). As a rule the offspring of detained men live with their moms some time recently, amid and after their fathers' imprisonment. At the point when moms are sent to jail, their kids are destined to live with a grandparent or other relative (75.2%).

The matter was presented to the Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT) and AAT has different views on this matter and AAT considered the historical Cases and

The accused was released on bail by the police officer on bail under Section 436 Cr.P.C. when he was initially charged with committing the offence punishable under Section 324 I.P.C. which is a bailable offence. Subsequently on the basis of the medical report the offence was converted into one under Section 326 I.P.C., which is a non-bailable offence. As soon as the offence was discovered to be one under section 326 I.P.C. section 436 Cr.P.C. ceases to be applicable to the case of the accused. The investigating officer can in such circumstances take appropriate action to arrest the accused if he desires to do so for investigating the case as a non-bailable offence.

Under these circumstances, my client was misunderstood as she was in a different state of mind and doesn’t deserve the severity of these punishments including larceny under section 117 carrying a maximum sentence of five years imprisonment, common assault under section 61 carrying a maximum of sentence of two years imprisonment and resisting arrest, under section 58 carrying a maximum sentence of five years imprisonment.

According to the principles and rules, I will analyze whether David has committed an offence in the given situation. In this case, he is arrested for breach of the Prohibition of Unsolicited Parties (Fictitious) Act 2010. After analyzing the situation, I found that he was breach of the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act and The Tort of Trespass to land and Nuisance. I will analyze the relationship between those three laws and every situation in detail at the following content, and give some cases of the laws to support the points.

Issue 2 and 5: The Court noted that the exclusion of principles of natural justice (PNJ) is a well known concept and the legislature has the competence to enact such laws. Whether the exclusion of application of PNJ would vitiate the entire proceedings would depend upon the nature and facts of every case in the light of the Act or Rules and Regulation applicable to the case. The Court, then, read into various provisions of the Act and the Competition Commission of India (General) Regulations, 2009 in order to determine the nature of functions of the Commission under various provisions. The Court found that at the face of it, the exercise of power u/s. 26(1) of the Act while forming prima facie opinion is inquisitorial and regulatory. It held that while forming prima facie opinion, the Commission does not condemn anyone. This function is not adjudicatory in nature but merely administrative. This function is in the nature of preparatory measures in contrast to the decision making process and hence

3. About three decades after the passage of the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act of 1974, which diverted and de-institutionalized youths charged for non-criminal offenses, a backlash against the Act created a rise in detention and long term commitments of girls. ​​

In late July 2000, the Court heard submissions from all parties as to whether the various defendants should be exonerated under sections 13175S or 1318 of the Act for these contraventions, or whether some form of penalty or other sanction should be imposed. ASIC submitted to the Court

I 've selected the article because for several reasons: it 's importance in the context of this class, and the First Amendment rights of the defendants. Second, my final paper topic was “Free Speech, First Amendment Rights and 'Terroristic ' Messages”. I 've used the article in my paper and presentation, as well I 've particularly valued the case of Tarek Mehanna, 2012 while giving the examples for the Free speech rights and its protection in case of use and distribution of ' Terroristic ' Messages '.

A significant popular case where a citizen’s internet based Freedom of Speech was violated by the government.

Justice Nariman’s judgment shows us that with the right kind of conviction, it is possible to uncover the importance of free speech as a value unto itself within our larger constitutional scheme. That the court has defended the Constitution’s ideals of tolerance with a sense of vivacity and integrity, and that it has provided the jurisprudence of free speech with an enhanced and rare clarity, must give us hope. It must allow us to believe that we can now challenge the noxious culture of censorship that pervades the Indian state. It also shows us that we do not need an American style First Amendment to achieve liberal ideals; what we require, as the court has demonstrated here, is a government that confirms to our own Constitution, which, when

When one thinks of the juvenile corrections system, they tend to gender this institution, focusing mainly on young boys. Due to this, one often neglects the thought there are also young girls that are in the system. This may be due to the fact that when compared to young boys within the juvenile corrections system, in previous years the girls consisted of a small portion within in this space. However, according to recent studies, girls in the juvenile system has been rapidly increasing over the last 20 years (Levintova, 2015). This is an issue which needs to be acknowledge due to the fact that young women are caught in this system for starkly contrasting reasons when compared to young males. These reasonings are described in the book Girls in Trouble with the Law by Laurie Schaffner which we will further explore.

Chief Justice M. Hameedullah Beg., Justice N. L. Untwalia, Justice P. N. Bhagwati, Justice P. S. Kailasam, Justice S. Murtaza Fazal Ali, Justice V. R. Krishna Iyer and Justice Y. V. Chandrachud.