Case Analysis : Patient Referral Essay

In order to, differentiate between utilization management and case management using the seven case management standards, it is first important to define each individual component. To begin with, a key component of quality and cost effective care is Utilization Management (UM). Utilization management is a way to assure that the appropriate care is medically efficient, a suitable use of health care services, proper procedures, and is applicable with provisions aligned in the health benefits plan. Case Management engages quality services in a timely coordination of patients’ specific needs in an approach that promotes positive outcomes by means that are cost effective. Case management may be developed during a single health care setting that may then transition throughout the care continuum. The seven standards are key components that described to maximize benefits and minimize the opposition.

Research indicates that as many as 13% [Smith 2005] of primary care visits have missing clinical information. A patient's health information is potentially distributed across a wide range of locations including their general practitioner, hospitals, imaging centers, specialists and allied health practices.

Other patient information you may find is documentation for any allergies the patient may have. Insurance information will be noted if the patient is covered were you will find the provider, the billing address, and the patient’s policy number. There will be many different forms in this system that are used to document things such as the patient’s family history, diagnostic results, immunization records, past and present medications taken and the effectiveness of them, and of course there will be doctors notes for any office visits and hospitalizations. In the doctors notes and hospitalization notes you will find documentation for medical conditions or diseases the patient may have had in the past or has presently. Last but certainly not least there will be the common release and authorization forms, there may be advanced directives or living wills on file if the patient has completed them and other relevant information that staff and medical facilities may need to provide quality care for the patient. (Whatis.com, 2008).

How would Ed’s blood help protect him from a foreign invader such as the one now in his system?

After decades of paper based medical records, a new type of record keeping has surfaced - the Electronic Health Record (EHR). EHR is an electronic or digital format concept of an individual’s past and present medical history. It is the principle storage place for data and information about the health care services provided to an individual patient. It is maintained by a provider over time and capable of being shared across different healthcare settings by network-connected information systems. Such records may include key administrative and clinical data relevant to that persons care under a particular provider. Examples of such records may include: demographics, physician notes, problems or injuries, medications and allergies, vital

Quality patient care requires the communication of relevant information between health professionals and/or health systems. Healthcare professionals who regularly work with patients and their confidential medical records should contribute to the development of standards, policies, and laws that protect patient privacy and the confidentiality of health records/information.

The purpose of this discussion board is to describe the Electronic Health Record (EHR), the six steps of an EHR and how my facility implements them, describe “meaningful use” and how my facility status is in obtaining it, and to further discuss the EHR’s and patient confidentiality.

This Stage 1 started from 2011-2012, its objective dealt with data capture and sharing, these sheets are providing these services to assist professionals and hospitals understand the requirements of each objective and demonstrate meaningful use success. This stage also allows qualified providers to receive their payment after fulfilling nine core objectives and one public health objective. The second stage of the Meaningful Use is Stage 2 started in 2014; it dealt with the advanced clinical processes. This Stage introduces new aims and measures, as well as higher entries; it also required health care providers to prolong EHR capabilities to a greater portion of their patient populations. The last stage of the Meaningful Use is Stage 3, this Stage it still in a building phase. Its objective will be focusing on improving quality, safety, efficiency, and leading to improved outcomes. Even though the details of this program have not been finalized, Meaningful Use Stage 3 will work to make the program easier to understand. It will provide the professionals (EPs) and hospitals the ability to exchange and use information between electronic health records, and improve patient outcomes. Based on the current timeline, healthcare providers have the choice to begin Stage 3 Meaningful Use in 2017 but are not permitted to use it until

Quality physician documentation is not only essential to providing superior clinical communication, but also allows for the delivery of useful data that “supports quality metrics, acuity of care, billing, and accurate representation of medical conditions” (Rosenbaum et al., 2014). The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) uses a system to classify Medicare patient’s hospital stays into various groups in order to facilitate payment of services called Medicare Severity-Diagnosis Related Group (MS-DRG). Some payers also use all patient refined (APR)-DRG reimbursement systems. MS-DRG groups are outlined by a specific collection of patient characteristics which include areas specific to the “principle diagnosis, specific secondary diagnoses,

Patient presents to initial intake assessment with medical records (or medical record is received via mail prior to case conference):

As the national health care system transitions to the electronic health record (EHR), it is important to recall the impetus to this reform. Prior to the implementation of the electronic health record, the national health care system encountered many problems that impeded quality patient care. There was not a standardized formal structure with the process. Consequently, it lacked communication across disciplines and among providers and

In addition to the core elements, providers will have to choose any five of the ten additional tasks to implement in 2011-2012. Some examples of these might be clinical lab results, patient appointment reminders and drug-formulary checks. This gives the providers a chance to choose their own path toward full EHR implementation and meaningful use. Legislation ties payments to the achievement of advances in health care processes and outcomes. The regulations are specific as to when providers will have to use particular functions in order to be considered meaningful users. The meaningful use rule acknowledges the urgency of adopting the electronic health record and recognizes the challenges it will pose on all providers.

An Electronic Health Record is a computerized form of a patient’s medical chart. These records allow information to be readily available to authorized providers during a patient’s encounter with the healthcare system. These systems do not only contain medical histories, current medications and insurance information, they also track patients’ diagnoses, treatment plans, immunization dates, allergies, radiology images and lab tests/results (source). The fundamental aspect of EHRs is that they are able to share a patient’s information quickly across service lines and even between different healthcare organizations. Information is at the fingertips of lab techs, primary care physicians, pharmacies, clinics, etc. The

“An electronic health record (EHR) is a digital version of a patient’s paper chart. EHRs are real-time, patient-centered records that make information available instantly and securely to authorized users.” (healthit.gov) The EHR mandate was created “to share information with other health care providers and organizations – such as laboratories, specialists, medical imaging facilities, pharmacies, emergency facilities, and school and workplace clinics – so they contain information from all clinicians involved in a patient’s care.” ("Providers & Professionals | HealthIT.gov", n.d., p. 1) The process has proved to be quite challenging for providers. As an

A twist on the "patient's perspective" approach is to describe a time when medicine failed to save or heal someone close to you. The purpose of this tactic would not of course be to rail against the medical profession, but rather to show how a disappointing loss inspired you to join the struggle against disease and sickness.