Case Analysis : Taser International, Inc. V. Ward Essay

My perspectives mirror the dominant part sentiment on this case since I thought the time limitation mandate was unlawful. I do trust a city may have an enthusiasm for passing laws deminishing conduct for the general's wellbeing and security. Be that as it may, I don't think this was the situation; the law was not sufficiently contracted in Pinellas Park. It did exclude every single sensible exemption, and it positively didn't target just exercises well on the way to bring about wrongdoing. Or maybe, I think Pinella Park was doing the inverse. The disagreeing assessment, then again, felt that the check in time statute was protected. They thought it was impartial, additionally calling attention to that I, alongside the

The research topic we have chosen to research is Tasers. The use of Tasers has been a very controversial topic in the last few years. Reporters, doctors, and human rights groups have all expressed concern that police officers will use a Taser in situations when no weapon is required and concern has also been expressed over if the Taser is really a less-lethal option. No one claims the use of Tasers to be risk-free but studies have found them comparatively safe. We believe that people opposed to Tasers ignore a body of the reports showing the technology is safe and effective. The research question we hope to answer is: Is the deployment of a Taser a safe and viable

Procedural: The United States and Georgia Constitutions allow the Georgia Department of Corrections to compel incarcerated felons to submit saliva samples for DNA profiling, pursuant with O.C.G.A. section 24-4-60. The district court granted summary judgement in favor of the Commissioner of the Georgia Department of Corrections, the Georgia Bureau of Investigation, and the Georgia Department of Corrections. The statute does not violate the Fourth Amendment, the search and seizure provisions of the Georgia Constitution, or the felon’s rights to privacy under the United States or Georgia Constitutions, and was affirmed.

Mr. Aaron Jackson was placed under arrest and charged with illegal possession of the firearm. It was later discovered that the state of Newtown, a place located near New Setonia and where Mr. Jackson lives, had a similar statute. This statute stated the trucks defined in the New Setonia’s law is actually commercial vehicles. Mr. Jackson asked for a motion to suppress the evidence seized from the car. First, the trial court denied this motion, and Mr. Jackson pleaded guilty. Mr. Jackson appealed for a motion to suppress once again, which was denied because it was stated how Officer Raymond’s initial stop was reasonable under the New Setonia law. When Mr. Jackson made yet another appeal, the Court of Appeals decided to hear the case. Now, the question lingering is whether Officer Raymond stopping the Defendant for violating the New Setonia’s statute is

Invented by NASA researcher, John H. Cover, in the 1960’s and 70’s, the TASER® has been widely adopted by police agencies as a non-lethal alternative to guns. While these devices have aided authorities in subduing suspects, it has also resulted in numerous unnecessary deaths. The general perception of the non-lethality of Tasers along with poor judgement on the part of law enforcement has culminated in the over use and apparent misuse of discharge against suspects when alternate options have existed. The following paper will discuss in detail the creation of Conducted Energy Weapons (CEW) and the TASER®; negative medical implications of Tasers and their current use by police enforcement groups; the laws which govern the use of

In 2009 the death of Antonio Galeano, a Queensland man with a mental health condition sparked a joint review by the Crime Misconduct Commission and the Queensland Police of Taser Policy and training. The review was concerned with many aspects of Taser use especially with the over use of Tasers by the Queensland Police against those with an underlying mental health condition and those under the influence of drug and/or alcohol. Although the report has successfully implemented 24 recommendations a further assessment was conducted by the Crime Misconduct and Commission in 2011. It released an independent review of the Queensland Police Services policies and practices, where it found that a number of key concerns remained. These key concerns were related to the over use of Tasers and especially the use of Tasers upon those who are believed to have a mental health condition and/ or are believed to under the influence of alcohol and drugs. The following will provide a discussing of the introduction and development of the Queensland Police Service Taser police, where it will reflect upon these concerns regarding these ‘at risk’ groups.

Along with protests, many people went to trials discussing what was legal, what was an injustice, and many other complaints regarding the issue of slavery. One particular case was the Dred Scott v. Sandford case. Dred Scott was a slave who lived in many places with his owner. Shortly before his owner, Peter Blow’s death, Scott and his owner, moved back to slave territory (OI). Blow sold Scott to Dr. John Emerson just before he died. After working with Emerson, they moved to Illinois, a free state, where they stayed for many years (OI). They then moved farther up North the Mississippi River, where Scott even got married (OI). The Scotts moved back and forth betwixt different states, both free and slaves; Scott’s wife had her child in Fort Snelling

The probes can penetrate up to two inches of clothing with pinpoint accuracy (TASER International, n.d.). The charge is sent thru the wires and into the probes. The charge is transmitted between the two probes, jamming sensory and motor functions, and inhibiting muscular control (Seals, 2007). This effect continues in 5-10 second cycles each time you press the trigger (Seals, 2007). The TASER is designed to deliver a jolt of electricity to the victim, which results in complete loss of muscular control for a short period of time, allowing a police officer to handcuff and gain control of the offender. The Arizona based TASER International makes most of the TASERs used by law enforcement agencies today. TASER International claims that since early 1998 to 2010 over 406,000 TASERs have been sold worldwide, for law enforcement use. In 2007 TASER International produced $100.7 million in revenue, 85 percent coming from the United States.

The instance of Dred Scott v. John F.A. Sandford, honest to goodness case in which the U.S. Superior Court on March 6, 1857, decided that a slave who had stayed in a free state and area was not thusly fit the bill for his adaptability; that African Americans were not and could never be subjects of the United States; and that the Missouri Compromise, which had declared free all areas west of Missouri and north of degree, was unlawful. The decision added fuel to the sectional dispute and drove the country closer to regular war.

It also illustrates that the use of Taser and other CEDs can reduce the statistical rate of injury to suspects and officers who might be involved in physical conflict based on an analysis of 12 agencies and more than 24,000 use-of-force cases demonstrates that the odds of suspect injury decreased by almost 60% when a CED are utilized due to a 2011 report provided by the National Institute of Justice. Nonetheless, a 2011 study shows that CED use has risen about 70% as the use of baton has decreased by 25% in 2008.

Moreover, to limit officer’s discretion on unjustly use of deadly force, law enforcement agencies need to adopt new practices and techniques when dealing with the public if deadly use of force is not required. Officers should adopt new practices of using the taser as a means of force. “Tasers [are] developed to subdue suspects with non-lethal means” (DeLone, Thompson, 2009, p.416). Many law enforcement officers praise the use of tasers as a tool to “increase the safety of both officer and citizen by decreasing the use of deadly force” (DeLone, Thompson,2009, p.418). Individuals who are not complying/showing aggression with officers and or have some sort of weapon can be easily subdued and controlled with the taser rather than being shot at

The Taser International program itself has presented itself and its Taser products to law enforcement agencies as an alternate

There has recently been a demand for the use of less than lethal weapons in the community, and country at large. To meet this demand, the Asheville Police Department will be adopting the use of Tasers. Though Tasers are potentially lethal, they can be used more safely that a handgun, yet are more incapacitating than chemical spray. The use of Tasers will be explained with training as technology and laws progress. The most important thing is that the use of Tasers always falls within the law. Any actions taken should be proportionate to the situation, and the use of force should be no more than what is absolutely necessary. Officers must be prepared to show that they acted reasonably and justly. They must stay

In fact, some academics state that law enforcement as a whole over utilizes tasers (Wu, 2010). Regarding the case of Bryan v. McPherson (2009), the issue was whether the event violated Carl Bryan’s constitutional rights via excessive force. The courts decided that Carl Bryan was not a threat to the public or Officer McPherson because of the minor infraction, distance from an officer, and lack of concealment for possible weapons. The points of contention were whether the officer told Bryan to stay in his vehicle and if he took a step towards the officer. Although Bryan’s clothing was atypical, was verbally belligerent, and was making aggressive gestures with his hands the courts removed McPherson’s qualified immunity. For instance, the court stated that Bryan was not a threat, there was no warning before the deployment of the taser, and location led to a totality of excessive force. Nonetheless, based on the statement of facts, I believe that Bryan was acting strangely and aggressively and that would have altered the way I dealt with the

This proves that taser is an effective non-lethal weapon that can be used to subdue the criminals. Here are some possible advantages of taser guns, first, taser is a non-lethal weapon. As we may have already know, tasers are meant to take down the suspects without injuring or killing them. Also, it is safer to use in a situations where there are many bystanders in the scene, since tasers do not harm people around the intended suspects. This also leads to the second point of avoiding the usage of lethal weapons. So far, 1689 people have been killed by the police in a crime related actions (May, T. 2014). By promoting the usage of tasers, police officers around the world can lower the number of suspects being killed in the scene. Using the lethal weapon also dangers the suspects, police, and the bystanders, because firearms are a lethal weapon that can take away lives easily. Tasers also requires minimal training to use the functions, which also makes the officers and other security related people to easily use tasers in action. On the other hand, typical fire arms requires more training time to properly use them in order to avoid any accidents with it. Fourthly, by using taser, the injury rates dropped significantly. Taser have been used within law enforcement agencies from 1998, and from that time, according to the Taser International, taser helped lower injuries among officers and