Case Analysis : ' V. Cassidy '

Erik Ayala had purchased the murder weapon, a 9-milimeter pistol, from 99 Pawn & Guns on January 9, 2009 (ER 3, Memo in Opp, Ex. D, Depo of David Kartchner, 45:13 to 47:18; ER 42-46, Exhibit 1 attached to Kartchner Affidavit). The 99 Pawn & Guns employee that sold Erik Ayala was David Kartchner (Memo in Opp, Ex. D, Depo of David Kartchner, 45:13 to 47:18; ER 41-46. Memo in Opp, Ex. G. BATF Form 4473). When Mr. Kartchner submitted a background check to the Oregon State Police for approval, the Oregon State Police issued a two-day hold on the purchase (ER 45-48). Despite the two-day hold order by the Oregon State Police, Mr. Kartchner did not delay the sale and sold the gun to Erik Ayala on January 9, 2009 (ER 47).

Investigator Sam Reilly will also be called to testify, in that he was the first investigator on the scene. Shortly after the murder, Officer Reilly went to the defendant’s home at 2435 Damen Street, apt #2B and forced down Mr. John Hudsons’ and Dale Buckner’s door. While at the apartment, Officer Reilly Recovered a .38 revolver (matching the gun from the crime scene), a black leather jacket, and a newly registered Black Cadillac Sedan; which matched the description of the getaway car. Due to officer Reilly’s work, pertinent details of the defendant’s background and belongings have been brought to trial and will help us prove that the defendants did, beyond a reasonable doubt murder, and assist in murdering Mrs. Sara Lazar. Upon arrest, the defendant’s both refused to make a statement concerning the killing of Mrs. Lazar.

What alternatives are available to Brent in regards to the audit of payables? What are the pros and cons of each alternative?

In Alabama, Liles C. Burke has been selected for the government region court in the Northern District of Alabama. As of now, he fills in as a judge on the Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals. He is additionally an officer in the Judge Advocate General's (JAG) Corps of the Alabama Army National Guard. In two striking cases, Burke protested overbroad use of weapon laws. In the two cases, he was a nonconformist in the Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals. The two cases later went to the Alabama Supreme Court, which toppled the feelings and vindicated Burke's disputes. 2015's Tulley v. City of Jacksonville, Ala., was the primary case. Jason Dean Tulley straightforwardly conveyed a gun into a credit union. He was spotted by an on-holiday officer and

On June 26, 2015, Mr. Steve Gerecke, an Albuquerque, New Mexico resident, confronted six youths allegedly attempting to burglarize his home after gaining access through the garage with a remote control removed from his wife’s car. The group of youth appeared to have been the same roving mob reported earlier to the police. Witnesses and police reports complained of burglarized homes and cars with the removal credit cards, cellphone, keys, and other valuables. In addition to the burglaries, the group allegedly committed grand the auto. Upon the confrontation of Mr. Gerecke and the youth, an escalation of bravado ensued. At this time, one of the youth armed with pistol, shot Mr. Gerecke multiple times killing him in the driveway of his home. Well

Upon arrival and after all parties were detained and searched for weapons Sergeant Kincaid and I were advised by the victim in this case, Thomas Fitzgerald that the suspect, Duane Fisher had pointed a pistol at him and his daughter, Marrissa Rohrbach and had laid the firearm down on a piece of farm equipment prior to our arrival. At this time I was able to locate a loaded Browning Target Shooting Pistol inside a holster on top of a tractor attachment approximately

In the case between R. v Maracle, it was about a 14 year old Brantford female was kidnapped at gunpoint by David Maracle on May 26, 1997 and brutally and repeatedly raped. This event had accused on 1997, and then was farther investigated and made its way to court. On November 8, 2000, the trial judge found the appellant to be a dangerous offender and ordered him detained for an indeterminate period. The appellant appeals conviction and sentence. The case was later appealed in 2006. This case took place in superior court of justice. This case took place because the appellant’s conviction and sentence. In this case it shows the dangers so sex offenders and how hard they try to get away with crime that they have committed, even though they left all the proof / evidence behind at the location which was all leading up to them, being the one to frame. (http://www.thespec.com)

The pickup truck’s owner arrived, the defendant got his keys, told him to sit in the truck, and gave him beer. He then got back under the truck to wait some more. Passerby’s alerted the police who arrested the defendant. He also testified that while waiting for his friend, he started sobering up and thinking things over. He removed the bullets from the gun and put them in his pocket, and made plans to have a party at his house with the people in the pickup. They were drinking and conversing when the police arrived.

On August 2, 1990, 2:00 am the victim Yanira Correa was walking with a group of her friends on 164th street and River Avenue in the Bronx. The defendant Julio Fernandez went up to Miss Correa, and asked her to go back to the park and talk to his brother, she refused to go back. Fernandez than began to fire a handgun in the air, a boy from Correa’s friend group said to Fernandez “ why don’t you shoot at us?” He fired a couple of shots towards the group before going back to the park. About 15 minutes later the group reached Grand Concourse and 164th, Fernandez showed up in a cab, he got out of the car with a gun in his hand. He fired three shots directly at the group, hitting Correa in the chest. He was spotted shortly getting rid of a dark blunt object from his pants and putting it in the trashcan. After showing up at the scene police recovered a 9-millimeter automatic weapon from the garbage can. Fernandez was arrested in the park and charged with attempted murder in the second degree and reckless endangerment in the first degree, also criminal possession of a weapon. The prosecution

After being told the details of a supposed getaway car from a robbery, the police saw the car and began to drive after it (Rakas V. Illinois 439 U.S. 128 (1978)). The officers then took off after the car to conduct a search passed on probable cause. After completing the search the officers found a shot gun and shells within the car (Rakas V. Illinois 439 U.S. 128 (1978)). The owner of the vehicle had no correlations to the robbery, so the passengers took responsibility of the gun and ammo (Rakas V. Illinois 439 U.S. 128 (1978)). Upon their court date, the men that were incarcerated decided they wanted to motion to suppress the gun. However due to a lack of standing, the motion to suppress was denied (Rakas V. Illinois 439 U.S. 128 (1978)).

Hamilton‘s testimony in court that shows that he was threatened to be killed by his father who pointed a loaded pistol at his head. There was doubt that whether a loaded pistol presented at the child ‘s head was permitted within the parental discretion of punishment and correction of the child ‘s behaviours. 3 what did the three judges hearing the case say about what constitutes an assault in relation to pointing a gun at another? Simon Bronitt and Bernadette define an assault as the threat of force and a battery as the actual of force which cause a person to fear of immediate harm on him or her. The charge with both acts is generally assault.

For this assignment I choose the Lau v. Nichols, (1974) a Supreme Court case regarding English language learners and the impact had on education. This case was a pioneer for those English language learns because of its significance and attention it brought for equal rights for students. Lau v. Nichols begin in December 10th 1973 in the San Francisco school system roughly around 1,800 students from a Chinese heritage who didn’t speak English the case was resolved January 21, 1974. The impact the Lau v. Nichols case held on education was fight for equal rights for students of all race, gender, and religion. “By denying them a meaningful opportunity to participate in the public educational program and thus violates 601 of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which bans discrimination based "on the ground of race, color, or national origin," in "any program or

Christopher Simmons was not your typical American teenager. Abused and neglected as a young boy, by the time he was seventeen years old he came a convicted murderer and was sentenced to the death penalty. His case quickly became under fire for overriding his Eighth Amendment right that stated that the federal government cannot impose cruel and unusual punishment upon anyone. Christopher Simmons was old enough and mature enough to understand that what he did was morally and socially wrong. If someone can completely conjure up a murder plot by oneself, then they should be sentenced to the death penalty no matter the age. Simmons should have received the death penalty despite his age at the time of the crime he

Rue 21 is one of the many retailers that are geared towards teens, however what set them apart from the rest is their affordability. This company strives to keep all of its merchandise under 35 dollars. Rue 21 has locations in various strip malls with 52 percent, regional mall 31 percent and outlet centers 17 there are pros and cons that affect the company for each of them (Berman, 2009). Having this store in a strip center can be a really great thing for consumers put not such a positive thing for the company as a whole. The positive to a strip mall is that it is easily accessible for customers to find and shop at the location. Strip malls have less congestion when it comes to parking, which makes for a more pleasurable for shoppers like

For the mock trial I was assigned to be one of the prosecuting attorneys. After being presented with case materials which included facts of the case, statements from both prosecuting and defense witnesses, penal code for the alleged charges, and map of the crime scene, we as a group decided to create one Google Drive document. There we would upload our parts of the case and help other group members with their assignments.