Predication: On 06/02/17, Asset Protection Manager(APM) Jakub Orlando was contacted by a Store Manager(SM) Christina Mcgrath-Magenta regarding Shift Leader(SFL) Richard Diaz and two Customer Service Associates (CSA) James Hansen and Justin Gonzalez who were suspected of violating the Be Safe policy.
The first step in the investigation took place when the general manager of the D & M food store called the police department to speak with someone in reference to possible employee theft. On February 2, 2016 at 1330 hours, I met with Hugh Downs. He explained to me that he suspected his part time assistant manager, Lowraine James of theft.
Predication: On 09/21/17, Store Manager (SM) Anna Smirnov-Rodriguez contacted Asset Protection Manager (APM) regarding Beauty Consultant (BC) Ebony Bourne who was suspected of violating the Be Safe Policy.
On 04/26/16 APM Orlando interview Mr. Nichols with the store manager Christopher Frazier as a witness. Mr. Nichols stated that he was aware of the policy and that under no circumstances we should get into a physical altercation with shoplifters. Mr. Nichols stated that the reason why he attempted to stop the individual, who he suspected of stealing newspaper, is because;
On December 13, 2015, AP closed internal cash and merchandise theft case at the Bay Rockland for a value of $430. AP received a tip regarding theft of money in the locker room from associate’s personal belongings. Live surveillance showed the cleaner taking money from an associate’s jacket. The cleaner was interviewed and admitted to the theft of the associate’s money and also merchandise from the receiving
On 11/28/16, APM Orlando intervened SVC Moctezuma-Riverawith with Store Manager (MGR) Dominick Vitello as a witness. During the interview SVC Moctezuma-Riverawith admitted to using a fictional Balance Rewards card in customers
$95.26 was vouchered and returned to an authorized agent Mrs. Gail Smith [Mr. Smith's wife]
In the case of Phar-Mor fraud, the company was involved in cover up and some accounts were created to hide the fraudulent activities. Bad inventory counts in the stores were made to help with the cover up and deceit about activities that cost hundreds of millions of dollars. (Williams, S.L., 2011)
What happened: Millions of dollars in losses were split among the 129 stores and put as an expense on each stores balance sheet ->. In order to balance the expenses, management had to boost its assets by inflating inventory -> The auditor Coopers&Lybrant checked only 4 stores out of 129 in order to safe their money. In addition, they told senior management which stores they will check -> Phar-Mor prepared the inventory in accordance with its balance sheet -> The auditing firm was unable to uncover the fraud.
On the evening of January 5, 1993, Tracie Reeves and Molly Coffman, both twelve years of age and students at West Carroll Middle School, spoke on the telephone and decided to kill their homeroom teacher, Janice Geiger. They agreed that Coffman would bring rat poison to school the following days so that it could be placed in Geiger 's drink. After that , they would steal Geiger 's car and drive to the Smoky Mountains. On the morning of January 6, Coffman placed a packet of rat poison in her purse and board the school bus. Coffman told another student, Christy Hernandez, of the plan and show her the poison. Hernandez went and informed her homeroom teacher, Sherry
Richard Veller, the new CFO for Union Medical Center, began to change the operations of their management. Richard Veller looked to change UMC to an industrial system, which meant that the hospital would view cases as products. Just like any ordinary business, these products would have cost objects and would require an accounting system. In order to allocate costs appropriately, UMC was required to organize their cases into Diagnosis Related Groups to create a functional management control system. These changes brought certain internal issues into the spotlight. If solutions are not found, the hospital will not be able to implement their plans.
Jacquelyn Young hired the law firm of Becker & Poliakoff to represent her in her federal employment discrimination lawsuit against her employer. The firm associate that filed the action made a mistake by attaching the wrong U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) right-to-sue letter. The court dismissed the claims. The law firm did not try to re-file using the correct attachment, or try to dismiss the motion. Thirteen months later, the law firm informed Young that the claims had been dismissed, and that the firm was withdrawing from representing her further with the case.
FACTS: Acme is an accrual basis corporation that designs, manufactures, and markets widgets. Acme comes up with brand names for its various types of widgets that investors come up with. If a particular brand name is already trademarked, Acme obtains a licensing agreement that allows it to use the trademark. Since Acme's widgets function the same as other tools, the trademarks are what differentiates their widgets. Acme recently negotiated with Brand X Corporation for a license. They agreed on Acme paying Brand X, based on a percentage of sales revenue at the time of WidgetX Sales. This year, Acme produced $80 million worth of WidgetX, sold $54 million worth, and paid Brand X $1.2 million in licensing fees.
Under Arkansas case law pertinent to actual fraud, Is Mr. Sidewinder liable for fraudulent misrepresentation, when (1) the sword which was solicited as authentic turned out to be a replica; (2) the defendant characterized the sword as what he personally believed to be true; (3) the plaintiff was given the opportunity to inspect the sword before the sale was induced; (4) the plaintiff relied on the statements of the seller, believing him to have peculiar knowledge in the field, and purchased the sword before examining it herself; (5) the plaintiff bought the sword for $50,000 when it was only appraised to a value of $1,000?
Moore v. Midwest Distribution, Inc., 76 Ark. App. 397, 65 S.W. 3d 490 (Ark. Ct. App. 2002)