Case Comment : The Chancellor, Masters & Scholars Of The University Of Oxford & Ors Vs Rameshwari Fax Essay

Name Professor Course Date The practice of censorship and banning of books in learning institution has been prevalent mostly due to the explicit content incorporated in them. However, banning of certain books in pretense to conceal content perceived inappropriate to impressionable children is an infringement of their right to access information of their area of choice. While banning some book at times has valid reasons, it is important to endorse and emphasize that every child has the liberty to select, at their discretion, which book to read. While it is agreeable that parents and teachers should play a noble role in regulating books that entail controversial topics as well as educating their children as their primary guardian, their right does not extend to controlling and monitoring what children read

Caleb, a doctoral student, is sued by the author of a textbook for copyright infringement.

Students are usually required to prepare some class with some recommended reading books, journals or articles, (depending on the particular aims of the course), occasions where they are able to practice their literacy and language skills.

III Claim: (write a version of the claim from the introduction))Certain books should be banned from schools and libraries due to many circumstances and

In the case of The Canadian Copyright Licensing Agency (Access Copyright) vs. York University, I believe that the plaintiff, Access Copyright, will not be successful in their lawsuit against the defendant, York University.

Facts of the case (Summary of facts of case and its journey to Supreme Court)

Some other important information which has been collected from the www.austlii.edu.com under the section of this case to develop well understanding:

By looking at these examples in the bigger picture, the vicious cycle created by publishers becomes evident. Students find themselves forced to buy the books the professors assign, they must buy them new in order to get special access codes, and then they have difficulty selling the books back. Not to mention the fact that the release of newer editions can leave many students stuck with a book they do not want and more debt they cannot afford. This cycle created by publishers works by continuously finding new ways to charge students full price for textbooks while simultaneously finding ways to release newer editions on an almost semester-by-semester basis. The result: increased textbook prices and an increasing financial burden on students.

Textbooks are the most effective tool of educational technologies and they will always play a role in our educational systems. However they are being used as instruments to rewrite and sugarcoat

Colleges should offer its students free books in order to allow

Most students need their textbooks to excel in their coursework but Students are being taken advantage of by professors that require we buy their specific edition, and

While Mark’s objection is right, acceptable and reasoned, it is important to recognize the burden of buying books every now and then. If the college urges students to stop buying textbooks and instead rely on school materials stored on the Moodle for their study and classwork, it is in the recognition that not all students can afford to buy new books. The idea that students will spend much more in buying printers and printing papers is not enough to out this idea. Students can share printers and or use the school printers to print the learning resources and materials they need. In addition, students will not have to print the whole book or material, but a section that they are learning. The burden of having to carry books everywhere

Even though it is true that reading on real papers will help the readers pay attention to the contents than the screen and they can “practice an unnatural process of thought” (219), the writer overlooks advantages of e-books and other online information. Reading on pages is utterly better than reading on the screen, but carrying printed books is more inconvenient than carrying a laptop which can access numerous e-books. In addition, not everyone can afford printed books. For those people who need a lot of books, especially students, e-books and other online sources are rather economical and reasonable choices. And another great thing of it, on the internet, information is updated continuously, whereas printed books might be out of date and the readers have to buy new editions. Moreover, internet is a chance for people over the world to reach the book they need, because there is not every book are translated into other languages, or the original ones are not be transferred to their countries. With these benefit, printed books has become difficult to overwhelm the

This shows that textbook is never enough. Daniels & Zemelmen point out that textbooks offer superficiality (52) if not used properly and creatively. Hence, by incorporating steps in inquiry project like immersing ( building background knowledge), investigating ( doing research), coalescing ( intensifying and synthesizing information), and going public (sharing) (Daniels & Zemelmen, 264), students will go deeper in their learning than merely

Kirby v. Burke [1944] I.R. 207 Smith v. Howdens Ltd. [1953] N.I. 131, 137, per Lord MacDermott C.J. 10 Smith v. Scott [1973] Ch. 314 11 Commissioners for Railways v. McDermott [1967] A.C. 1054 12 Commissioners for Railways v. Quinlan [1964] A.C. 1054 13 Bagshaw, R. and McBride, N., ‘Tort Law’, (Pearson Education Limited, Essex, 2001) at 3 14 Ibid at 3 15 Anns. v. Merton London Borough Council [1978] A.C. 728