Case Study Advantages And Disadvantages

A case study is an intensive type of research that involves a process in which detailed information is collected

A case study is an in-depth study of one person; usually it takes into account almost every aspect of the client’s life or history, in order to analyze different patterns and behaviors. Case studies are used in multiple ways, sometimes a person will try to generalize the case to a larger population. This option is not used very often since findings have shown to be mostly subjective to the individual person. The other use of case studies is more for counseling purposes where the patient has a specific problem and they take the person’s history in order to solve it or create a treatment plan specifically for this person.

A case study involves in-depth research and documentation of one person or more than one person. Researchers gain a large insight into the case when it’s not as many people compared to surveys, which is one of its strengths. The advantages of a case study are a deeper understanding of the patient, and the researcher doesn’t ‘t have to do anything against his or her ethics. The disadvantages of a case study are time consumption, and it’s hard to generalize since case studies are usually unique cases unlike anything else. Case studies, surveys, and naturalistic observations are all descriptive research methods, since they cannot make predictions or determine causality.

An in-depth study of a particular situation rather than a sweeping statistical survey. Case study research is a method that was used to narrow down a very broad field of research into one easily researchable topic.

Case studies are one of the first types of research to be used in the qualitative methodology and repeating the study several times will lead to the increased reliability of the study (Starman, 2013). This methodology is appropriate because it will allow for data collection results to be generalized based on the theoretical propositions and not the population (Harrison et al. 2017).

7. Case study is an experiment using only a few individuals buy monitoring them closely to discover how behavior varies by cretan variables.

Case studies allow the least amount of control while conducting research.  This lack of control is considered to be one of the lowest forms on the scale of conducting a case study.  Case studies also involve only one person at a time without comparison to another group.  Because of how a case study is set up, it is difficult to compare the results from a

There are three basic methods a researchers uses to conduct research. The first method is the observational method which is when behavior is closely observed. Now there are two different categories when it comes to the observational method- naturalistic observation and laboratory observation. When doing naturalistic observation the researcher views the participants in their natural environment. Now when doing laboratory observations the participants are viewed in a lab. Researchers have more control in a laboratory. Laboratory observations are more meaningful than those obtained with naturalistic observations. The second method is the case study method which involves an in-depth study of an individual or a group of individuals. When doing the case study method it allows the researchers to investigate a topic in way more detail than might be possible if they were trying to work with a large number of research participants. The last method that researchers use is the survey method. When using the survey method questions are administered through interviews or questionnaires. Case studies allow a researcher to investigate a topic in far more detail than might be possible if they were trying to deal with a large number of research participants.

Case studies, whilst a very simple way of performing studies, have multiple pros alongside the cons.

Case studies are considered an influential research methodology that can association group interviews and individual interviews with observation. Researchers perform observations, get information from brochures, reports, receipts, and articles and add it along with interview data from those that participate. The goal for the case study is to

A case study is a description of an actual administrative situation involving a decision to be made

A case analysis method of study provides experiential education—learning by doing. Therefore, the amount of learning students receive from an individual case is directly related to the amount of work they put into it.

In order to explore individual meanings, definitions, examples and attitudes about organizational politics other authors used a purely qualitative methodology (Buchanan, 1999; Buchanan and Badham, 1999). This research uses a case study as the research strategy that allows researchers to concentrate „on a single phenomenon or entity (the case), from which the researcher uncovers the interaction of significant factors characteristic of the phenomenon. The case study focuses on holistic description and explanation”. Merriam (1998:29). Moreover, one review found that case studies to be the most popular qualitative research strategy primarily due to its potential to generate novel and groundbreaking theoretical insights (Piekkari, Welch & Paavilainen, 2009).

A case study method of research does not really need to be long, they can range from a few paragraphs to few pages depending on the question being studied. They can either be real life issues or fictitious. There is usually a dilemma that needs to be resolved, with some information missing and solutions must be within the control of the protagonist. One can write the dilemma so that it can reach one of three analytical dimensions:

Most case study advocates point out that case studies produce much more detailed information than what is available through a statistical analysis. Advocates will also hold that while statistical methods might be able to deal with situations where behavior is homogeneous and routine, case studies are needed to deal with creativity, innovation, and context. Detractors argue that case studies are difficult to generalize because of inherent subjectivity and because they are based on qualitative subjective data, generalizable only to a particular context.