Case Study Between Push And Pull System

Evaluation of the queues at each station revealed that Station 3 (Average Queue: 556.6, St Dev: 453.3) was more strained than Station 1 (Average Queue: 386.1, St Dev: 363.3). The firm understands that as queues Figure 2: Machine Utilization and Queues at Littlefield Technologies

The timing of capacity changes also needs to be taken into consideration to achieve maximum efficenty given that demands of their products varies with seasonal changes. The ability to react to market demand changes quickly will determine manufacturers flexibility in keeping up with these demands. Manufacturers needs facilities to produce, whether warehouses to store its raw materials or finished goods, or manufacturing plants to produce their products. Services facilities are needed by certain manufacturing industries such as consumer electronics to cater for returns. Distribution centres also determine the efficenty of production distribution and un-nesessary inventory holding will result in higher holding cost. Such facilities require large investments and are integral of the manufacturer’s supply chain strategy and thus proper planning is needed when making these decisions regardong the size, location which affect the overall operations. How manufacturers run their productions also determine how successful will they be in terms of productivity and quality levels. Different types of equipment and processes also affect the cost and output of the manufacturing plant. Information systems that flow both upstream and downstream affects the forecasting, planning, inventory and production levels, they must be robust to ensure the manufacturing firm is able to react accordingly to changing demands and variations. In addition to their internal environment,

The production-line approach allows companies, such as fast-food restaurants, to use a workstation approach and/or an

4) Exploring the possibility of implementing JIT (Just in Time) system that can reduce the finished goods inventory at

The pieces to work stations or to operator in the production line or line segment is 2000 to 15 or 400 to 3 based on 15 direct labor employees. (See question 2)

In recent years, the requirements of commercial and industrial operations in the production of services and goods have been subject to vast changes. In the present era of globalization and increasing international competition, a trend away from vertically integrated organizations has become more and more evident. In fact, most companies nowadays tend to solely concentrate on their own core competencies, outsourcing different steps of the production. However, including a great many of other organizational units to the production systems, has lead to rising complexity in terms of the operations management (Plenert, 2012).

Production staff and process workers will be divided into five different teams. Each team will be responsible for the manufacturing of five product lines. Team members will only work on the r specialty line, and rosters will be altered to ensure adequate staff on each line during • he 12-hour production cycle. This may involve changes to staff rosters, in some cases by implementing 12-hour shifts, but will not impact on earnings or result in the loss of any hours of work.

Labor-intensive purchasing process is an expensive and low value-added work. Currently, the company has no centralized management to perform strategic purchasing. It was a concern that whether employees would come up with speed to the dramatic changes coming from re-engineering. Some of multiple hand-offs between department look complicated and redundant. An example of solution would simplify the process from demand planning to raw material planning to be implemented by less employees within a close group. In addition, the organization should be re-designed to a more “customer oriented” to align with the turnkey

Work cell methods have proven to be an effective method of production, where it reduces material, improves employee movement, makes inspections easier, and it enhances communication. It will allow MEGA Intel to limit the number of employees working at a given time, saving on overtime costs. All employees will be properly trained to assist each other while in the assigned work cell, and training over better material usage and maintenance will be provided. By integrating a work cell production method, MEGA Intel computers can easily control manufacturing processes and employee efficiency; however, bottleneck operations can easily constrain the workflow. To keep bottlenecking from being a major problem, MEGA Intel employees will be cross-trained and multitasking machines will be readily available to correct problems and correct the production process.

In the early stages of manufacturing quality and cost went hand-in-hand, if one went down so did the other but now quality is maintained at an excellent standard and cost is going down; engineers are racing to the bottom in price. This is achieved by the engineers that have created a system of work that is the assembly line, allowing for more affordability and profitable, and leading to innovation. By implementing the assembly line system of work, it requires simple tasks to be accomplished by multiple people at a constant pace, which results in cost efficient production. This system allows more product to be produced in a smaller period of time to meet the demand of the people, as the price is cheaper. However, profit is not changed

Since the current assembly line layout should achieving 100% line efficiency when running at maximum capacity of 215 units. Thus, to operate at target 300 units/day, the current assembly line needs to redesign.

The Ford Production System (FPS) would utilize a pull-based production process that synchronizes production and ensures flow and stability throughout the production process. Ordered assembly drives costs down by providing Ford and its suppliers when and where supplies are needed. This also reduces overstocking of supplies.

When it comes to processes and activities, there are wide differences between a service-based organisation and a manufacturing environment. In the production line of a factory like

Production Strategies Make to Stock/Make to Order/Make to Forecast and the similarities/differences between them and push/pull strategies.

According to [5], Just-in-Time (JIT) inventory management enables an organization to gain competitive advantage by not having a large or excessive amount of inventory in warehouse. The organization only needs to order the parts when they are actually needed and new materials are produced only when old materials have finished. One advantage of adopting this strategy is that there will be no excess of inventory that needs to be stored and hence the inventory levels will be reduced as well as the cost of carrying and storing goods. One major disadvantage of this is that the organization will expose it in the risk of ordering problems for example a supplier is not able to provide parts on time. The result of this is that the organization cannot fulfill the order and contributes to customer dissatisfaction.