Case Study: Castaldo Vs. Jefferson County

Assuming that the school district was not justified in its actions, does Susie have a claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983?

Sonoma County, California (CA) is located in the central part of the state just northwest of the San Francisco/Oakland area. With a population of around 485,000 (81% white), the residents work mainly in the agricultural industry. Sonoma County, California (CA) is the world famous home of the state's popular wine industry that includes the Napa Valley. Many of the county's current issues related to drug abuse and addiction could be attributed to its proximity to the high crime areas of Oakland to the south.

Factual History: In Los Angeles, California during the month of October and year of 2009, Abel Lopez was attacked and robbed by a man with a knife, he later identified as Walter Fernandez. During the confrontation between Lopez and Fernandez, Fernandez informed Lopez the territory in which Lopez was ruled by the “Drifters” After Lopez placed a call to 911, a few minutes after the attack, police and paramedics arrived on the scene. Two Los Angeles police officers, Detective Clark and Officer Cirrito, drove to a nearby alley that was often contained members of the Drifters gang. Here in the ally, a witnesses told them that the suspect was in an apartment in a house located off the

Facts: Plaintiffs Carl and Elaine Miles, owners and impresarios of “Blackie, The Talking Cat” brought a lawsuit in U.S. District Court for the S.D. Georgia, challenging the constitutionality of the Augusta, GA, Business License Ordinance. They complained that the ordinance was inapplicable in their case “accepting contributions from pedestrian in the downtown Augusta area, who wanted to hear the cat speak “and that the ordinance violates the rights of speech. The Plaintiffs attacked the ordinance as being unconstitutional and overbroad in contravention of the due process clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment.

Successful ELL programs in schools require specific knowledge of ever-changing federal and state laws including funding requirements, as well as current knowledge of “best practices” regarding ELL programming. These subjects will be discussed as well as resources for reviewing programming policies against current laws, regulations, and policies.

The issue the NCAA has with players being played to play is numerous but also inadequate. The NCAA created a word to use so that when an opposing group tries to attack them they can strike them down with no worries. The word is, “student-athlete,” they have devised this term so that if an

At the time of the first incident involving Riley, he was known to be affiliated with the Lincoln Park gang in San Diego, California. On August 2, 2009, Riley with a few other gang members shot at a man of their opposing gang. Shortly after the scene took place, Riley and his crew then drove off in Riley’s vehicle. After a few days, on August 22, 2009, a police officer had pulled Riley over for expired tags on the current vehicle he was driving. At the same time, after running his license, the officer discovered that Riley was driving on a suspended license. Following the official procedure, Riley’s vehicle was to be impounded. Before his vehicle could be towed away though, the officer must go through and search

nation that holds the most diverse population in the world, a nation where many other languages

In 2014, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) proposed a guidance policy called the Deferred Action for Parents of Americans and Lawful Permanent Residents (DAPA), which would grant temporary deportation protection to about 4.3 million undocumented immigrants. But in that year, twenty-six states challenged the DAPA guidance, therefore the Supreme Court will decide whether the states have standing to challenge DAPA if will increase the costs of state-subsidized benefits, for example drivers license , and if DAPA is lawful and constitutional under the Administrative Procedure Act and the Take Care Clause of the Constitution. This case is called United States v. Texas. The United States states that Texas lacks Article III standing to challenge

In the case of Johnson vs. Texas, Gregory Lee Johnson was brought to court for burning the American Flag outside of the convention center during the Republican National Convention. The incident occurred in Dallas Texas in the year 1984 when Ronald Reagan was President. The report stated that Johnson was protesting against Reagan’s policies in America. Johnson was proved to be a member of a private institution that promoted the communist movement. His protest against Reagan expressed his dissatisfaction. Johnson was arrested and charged for violating a Texas statue fined $2000 dollars for his actions. In response to the fine, Johnson appealed and took his case to the United States Supreme Court.

Riley vs. California is one of the most imporntant supreme court cases during the 21st century. If ruled the in favor of the state of California it would fundmentaly change the fourth amendment officers would be able to search people’s phones with no other evidence other than they thought that it was in best intrest to them to serach it and you could have done nothing about it and that is a clear violation of the protection of unreasonable search and seizure that the fourth amendment gives us. To understand why this case was so important you have to know the backround of the situation. It started in San Diego were a man named David Riley was pulled over because he was driving with a expired license plate. The police officer during that stop found out that Riley was driving while his license was suspended. The

In the case of California v Ciralolo, the government did not do too far. In 1986 Dante Ciralolo, lived in Santa Clara California and was growing marijuana in his backyard, which was illegal. After receiving many reliable tips from the community, the police investigated these allegations. When they arrived at his home, they found a six-foot outer fence and a ten-foot inner fence surrounding his place so they couldn’t see into his backyard. The other houses in the neighborhood area did not have high fences so the police were curious of what he was doing behind the walls of his yard (Doc. B, C). Did they go too far by renting a plane to view his property and not getting a search warrant? I do not think so because this act did not defile the 4th Amendment.

California v. Carney was a United States Supreme Court case. California v. Carney was argued on October 30th, 1984 and decided on May 13th, 1985. The petitioner was the State of California and the respondent was Charles R. Carney. The petitioner claims that warrantless searches of motor homes does not violate the Fourth Amendment of the U.S. constitution. The decision was 6 for California and 3 votes against.

I would like to start off by saying both schools give extraordinary educational programs. Although, there are quite a few differences there are also some similarities. As of right now, I am going to give some differences about the teachers, the social system, and the food. I will also include some similarities throughout my discussion. I personally enjoyed my time at Lawrence County, but Co-Lin has opened my eyes to a brighter future.

1. To start with, Santobello v. New York states that the analysis does not focus on the harmlessness of the breach of a plea agreement. In this case, the original prosecutor agreed not to make any sentencing recommendations in the plea agreement, but the new prosecutor recommended the maximum sentence. The judge decided to sentence the defendant to the maximum sentence, and said that he was not influenced by the new prosecutor's breach of the plea agreement. The Supreme Court abandoned the conviction and delayed the case, stating that they made a promise in the negotiation of a plea. In other words, the breach of the plea agreement itself lead to the removal of a judgment.