I. Background of the Case
The CJI Company Wants to approve their capability of providing the required items for the Great Lakes boats company, in order to increase their incomes, $10 millions a year, and to get the long-term follow-on potentials as well. It will do that through the contract signed with it. The CJI has a problem of providing the required quantity of bilge pumps and the purchasing manager who put the contract together with Great Lakes faces three solutions we will see them in the incoming sections.
II. Problems Statement
How the CJI Company can supply 50 pumps per month for the Great Leak Company.
III. Alternative Solutions
The Alternative solutions which CJI Have Are:- 1- Continue to use Heavey to…show more content…
From the CJI’s perspective MR. Ashby has to discuss their ability to provide the whole required quantities from all the items which The Great Leak Company requested. From the Heavey’s perspective he has to discuss the ability of Heavey Company to provide the required quantity pumps with the required quality on time.
2. Should CJI continue to use Heavey to supply pumps, should they make them in-house, should they consider one of the other suppliers, or should they do some combination of these alternatives? Discuss the advantages, disadvantages, and risks of each of these alternatives.
In order to answer this question could you please sees the previous section.
How can CJI assure continued contract compliance and additional contract business from Great Lakes in the future?
They have to make the required quantity of these pumps in their factory. Like that they will have the required quantity along wit the required quality on time. And the Great Lake Company will be satisfied and they will consider them as a reliable supplier which leads to more business at the future and building a strong loyal