preview

Case Study: Discrimination At Trenton

Better Essays
Open Document

1. Identify and describe the specific issues that Maalick encountered in the workplace. Do the actions of other workers at Trenton represent discrimination and harassment? What elements of laws are important for Trenton to consider? Maalick encountered many types of actions which could potentially infringe upon the requirements of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The first being the actions of his supervisor Jenkins, in raising concerns with, questioning the authenticity of, and making jokes about the new religion which Maalick was following. These same concerns were also raised by other employees after they heard he was taking time off to attend the five day intensive. After returning from the intensive Maalick was faced with his office being decorated with “voodoo style” dolls and pictures of Africa with strange symbols on them. He also continually received notes on his desk and car which referenced black magic and his own disappearance because of changing his name. He also encountered racial discrimination in the form of finding the following on his desk: “Prayer for Black People” chants and a book titled Mythical Practices from the Negro Experience.” The last act, and the one that made him finally report the activity, was an outside applicant from his supervisor’s church being hired over himself, even …show more content…

An employer can be vicarious liable for co-worker harassment under negligence principles if they knew or had reason to know or had reason to know that the harassment was occurring and did not take adequate steps to address the harassment (29 C.F.R. § 1604.11(d); EEOC v. Prospect Airport Servs., Inc., 2010; Porter v. Erie Foods Int'l, Inc., 2009; Barrett, 2006; Mandell, 2005). Employers can also be held liable for harassment by a supervior. (Faragher v. City of Boca Raton, 1998; Burlington Indus., Inc. v. Ellerth,

Get Access